Next on the agenda, NY.
We see that the left didn’t learn from what Virginia tried. They now want to do another redistricting map to create more Democrat districts.
Unbelievable that they are saying that the gerrymandered black districts will remain. If New York succeeds again in forcing a new congressional map in 2026, it will be the fourth district change since 2021.
No Virginia, you can’t eliminate all Republican districts in California, Illinois, and Colorado.
I saw on one of those obscure websites where a loon posted that California, Illinois, and Colorado could eliminate all Republican districts. Here’s what leftist AI has to say about that.
Short answer: No — even after the Louisiana ruling, California, Illinois, and Colorado cannot legally eliminate all Republican districts. The ruling restricts race‑based mapmaking, not partisan gerrymandering, and each of these states faces structural, legal, and geographic constraints that prevent a total wipeout of GOP representation.
The Supreme Court’s 6–3 decision in Louisiana v. Callais struck down Louisiana’s map because it used race as the predominant factor in drawing a second majority‑Black district. The ruling weakens Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, making it harder to justify maps drawn with explicit racial considerations.
Important:
This means blue states can still draw partisan‑leaning maps — but they cannot use race as the primary tool to do so.
No. Even with Prop 50 giving Democrats power to redraw maps mid‑decade, analysts show California can at most eliminate 3–5 Republican seats, not all seven.
Even Rep. Terri Sewell’s political call to “eliminate all GOP districts” in CA was aspirational rhetoric, not something legally or mathematically feasible.
No. Illinois already has one of the most aggressively pro‑Democratic maps in the country.
No — and even less so than CA or IL. Colorado uses an independent redistricting commission, not legislative control.
Across all three states, three constraints prevent a full partisan wipeout:
Even though partisan gerrymandering is allowed, maps still must satisfy:
Republican voters are not evenly spread; some areas are too strongly Republican to be cracked without creating bizarre, indefensible districts.
The Louisiana ruling makes race‑based gerrymanders harder, but it does NOT empower blue states to eliminate all Republican districts. Political rhetoric aside, the math, geography, and legal frameworks make such a total partisan wipeout impossible in California, Illinois, or Colorado.
How the courts can fix the fake Virginia ballot issue.
Short and sweet. The ballot wording may be the proof for the courts to overturn the fake ballot issue. It claimed to bringing fairness to Virginia. But changing the house seats from 6-5 to 10-1 is fair to who?
In closing. Virginia law and the state constitution require a 90‑day waiting period between final legislative approval and the public vote.
According to leftist AI.
The 90‑day requirement was not met for Tuesday’s Virginia redistricting amendment vote. Multiple courts and news outlets confirm that early voting began less than 90 days after the General Assembly approved the amendment, which is why the judge ruled the referendum “ineffective” and blocked certification.
You make the call. Did Spanberger lie to voters during the campaign about how she would not pursue this gerrymandered redistricting?
What she said when she was running.
In 2019, Spanberger publicly criticized gerrymandering and positioned herself as a supporter of fair, non‑partisan redistricting.
According to reporting, she said that:
Gerrymandering is “detrimental to our democracy.”
Opposing it should be a “bipartisan priority.”
She supported Virginia’s independent redistricting commission, which voters approved in 2020.
These comments aligned her with a reform‑oriented, anti‑gerrymandering position.
And today.
Supporting a Democratic‑led redistricting amendment
Backing a plan that critics say would create a 10–1 Democratic congressional map
Arguing that the change is a temporary.
How could this be? Progressives said that only red states gerrymandered?
I’m sure that by now you’ve heard that blue state governors are crying the blues. Acting like they never heard of gerrymandering in a blue state. Some even said that because Texas Republicans were doing what Texas Democrats did, they were going to gerrymander. Well Obama’s boy the former Democrat mayor was going to set the record straight.
On Thursday’s broadcast of CNN’s “Inside Politics,” CNN Senior Political and Global Affairs Commentator, former U.S. Ambassador to Japan, former Obama Chief of Staff, and former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel acknowledged that Illinois is a heavily gerrymandered state and admitted “I have participated in it” edited.
On Thursday’s broadcast of CNN’s “Inside Politics,” CNN Senior Political and Global Affairs Commentator, former U.S. Ambassador to Japan, former Obama Chief of Staff, and former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel acknowledged that Illinois is a heavily gerrymandered state and admitted “I have participated in it”
CNN was used as a source for this article.
Nuff Said,
