But we were told that there was no voter fraud. San Joaquin Sheriff Discloses Massive Voter Roll Anomalies in California County

Thanks to KCRA and Gateway Pundit.

But we were told that there was no voter fraud. It still sticks in my mind of how this one loon from California claimed that it checked all 50 states and only found one case of voter fraud. And it was a Republican. SMH.

Last week, The Gateway Pundit reported on a press conference about the arrest of a Lodi city councilmember named Shakir Khan. The San Joaquin Sheriff discovered the election crimes while serving a search warrant for non-election related findings regarding Khan’s businesses in the city.

KCRA reported:

[Khan] is accused of stashing 41 ballots at his home. Investigators also say he registered 23 people to vote at his home and that his email and phone number were used to register 47 others. Body camera footage showed voters telling detectives how Khan allegedly pressured them to vote for him and how he allegedly falsified voter registration documents.

Towards the end of the press conference, before taking questions from the media, Captain Hardy addresses some discrepancies in the voter rolls they discovered during their investigation:

93 people registered w/ birthdate of 1850
232 registered at local prisons
4,144 voters registered over the age of 90 (there’s only 10.3k residents over 80 in that county…this number would drop off significantly at 90)
125 registered to a non-profit, NGO or business
~300 voters with no first name
110 potential double voters – same name, DOB, and address but different Voter ID numbers
people registered at various homeless shelters
and one voter registered named… “Jesus Christ”

Two of these issues have been scrutinized when found in other jurisdictions across the country: the 1850 birthdate (various other birthdates used) and the 90+ voter population.

This is the San Joaquin Sheriff conducting this investigation and disclosing this information to the public, so if there were an explanation for the 1850 birthdate relating to privacy protection, protected individuals, etc., it is likely they would have found this during their investigation. They did claim at the end they are working with the local registrar of voters.

As for the 90+ population, San Joaquin, according to the 2020 census, there are 751,615 people living in San Joaquin. In the 2010 Census, out of 308M Americans, 1.9M were over 90, or .6% of the population. Using that average for San Joaquin, it would mean there are approximately 4500 90+ citizens in the county. This is on track with the 4,144 registered to vote, however, this is assuming a near 100% registration rate among the age group. It also means that all of those individuals are eligible to vote.

Pass it on.

Related

By MC