Category: Free Speech

Categories
Commentary Crime Free Speech MSM Opinion Politics Trump

Did ABC and George commit a crime?

Where's the proof?
Did ABC and George commit a crime?
Saying that someone like a public figure is a criminal and has committed a crime or crimes, takes you into murky waters. Just ask ABC and George.

Yes, calling someone a “criminal” without proof can be considered slander, as it is a false statement that could significantly damage their reputation and is generally considered a defamatory statement per se, meaning it is automatically harmful and does not require additional proof of damage to be actionable in court. 

Key points to remember:
  • Slander is spoken defamation:

    When a false statement damaging someone’s reputation is spoken, it is considered slander. 

  • Defamation per se:

    Certain types of statements, like accusing someone of committing a crime, are considered “defamation per se” because they are inherently harmful and do not require additional proof of damage. 

  • Proof required:

    To successfully sue for slander, you must prove that the statement was false, published to a third party, made with at least a negligent mental state, and caused actual harm to the person’s reputation. 

Categories
Free Speech Just my own thoughts Leftist Virtue(!) Links from other news sources. Uncategorized WOKE

I want my Indian names and logos back.

Bring back our original names.

I want my Indian names and logos back.

Hopefully with an Adult back in the WH, he’ll put pressure on the schools, corporations, and sports teams to bring back the logos and Indian names.

Bring back the Indians name and logo, St. Johns Redman, Washington Redskins, Uncle Bens, Aunt Jimima, and others. Below is one example.

Not that long ago, Uncle Ben’s Rice was so proud of its backstory that it had a page dedicated to it on its website. It spoke of an actual man known as Uncle Ben, who was “an African American rice farmer known to rice millers in and around Houston for consistently producing the highest quality rice,” per Uncle Bens via Internet Archive. When original owner Gordon L. Harwell needed a new name for his new rice product, he borrowed Uncle Ben’s.

Categories
America's Heartland Commentary Free Speech Links from other news sources. Opinion Trump

Short and Sweet. Slim Shady has nothing compared to the Donald Trump Shuffle.

Winning the world over to the President Trump Shuffle.

Short and Sweet. Slim Shady has nothing compared to the Donald Trump Shuffle. Will we see the WOKE community hop on board the Trump train?

Joe’s running behind the Trump Train.

Donald Trump’s signature dance moves to the song Y.M.C.A has become a cultural phenomenon.

The President Trump shuffle is taking the country by storm, NFL, COLLEGE, AND EVEN HIGH SCHOOLS ARE HOPING ON BOARD. Even our allies from across the world. Get it.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1858267401533714552 https://twitter.com/i/status/1858248889574515122 https://twitter.com/i/status/1858260374077759504 https://twitter.com/i/status/1858260374077759504

https://x.com/i/status/1858240732437639260

https://twitter.com/i/status/1855712302776865219 https://twitter.com/i/status/1857816500930748552 https://twitter.com/i/status/1858189117307170979 https://twitter.com/i/status/1858189117307170979 https://twitter.com/i/status/1858166819544240607

Categories
Black Supremacy Commentary Free Speech How funny is this? Leftist Virtue(!) Links from other news sources.

How funny is this? Extremists flee X. DOOR SLAPS THEM IN THE ASS AS THEY FLEE.

Ladies and Gentleman the trash has left the building.

How funny is this? Extremists flee X. DOOR SLAPS THEM IN THE ASS AS THEY FLEE.

Liberals and Progressives have found BlueSky. Yes the obscure social media founded by the former Tweeter owner who has since left and asked folks to go back to X.

Many users consequently flocked there, although the platform has failed to gain any significant traction and is nothing more than a left-wing echo chamber.

Another platform frequented by those disillusioned with X is Mastodon, an open-source social network with aggressive censorship policies.

However, it appears that no single platform has yet to capture a significant market share. Given that X remains the only platform serving as a genuine public for all ideas and interests, don’t be surprised if these “disillusoned” leftists end up coming back with their tail between their legs.

Categories
America's Heartland Censorship Corruption Democrat Elections Free Speech Harris Harris Cartel Links from other news sources.

You make the call. Was or wasn’t he?

Republican vice presidential nominee Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance outside the Primanti Bros restaurant in North Versailles, Pennsylvania after being barred from meeting Trump supporters inside, screen image via Anissa Zappala, X Twitter, September 28, 2024.

You make the call. Was or wasn’t he? There was a stink about weather JD Vance and his followers weren’t welcome at a restaurant I know so well. A former  customer of mine.

To me the evidence is here in these tweets and Corporates statement on what happened. Was or wasn’t he and his supporters denied full access to the restaurant. You make the call.

Person in the restaurant as JD got to the Restaurant.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1840157762338066739 https://twitter.com/i/status/1840077881113809276 https://twitter.com/i/status/1840157390026539490 https://twitter.com/i/status/1840065843046044025

The corporate response.

Categories
Biden Biden Cartel Black Supremacy Commentary Corruption Democrat Free Speech Harris Harris Cartel Hate Leftist Virtue(!) Lies Links from other news sources.

Progressive Supremacists are responsible for the Trump assassination attempts.

The Coconspirators? President Trump speaks at a rally in Johnstown, PA, August 30, 2024, photo by Kristinn Taylor.

Progressive Supremacists are responsible for the Trump assassination attempts. White and Black Progressive Supremacists to be exact. You find them in Hollywood, MSM, and in the Democrat Party.

Look at their comments about Trump since his announcement in 2015 that he was running for President.? What can be worse than the Hitler comparisons?

Below are the anti-Trump quotes associated with each Democrat:

Credit: Trump Campaign/ @greg_price11
Credit: Trump Campaign/ @greg_price11
Credit: Trump Campaign/ @greg_price11

Here are the all the Democrats and their enablers listed in the press release:

Kamala Harris
Joe Biden
Tim Walz
Gwen Walz
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (CA)
Rep. Jasmine Crockett (TX)
Rep. Dan Goldman (NY)
Former Biden Staffer TJ Ducklo
Liz Cheney
Rep. Steve Cohen (TN)
Rep. Maxine Waters (CA)
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL)
Rep. Adam Schiff (CA)
Rep. Gregory Meeks (NY)
Rep. Jake Auchincloss (MA)
Rep. Abigail Spanberger (VA)
Rep. Annie Kuster (NH)
Rep. Becca Balint (VT)
Rep. Jason Crow (CO)
Rep. Raul Grijalva (AZ)
Sen. Michael Bennet (CO)
Rep. Stacey Plaskett (USVI)
Rep. Steven Horsford (NV)
Rep. Gabe Vasquez (NM)
Rep. Mike Levin (CA)
Rep. Eric Sorenson (IL)
Rep. Greg Landsman (OH)
Rep. Pat Ryan (NY)
Rick Wilson, The Lincoln Project
Former Biden staffer Kate Bedingfield
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (NY)
Rachel Vindman, wife of Trump-Ukraine impeachment conspirator Alexander Vindman.
Rep. Mikie Sherrill (NJ)
State Rep. Steven Woodrow (D-CO)
NBC’s Lester Holt

Categories
Biden Biden Cartel Censorship Free Speech Government Overreach Harris Harris Cartel Links from other news sources.

What do Brazil, Iran, China, North Korea, and the Harris-Biden administration have in common? Government weaponization against Free Speech.

Dictators posing together. Brazil President Lula and U.S. President Joe Biden (Getty)

What do Brazil, Iran, China, North Korea, and the Harris-Biden administration have in common? Government weaponization against Free Speech.

All the above-mentioned Countries have banned X. So why add Harris-Biden to that list? Well so far the US hasn’t, but there are reports that the US has worked with Brazil covertly to ban X.

President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, along with Democrats haven’t formally denounced Brazil’s censorship of X because they “not only support the censorship but have also been directly funding it,” investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger claimed Sunday.

“The Biden administration and Democrats have played an influential role in instigating censorship in Brazil,” Shellenberger wrote in a piece for Public, which he shared on his X account. “The FBI went to Brazil and gave its Supreme Court justices advice on how to censor its population. The US government has been funding many of the NGOs in Brazil that have demanded censorship since the election of a populist president there in 2018.”

Liberal reporter Michael Shellenberger wrote this for Public.

Categories
Back Door Power Grab Biden Cartel Commentary Education Free Speech Harris Harris Cartel History Just my own thoughts Leftist Virtue(!) Life Links from other news sources. Opinion Politics

What it means when a school district bans patriotism because of how it looks.

Edmond North High School senior Caleb Horst said school officials told him he could not fly the US flag from his truck. (istock)

What it means when a school district bans patriotism because of how it looks.

Recently we have been seeing where schools are banning or disciplining students because they’re proud to be an American. The latest case being in Oklahoma involving the American flag.

Be it a flag or apparel, the excuses are the same. It may offend someone or it may cause violent reactions. What that tells me is that the school has students who are a threat to Democracy and they’re the ones who the schools should be going after.

Categories
America's Heartland Commentary Economy Education Elections Free Speech Links from other news sources. Reprints from others.

Winning. Reuters: Newsmax Is Top US News Brand

Newsmax is growing. Getty Photo

Winning. Reuters: Newsmax Is Top US News Brand

A new Reuters study found that Newsmax is one of the influential news brands in the U.S.

Earlier this week, the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism released its annual Digital News Report, surveying 100,000 people across 47 countries.

The Reuters U.S. survey found Americans are turning to just 12 news brands offline for news.

And Newsmax was one of them.

Reuters found that 8% of Americans — about 25 million Americans — turn to Newsmax for their news at least weekly.

Newsmax ranked close to well-known news brands like The Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and The New York Times.

“Newsmax’s rise is even more stunning considering the newness of our brand, Big Tech efforts to thwart us, and several virtual TV distributors still keeping us from their subscribers,” Chris Ruddy, CEO of Newsmax, said.

Newsmax started as a digital media company in 1998 and a decade ago launched a cable news channel.

Today, the cable channel is available on all major cable systems and through its proprietary app on Newsmax+.

Newsmax also launched Newsmax2, a streaming news channel.

The Reuters study also found that Newsmax is taking close to 30% of Fox News’ total audience.

The Reuters study did not include Newsmax’s significant reach online through its popular app, its website Newsmax.com, and its massive social media following on platforms like Facebook, X, and Truth Social.

Newsmax estimates it reaches 40 million American regularly through all its platforms.

Other surveys have also found Newsmax’s brand is rising and resonating among U.S. consumers.

Last year, the Economist/YouGov annual survey of Trust in Media found Newsmax was among the most trusted cable news brands, ranking with outlets like CNN, MSNBC, Fox, and Bloomberg.

Last week, Newsmax announced that it plans to make a public offering later this year with a listing on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq.

The company cited significant investor interest and its strong growth in ratings and revenues as helping to make the decision to go public.

Newsmax said its revenues have grown over 330% since 2019 and its cable TV and online ratings have been strong.

Nielsen reported that in 2023 Newsmax was the only cable news channel to see significant ratings growth across all dayparts, making it the fourth-highest-rated cable news channel in the nation.

Article originally was found on Newmax

Categories
Biden Biden Cartel Censorship Commentary Corruption Free Speech Leftist Virtue(!) Links from other news sources. Politics

Victory in Federal Lawsuit Against New Hampshire Library That Fired State Representative for Her Political Views – Library Admits That It Violated the First Amendment.

Beating them at their own game.

Victory in Federal Lawsuit Against New Hampshire Library That Fired State Representative for Her Political Views – Library Admits That It Violated the First Amendment.

So this librarian on her own time outside of work (unlike a part time coffeemaker) was fired (coffeemaker demoted) for endorsing candidates for office. She was rehired, but a lesson needed to be taught. This is where the ACLJ stepped in.

The court’s consent decree, in our case, does exactly that. First, the library is now obligated to publicly admit what it did; the order includes a statement that Arlene was terminated “because she engaged in off duty, public, expressive, political activity, outside the scope of her employment with the Library.”

Second, the library agreed to make the following public statement admitting wrongdoing:

The Dudley-Tucker Library regrets its conduct toward Quaratiello and the violation of Plaintiff Quaratiello’s constitutional rights, and will remind, in writing, all personnel to refrain from engaging in disciplinary activity that punishes the First Amendment activities of employees. The Dudley-Tucker Library and Town of Raymond will take any other actions reasonably necessary to ensure this type of constitutional violation does not occur again.

Third, the court entered an order that will ensure our client’s rights are protected in the future. This order does the following five things: (1) it declares that the termination of Rep. Quaratiello “for her political activity constituted a violation of her First Amendment rights”; (2) it orders the defendants to expunge any negative documents relating to this incident from their employee files; (3) it enjoins the defendants “from disciplining Plaintiff Quaratiello or other similarly situated employees for off-duty political speech and activity that does not occur using Library resources or time”; (4) it requires the library to “reiterate to all employees that Library policy cannot and does not prohibit employees from engaging in off-duty, constitutionally-protected political activity”; and (5) it requires an addition to the employee handbook acknowledging these fundamental rights.

The whole article can be found here.