Categories
Censorship Commentary Corruption Hate Leftist Virtue(!) New Kid on the block Reprints from others. Uncategorized

How Reddit Radicalizes The Left And Encourages Political Violence.

How Reddit Radicalizes the Left and Encourages Political Violence.

This is a reprint article Wishy sent me so I thought that we should add Wishy to our stable of contributors.

Below is an article that was originally written in the Federalist.

By: Reddit Lies

Violence from the left.

Reddit, a link-aggregating website that claims to be the “front page of the internet,” has turned into a hotbed for radicalization.

Reddit’s fundamental reliance on upvotes over an algorithm produces an unstable equilibrium in the hands of bad-faith moderators. This creates an incredible echo chamber made up of subreddits, which create groups of individuals who will gladly throw away their empathy as long as they view themselves as a “bastion of good” fighting those who are ontologically evil.

In some rare cases, these individuals reach beyond the keyboard and manifest this radicalization into action.

This article is meant to shed some light onto the unseen world of Reddit, where left-wing users are routinely goaded into increasingly concerning rhetoric and, sometimes, even violence.

How Reddit Works
To understand why Reddit is uniquely suited for this type of radicalization, you will need a basic understanding of how Reddit operates.

Unlike most social media platforms that utilize complex faceless algorithms to curate content for individuals, Reddit is far simpler. Users are given the ability to “upvote” and “downvote” content, which directly affects what other users see. Theoretically, this system produces a true marketplace of ideas, but there’s a catch.

Reddit relies heavily on more than 40,000 volunteer moderators to act as guide rails for subreddits, allowing good faith and positive discourse to flourish. However, Reddit’s moderators wield remarkable power and go largely unchecked, likely because the value these unpaid moderators bring to the platform makes them indispensable, no matter how Orwellian and drunk on power these moderators become. The free reign that moderators have over the site gives them inordinate power over the system.

Often moderators are not selected based on their ability to moderate but rather on their desire to moderate. Since these mods are volunteers, one of the biggest rewards for becoming a Reddit moderator is the power the mods wield.

The problem Reddit faces today is that many Reddit moderators are no longer interested in moderating speech. Instead, these activist moderators use their power to suppress the speech of dissenters, tumbling subreddits into radicalizing echo chambers. They achieve this by censoring and banning anyone who goes against the narrative. Want proof of the assertion Donald Trump hates black people? You’re banned. You refute the claim “genital Surgery is not performed on minors in the states”? You’re banned. Post a link to an Associated Press story about how “South Africa begins seizing white-owned farms“? You’re banned from ever posting in that subreddit again.

Who Uses Reddit?
In terms of user demographics, 74 percent of Redditors are men, and nearly 64 percent are between the ages of 18 and 29. Research has demonstrated that this demographic is uniquely vulnerable to radicalization, and the radicalization of these individuals is becoming increasingly common due, in large part, to the internet and social media. Most headline news stories about the dangers of social media spotlight right-wing radicalization, but this often belies the fact that left-wing radicalization is similarly common on sites like Reddit. Left or right, Reddit is an especially unique social media site that can foster political radicalization among its users.

Discourse on Reddit often quickly devolves into the kind of language that can encourage radicalization. Redditors can often be found using extreme language to attack and belittle their opponents. However, the most vile rhetoric often manifests itself in “safe-space” subreddits where their opponents are either unable or unwilling to retort. The pattern of comments often becomes detrimentally self-reinforcing, where Redditors are praised for doubling down and repeating increasingly radical ideas.

The lack of disagreement radicalized individuals on Reddit encounter means they often come to believe they are a bastion of virtue fighting against the predations of an ontologically evil opponent. This manifests itself in the wholesale hatred of entire groups such as the GOP, where accusations like “All Republicans are Fascists” are repeated dozens if not hundreds of times per day. These baseless accusations often receive hundreds or thousands of approving upvotes, boosting the message to the top of comment threads.

Another common result of residing in radicalizing echo chambers is that Redditors consistently perceive threats that are not actually there. For instance, claims of a “trans genocide” never hold up to academic scrutiny or official definitions of “genocide.” And Redditors are constantly concerned that Republicans, due to their religious nature, are “fundamentally theocratic” or worse, they are “Christofascists.” To say that Redditors frequently demonstrate fundamental misunderstandings of Republicans and conservatives would be a monumental understatement.

And in an environment where extremism is unchallenged, misinformation is the bread and butter of the so-called “free-thinking, high IQ” individuals on Reddit. Redditors will frequently misconstrue the truth in order to conflate individuals and ideologies that are not actually linked. It then becomes a game of tenuously tying those two ideologies together via mental gymnastics and repeated lies.

A very common example of this is accusing Republicans of being Nazis, and the idea that “when someone from the left calls someone a fascist, they are more than often not” seems to be one that many at Reddit take seriously. Indeed, in addition to Republicans, here is a list of things Redditors have accused of being fascist: Andrew Yang, Joe Biden, voting, people who don’t like pit bulls, J.R.R. Tolkien, people who don’t like Antifa, anyone who thinks Kyle Rittenhouse is innocent, the Supreme Court, Second Amendment supporters, Christians, Chik-fil-A, the American flag, pro-lifers, neo-liberals, Twitter parody accounts, people born in 1988, and Florida. This could all be written off as absurd if Redditors didn’t frequently advocate violence against and express hatred toward so-called fascists without repercussions.

Along these lines, another common tactic is amplifying the actions of a small portion of a group to demonize the entire group. For example, when one individual does something heinous, such as one lawmaker in Florida making a ridiculous bill “outlawing Democrats” — technically, the bill outlawed any party that had formerly supported slavery — many Redditors condemned Ron DeSantis for it, despite DeSantis publicly disavowing it.

A License to Hate
Redditors are, just like most social media users, highly motivated to oppose things they see as evil. This motivation, coupled with moderators permitting ontological hatred of an entire group of people, is what gives Redditors an excuse to go on the offensive without pesky restrictions such as “empathy” and “respect.” Once this “license to hate” takes hold of a subreddit, it will begin to spiral into ever-increasing hateful discourse.

This process is initiated when moderators, rather than moderating the speech of a subreddit, decide that hateful rhetoric against certain “out groups” is acceptable and even praiseworthy. This suggestion of ontological evil is often the core foundation of radicalization on Reddit. The manifestation of this can be seen in subreddits such as r/WhitePeopleTwitter, r/196, r/MurderedByWords, and many other “non-political” subreddits that have become highly politicized as their moderators have decided that speech against “fascism” (which is merely speech against any conservative) is wholly justified.

Users of these subreddits will often get showered with upvotes for making absurd claims like “The GOP are all fascist traitors” that quickly devolve into people advocating for violence against any and all individuals on the political right. In that situation, moderators are often the only thing capable of preventing a politicized subreddit from spiraling into insanity.

Unfortunately, moderators willing to hold the line on civil discourse are few and far between on Reddit. When moderators release restrictions on speech based on the aforementioned ontological evils projected onto enemies (e.g., “kill all fascists”), the community begins its descent into chaotic vitriol:

This often comes along with crackdowns against dissenting opinions. Often mods will put their foot down and make broad sweeping statements about “not tolerating nazis” and then ban individuals who, for instance, have any activity in r/Conservative because “All Conservatives are Nazis.”

This intolerance of opposing views, driven by the agenda of moderators, is resulting in the death of subreddits and a cooling of speech on the platform. One such example of this is the subreddit r/JusticeServed. Activist mods of the subreddit used an automated tool to systematically ban users who had any participation in subreddits like r/Conservative. The result of these ban waves was the rapid stagnation of a multimillion-subscriber subreddit.

What’s more, the administrators of Reddit apparently support this insane automatic banning process. Recently, when a few confused members of r/Conservative posted the messages they received showing they had been banned from participating in r/JusticeServed, the moderators of r/Conservative got a stern warning from Reddit administrators warning them against “ban showboating.” Needless to say, left-wing subreddits have not been given the same warnings.

Mods that use mass-banning systems are creating giant rifts in user overlap that both hurt communities on Reddit and damage the site’s retention of users and reputation as a whole.

Herman Cain Award
Redditors are champing at the proverbial bit to have a justification to become engulfed in hatred. One of the most prominent examples of how enticing this “license to hate” is for Redditors can most clearly be seen in the meteoric rise of the hate subreddit r/HermanCainAward.

Herman Cain was a 2012 presidential candidate. During the beginning of the pandemic, he publicly denied the severity of Covid-19, which would ultimately take his life in July. In August 2020, a month after his death, his Twitter account posted this: “It looks like the virus is not as deadly as the mainstream media first made it out to be.”

This quickly entrenched Herman Cain as the poster child for individuals who denied the severity of Covid or refused the vaccine and eventually succumbed to the disease.

The subreddit r/HermanCainAward was launched just three weeks later, but it would rise in popularity in the fall and winter of 2021. What resulted was one of the most grotesque displays of widespread hatred for humanity ever orchestrated on Reddit.

The format of the subreddit was simple. Find an individual (usually from Facebook) who had succumbed to the virus and then find posts from that same person downplaying the danger of the pandemic or refusing a vaccine. You then post a timeline of their death to Reddit and, like roaches to a sewer, the worst of Reddit crawled into the comments to jeer and laugh at the demise of these individuals.

While reveling in the death of people is egregious in itself, some users would regularly take this one step further. In the early days of the subreddit, before it was a requirement to censor names and faces, Redditors would often track down the Facebook account itself and harass the grieving family members.

More than 500,000 Redditors would eventually subscribe to the subreddit that gave them a license to hate. The subreddit was so bad that even liberal corporate media outlets felt they had to condemn it.

Fomenting Violence and Terror Recruitment
When these Reddit echo chambers encourage extremism and allow misinformation to flourish, the threats perceived by the individual members of these Reddit communities are portrayed as imminent and dire. This means these threats demand quick, decisive action. After steeping themselves in rhetoric like this, there is only one conclusion that can logically be drawn by many of the Reddit radicals — violence is justified. Indeed, If you truly believed there was an active genocide going on against trans people perpetrated by “Literal Nazis,” wouldn’t you do anything you could to stop it?

In the spring of 2022, when the draft opinion about Roe v. Wade leaked, r/196 — a left-leaning chaotic meme subreddit — became a hotbed for radicalizing threats, with users posting the addresses and making blatant threats against the Supreme Court on a very regular basis. This included posting the home addresses of justices alongside information on how to make Molotov cocktails, repeatedly issuing bomb threats, and other general terroristic threats. Only in the most egregious cases did the r/196 moderators step in to curtail the unruly crowd.

In one notable case, a Redditor was contacted by the Department of Homeland Security for threats he or she had made on Reddit toward SCOTUS. And Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s would-be assassin, a man by the name of Nicholas Roske, was actively looking for affirmation as he suggested assassinating the justice on a subreddit known as r/TwoXChromosomes. He laid out his initial intention on Reddit before he was arrested near Kavanaugh’s house with a Glock, zip ties, a tactical knife, pepper spray, a hammer, a screwdriver, a nail punch, a crowbar, and duct tape.

Naturally, Antifa has found Reddit instrumental in rallying radicalized individuals to its cause. Reddit has thoroughly spread Antifa’s violent ideology, which, again, effectively states that there is no middle ground: Everyone that disagrees with Antifa is a fascist who doesn’t deserve rights or basic protections such as free speech, and any violence committed against these literal Nazis is self-defense, even if you’re the aggressor.

After a user has been successfully steeped in such rhetoric, Reddit provides a gateway for Redditors to turn their anger into violent activism. Subreddits like r/AntifascistsOfReddit give users explicit guides for how users can cover their tracks and hide from scrutiny. (This is often referred to as OPSEC, or “operational security.”)

Antifa’s OPSEC and non-hierarchical organizing structure often make it hard to directly connect violence to the influence of the organization. It should come as no surprise then that Redditors are being arrested for violence connected to Antifa causes. Samuel Fowlkes, one of the Antifa members arrested in April for attacking protesters at a drag show in Texas, had an extensive history on Reddit. His posts and comments demonstrate just how instrumental Reddit was in his radicalization. Kyle Tornow, a man who threatened to blow up a Portland police station during the civil unrest in 2020, also had a history on Reddit.

And while perhaps he wasn’t as far-left as Antifa, it’s worth noting the account of the man behind the recent mass shooting in Louisville, Kentucky, was also found on Reddit. His account regularly espoused left-wing views.

Breaking the Cycle
For the most part, Redditors don’t expand their hate beyond the reach of their keyboards. However, it should also come as no surprise that some Redditors decide to take the logical conclusions of the narratives they’re spoon-fed into real life. By now, Reddit has a well-established history of being used by these violent activists to attempt to get advice, suggestions, or praise for carrying out violent acts against other individuals.

That history is as extensive or more extensive than many other social media sites that have been relentlessly called out for violence and disinformation. And yet, the media and the rapidly increasing number of “disinformation” groups have given Reddit radicalization hardly any attention. It appears they only regard violent rhetoric as a problem when it can be connected to right-leaning politics. If concern about violent rhetoric were applied fairly, there would be a deafening chorus from the media and Big Disinformation demanding accountability at Reddit.

Reddit has taken action in the past. Just a few weeks after the Jan. 6 riot, Reddit banned the “The_Donald” subreddit for harassment and targeting at the same time it also banned the raucous left-wing “ChapoTrapHouse” subreddit for similar reasons. However, Jan. 6 produced a censorious hysteria among media companies and Big Tech, and given the rhetoric and out-of-control subreddits that have flourished on the site since then, there’s little evidence Reddit management still cares about these issues.

Fixing Reddit would mean some pretty fundamental changes to how the site operates, particularly holding moderators accountable. Moderators are the only individuals who really have the power to break this cycle of escalating rhetoric and violence. Redditors as a group have demonstrated they’re incapable of self-moderation. Activist moderators need to be scrutinized and potentially have their privileges revoked. There should be increased moderator transparency.

Moderators, not the site’s owners and administrators, are who ultimately control the platform, and Reddit is going to pay for it dearly. Reddit is subject to the whims of unpaid moderators who have extreme control over the speech on the platform. Until that’s fixed, Reddit will remain a hotbed of radicalization and is likely to be associated with more violence in the future.

Share
Categories
Commentary Free Speech Just my own thoughts New Kid on the block Opinion Politics

The other side of Rights: Responsibilities.

The other side of Rights: Responsibilities.

By Paul Tiki.

This is kind of a riff on the excellent article written by Old Jarhead. The breakdown of what the founders were thinking and meaning with the concept of Rights was excellent. Rights are not just about what a person CAN do, but also what the government CANNOT do.

There is something else about Rights that is not spoken of, at least not enough, and certainly not in any organized fashion. There is a concept that was not brought up in my civics class in high school, nor was it mentioned in most of my later Political Science classes in college. For every Right you have and exercise, you also have a Responsibility.

To be clear, the Responsibility part of this is based more on Morals than on law, although there can be overlap. Most of the time, your Right to do something comes with the responsibility that you do not use your actions to infringe upon the Right of another citizen. This is where the law is most often involved. Here are some examples.
You have the right to free speech. You can say whatever you want. You have the Responsibility to not say something untrue that will harm another person’s ability to make a living, or damage their reputation in some way. We actually have laws on the books about this one for Slander (when the untruth is spoken) or Libel (when the untruth is written). You won’t go to jail for these, but you can be sued. Just ask President Trump and ABC and NBC if I recall correctly.

You have the Right to associate with who you wish. You have a Responsibility to not let such associations damage other people. This one is a bit nebulous, but here is an example. Your teenage kid is hanging out with that hooligan down the street. He has a Right to do so, but he also has the Responsibility to not participate in and even prevent (if possible) the hooligan from beating up another kid and taking his lunch money. I’m talking about teenagers here, but it also happens with adults, it’s just usually a bit more subtle.

Here is a big one. You have the Right to keep and bear arms. We are allowed by our constitution to buy, own, and use Arms, whether they are Firearms, Axes, Swords, or Pointy Sticks. This is one that the State loves to try to infringe in all sorts of ways. Theoretically, I should be able to carry a rapier on my hip. I suppose I still could, although law enforcement would likely call it probable cause for all manner of grief. The rapier isn’t a great example so let’s get to what the Right of the Second Amendment means and is commonly used for.

Firearms. Pistols, Rifles, Shotguns, Blunderbusses, Black Powder cannons, and so on. Arms, at the time of the Founding, meant all of these. Hell, if you had the money you could buy a frigate with 18 cannon and it be perfectly legal, even though you could, in theory, use it to destroy a small coastal city. But if you do choose to own some form of arms you also have a big Responsibility. You have to keep your arms from causing inappropriate harm. I stress inappropriate for a reason. To use a pistol in self defense is to cause harm appropriately. To use your Arms to stand up to tyranny is to cause harm appropriately. To leave a loaded pistol lying around where a toddler can get to it is where it can cause harm Inappropriately. That is just part of the Responsibility.

Knowing when and how to use it, not using your Arms to commit other crimes, and so on.
The right to peaceable assembly has been in the news a lot of late, in the form of various protests. You do have the right to go out and yell whatever damn fool thing you want and protest and so on. That’s fine. You have the Responsibility when you do so to NOT prevent other people from going and doing things that they need to do. You have a Responsibility to not get so carried away you set someplace on fire.

You have the Right to not incriminate yourself by what you tell the cops. You have the moral Responsibility to help them in most cases, or, at least, not actively hinder them while they are going about their legal and moral duties. This one is a little bit odd, because the Amendment in question was written to prevent an abuse of power common enough in various governments going back to the dawn of time. It’s there to prevent the government from compelling you to speak in a way that would get you in trouble. You see it again and again in modern cop shows or courtroom dramas where the evil government is trying to get some hapless victim to confess to a crime they didn’t commit so the real perpetrator can go free. Sadly that’s based on countless stories through history detailing the same thing.

I think you see where I am going with all of this. Yes, you do have the right to do a lot of things, but every single time you exercise that right, one should always consider, if only briefly, what the Responsibility is.
A very wise person once said “My Right to swing my fist ends where Your nose begins” Most of the Rights we enjoy are just like that. If you give it a moment’s thought, you should be able to figure it out if you just think about My Right, My Fist, and Your Nose.

Share
Categories
Commentary History Just my own thoughts New Kid on the block Opinion The Law

DEFINITIONS OF DEMOCRACY.

DEFINITIONS OF DEMOCRACY.

One way democracy can be defined is as the highest form of self determination. The latter concept could be defined as: 1) real control over one’s body 2) the right and the resources to satisfy one’s vital needs 3) the recognition of human interdependence & social rights & obligations.

Democracy can also be defined as a system of governing society in which laws, policies, and major political decisions are ostensibly determined by a numerical majority of the people in any given political jurisdiction.
However, we’ve seen where ‘the people’ can be defined as either an empowered numerical minority, legally classified as citizens, or a numerical majority socially-engineered by a ruling class.

In colonial America, e.g., and in the nation state which succeeded it, the slavocratic ruling class socially-engineered, over time, a numerical majority of the population classified-as-white, primarily through genocide and white supremacist immigration policies.

The U.S. is generally recognized as a ‘representative democracy’. Theoretically, laws are passed and policies and practices are implemented which, supposedly, express the will of the majority of people. In actuality they represent, more often than not, the will of the biggest benefactors, usually big corporations, wealthy families and individuals.

Major financial donors, not politicians, often write legislation in addition to threatening to cut off (and cutting off!) future campaign donations as retaliation for policies which go against their interests.

But the real antidemocratic elements of the U.S. electoral system are baked into the structure itself. . .

“. . .The hallowed 1787 parchment’s Electoral College system permits someone to ascend to the White House without winning a majority in the national popular presidential vote. Majority support is not required . . .The Electoral College significantly inflates the ‘democratic’ electoral voice of the nation’s most reactionary, white, racists, rural and ‘red’ (Republican) states.”
Paul Street

If we consider the malapportioned Senate, the undemocratically appointed Supreme Court, the gerrymandered U.S. House of Representatives, etc. and THE BIG MONEY in politics, the U.S. political system can not be accurately and honestly described as a democracy, in spite of honest and earnest efforts to make it one.

Share
Categories
Commentary Economy Education Elections New Kid on the block Opinion Politics

Another writer is on board.

Another writer is on board. Please welcome Christy

Chritsy is a first for Looking. Comes from the left. So please show her respect. She will be made a mod here so she will determine if your comments will stand. I only ask that you be civil and no name calling.

Share
Categories
Commentary New Kid on the block Opinion Politics

Another new writer

Another new writer

Please welcome Collectivist Action

Share
Categories
Free Speech New Kid on the block Opinion Politics The Law

Lawlessness.

Lawlessness, it has become a big problem in this country. From the petty thing as driving too fast, to the shameless antisemitism that is sweeping the country, to the trafficking of youngsters and women, to drugs that can kill an entire city, to politicians who act on insider information to the detriment of honest citizens who have no conduit to such information, to the defiance of lawful orders from law enforcement officers, these are but a few instances of the lawlessness that infects our Republic.
In an earlier time in the western US, vigilante justice often served as the only viable law in a near lawless society. It may not have been pretty, but it was effective. Is that where we are headed?

Judges who feel they have the right to hand down sentences that do not reflect the will of the people and juries who defend actions the American public view as heinous. Is this not judicial lawlessness?

Lawless activities by elected officials defies the very idea of a lawful society. Solon, the ancient Greek philosopher wrote, “To make an empire durable, the magistrates must obey the laws and the people the magistrates”. (638 – 558 BC) Does this not speak to the problem at hand?

I have no magic wand that I can wave and make this go away, but I do think that for We the People to ignore such activity can only lead to more acts of lawlessness.

An old cowboy saying comes to mind, “Half assed measures yield half assed results”.

Not to put too sharp a point on it, but; lawless acts erode the freedom of all law-abiding citizens.
Former Federal Judge Learned Hand said in a 1944 speech, “liberty did not mean the freedom to do as one likes. That is the denial of liberty, and leads straight to its overthrow, A society in which men recognize no check upon their freedom soon becomes a society where freedom is the possession of only a savage few”.

I for one, have no desire to live in such a society.

Walt Mow 2025

Share
Categories
New Kid on the block Opinion Politics

New here.

New here.

Please welcome Howdy to our list of writers. I’m sure many of you folks are familiar with him. Howdy is not shy

Share
Verified by MonsterInsights