Any threat especially against law enforcement or politicians will get you banned. Skip to the content
Looking at today's world
The world as we see it.

      Category: Medicine

      Categories
      Child Abuse COVID Drugs How sick is this? Medicine Project Veritas Science

      #Pfertility: Study Funded By The NIH Finds That 40.2% Of Vaccinated Women Experienced Menstrual Changes

      • Post author By Phoenix
      • Post date February 4, 2023
      • No Comments on #Pfertility: Study Funded By The NIH Finds That 40.2% Of Vaccinated Women Experienced Menstrual Changes
      Side effects include a multitude of things the shot should NOT be doing.

      Hits: 31

      That means that over 40 million women in the United States have had their menstrual cycles affected by the C19 jab.

      Project Veritas released another breaking story last night (Feb. 2) featuring Pfizer executive Jordan Trishton Walker. This time, he was caught on camera openly admitting concern about women’s cycles and their fertility. As a result, #Pfertility is trending on Twitter.

      BREAKING: @Pfizer Director Concerned Over Women's Reproductive Heath After COVID-19 Vaccinations

      "There is something irregular about their menstrual cycles…concerning…The vaccine shouldn't be interfering with that…It has to be affecting something hormonal…"#Pfertility pic.twitter.com/XAuMPJNShD

      — Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) February 2, 2023

      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      .

      In light of Project Veritas’ latest bombshell, we have compiled an array of respected voices speaking out about menstrual and fertility concerns. Doctors, scientists, thought leaders, and women across the globe have been screaming from the rooftops on this subject for years now.

      (In the interest of brevity, I’ll just post the videos from Vigalent Fox [there are quite a few]. The full article, with Twitter comments, can be found HERE , Some may be out of order —TPR)

      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      play-sharp-fill
      Link
      Basically, Pfizer knew that there would be problems, they knew that lipid nanoparticles such as in the clot shot accumulated in the ovaries, and Bill Gates (bless his heart) was studying ways to interfere with reproduction.

      WILL THESE PEOPLE EVER BE PUNISHED?

      60

      Share this:

      • Twitter
      • Facebook
      Like Loading...
      15k
      SHARES
      ShareTweet
      • Tags Genocide?

      Categories
      Biden Pandemic COVID Drugs Medicine Science

      So who’s pulling the strings? Vimeo Cancels The Wellness Company’s Account After Episode On Ivermectin

      • Post author By Phoenix
      • Post date January 19, 2023
      • No Comments on So who’s pulling the strings? Vimeo Cancels The Wellness Company’s Account After Episode On Ivermectin
      The Wellness Company

      Hits: 22

      Although the pandemic is behind us, Big Tech is still censoring health information from the public.

      The video hosting company Vimeo recently deleted the channel of The Wellness Company.

      The Wellness Company is a startup with a “Freedom From Pharma” program that provides access to doctors and pharmacies that aren’t afraid to provide treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (plus, Gateway Pundit benefits when you subscribe through this link or the links below).

      In fact, it was a video on ivermectin that caused the deletion, according to The Wellness Company.

      Chris Alexander of The Wellness Company said:

      “Vimeo banned our account on the basis of an interview with Jen VanDeWater, a licensed pharmacist who runs our Freedom from Pharma program, about the safety and utility of Ivermectin.

      “Vimeo has allowed pro-vaccination voices to post video after video that have been riddled with misinformation, disinformation and outright lies. Vimeo isn’t holding any of these people accountable and none of these accounts are being suspended or permanently banned.

      “The actions of Vimeo are a reminder of why it is so important for conservatives and freedom loving Americans to build parallel systems. We can no longer rely on the compromised systems of the establishment – and that is exactly why we founded The Wellness Company.

      “Nothing is more critical than healthcare and no system has been more exposed over the last three years than our healthcare system. Every American who cares about the truth and who cares about their health should join us!”

      Here’s the video link (via Rumble): https://rumble.com/v23rv2a-twc-med-talks-episode-5.html

      The Wellness Company was recently created as a “brand new model” for our healthcare system.

      It is a network of doctors (including Dr. Peter McCullough) and pharmacies to get pro-freedom doctors and patients what they need.

      Anyone can join their “Freedom From Pharma” Plan and get:

      — a personal doctor of pharmacy

      — a “de-prescribing” plan

      — coaching and access to a team of pro-freedom specialists


      They’ve lost control of Twitter, and possibly Facebook as well. So who is paying off Vimeo to censor the truth?

       

      66

      Share this:

      • Twitter
      • Facebook
      Like Loading...
      15k
      SHARES
      ShareTweet

      Categories
      Biden Pandemic COVID Drugs Medicine Reprints from others.

      Risk of Sudden Hearing Loss Doubled in the Elderly After COVID Shots -Report

      • Post author By Phoenix
      • Post date December 22, 2022
      • No Comments on Risk of Sudden Hearing Loss Doubled in the Elderly After COVID Shots -Report
      Ear infection concept. an inflammatory disease of the middle ear.

      Hits: 47

      The hits just keep coming from these shots – is this the new definition of  “safe and effective?”

      By Dr. Peter A. McCullough Dec 20, 2022

      Loss of hearing in the elderly is common affecting both the patient and the people around them trying to communicate.

      I have noticed many of my vaccinated elderly patients developing progressive hearing loss. Nieminen et al have conducted an extensive hearing assessment of patients in Finland after COVID-19 vaccination and compared them to the unvaccinated. The data suggested each successive shot increased risk for hearing loss. However, the most important results are in the supplemental tables which demonstrate the elderly and those with risk factors for hearing loss are pushed over the edge by COVID-19 vaccination.

      Nieminen TA, Kivekäs I, Artama M, Nohynek H, Kujansivu J, Hovi P. Sudden Hearing Loss Following Vaccination Against COVID-19. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Published online December 15, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4154

      Their risk for sudden and substantial loss of hearing is more than double those who wisely deferred on the vaccines.

      The Spike protein produced by the vaccines is a neurotoxin damaging nerves throughout the body and likely having more of an impact in nervous tissue which is already degenerated such as the auditory nerve. It is also possible the Spike protein incites inflammation leading to fibrosis in the tissue holding the stapes or stirrup which is a bone in the middle ear, the annular ligament, or the oval window all involved in the conduction of sound vibrations to the inner ear.

      If you have an elderly person in your circle who has been vaccinated, check on their hearing and do not fall behind on progressive hearing loss which if unchecked, can lead to social withdrawal and insidious depression.

      Reposted from the author’s Substack

      Nieminen TA, Kivekäs I, Artama M, Nohynek H, Kujansivu J, Hovi P. Sudden Hearing Loss Following Vaccination Against COVID-19. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Published online December 15, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4154

      Is there a counter-vax to the Covid vaxxes?
      124

      Share this:

      • Twitter
      • Facebook
      Like Loading...
      13k
      SHARES
      ShareTweet

      Categories
      COVID Crime Drugs How sick is this? Medicine The Courts

      A ‘Cover-Up of Evidence of Mass Murder’: The CDC Removing VAERS Records ?

      • Post author By Phoenix
      • Post date December 21, 2022
      • No Comments on A ‘Cover-Up of Evidence of Mass Murder’: The CDC Removing VAERS Records ?

      Hits: 26

      “It’s not an accident they would do this.”

      By: The Vigilant Fox  (a citizen journalist with 12 years of healthcare experience, focused on The Great Reset, world protests, and COVID-19.) December 21, 2022

      Video available on Rumble

      Something strange is going on with the VAERS system. Reports that were present three months ago are now inexplicably missing. And fewer than 4% of adverse events recorded in V-Safe have made their way to VAERS. This is the CDC’s database; Rochelle Walensky is in charge of it. And their failure to properly manage VAERS is suppressing the already-alarming safety signal of the Covid-19 shots.

      Fifty deaths pulled the swine flu vaxx off the market. Covid-19 vaxxes caused FIFTY deaths by January 2021!

      Now, what is VAERS? VAERS stands for Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. As mentioned earlier, VAERS is a database put in place in 1990 under the supervision of the CDC. Reports of suspected vaccine adverse events take about half an hour to fill out, and 86% of the time, this is done by a doctor, nurse, paramedic, coroner, or healthcare professional in which he or she believes the adverse event is related to a vaccine reaction. And because of its lengthy report process as well as the lack of awareness of the existence of VAERS, there is a general consensus of a severe underreporting factor for this database.

      To get a better idea of what’s going on with the CDC’s handling of the VAERS system, Dr. Naomi Wolf spoke with Dr. Henry Ealy, an expert on the database.

      Dr. Henry Ealy is the Founder & Executive Community Director for the Energetic Health Institute. He holds a Doctorate in naturopathic medicine and has been at the tip of the spear on the Grand Jury front — taking action to bring forth a Grand Jury investigation of the CDC for allegations of criminal data fraud and willful misconduct.

      “You mentioned that V-Safe should be added to VAERS, but only 4% of V-Safe [adverse events have been] added. Can you explain what that means to people and why it matters?” asked Dr. Wolf.

      Dr. Ealy explained, “VAERS is designed specifically for medical professionals and people alike to report, ‘Hey, I got hurt.’ And when enough people have gotten hurt for officials to look at it and say, ‘Hey, this product isn’t safe; it’s got to come off the market.’ V-Safe was created (by the CDC) to also do something similar to that — and to make that process a little bit easier. You don’t need as much information to record a report in V-Safe.”

      By streamlining the process, the CDC got inundated with adverse event reports from the Covid-19 shot. Out of the 10,108,273 individual users, 800,000 had an adverse event — or about 1 in 13. And of those 800,000 V-Safe reports, only 30,492 have been logged into VAERS.

      Dr. Ealy continues, “In V-safe, there have been over 800,000 reports of injury. And the deal was that in V-Safe, every single report of injury was supposed to also then subsequently have a VAERS report associated with it. So that means all 800,000 should be in VAERS. But unfortunately, or by design — however you want to look at it — only just over 30,000 of those 800,000 have been recorded in VAERS. So what that means is that fewer than 4% of the records in V-Safe have actually been reported in VAERS as they were supposed to be done.”

      “What a sneaky way to basically sweep almost 800,000 adverse events under the rug,” remarked Dr. Wolf.

      “Adverse events, hospitalizations, permanent injuries, deaths — compromises [the] dataset,” replied Dr. Ealy.

      “That’s so disgusting!” exclaimed Dr. Wolf.

      To add insult to injury, not only are the bulk of V-Safe reports not making their way to VAERS, but Dr. Ealy suspects that VAERS reports are being removed.

      What were 45,388 reports three months ago has now inexplicably dropped down to 12,544.

      Specifically, he notes that between September 2022 and December 2022, the CDC has removed at least 32,844 records of injury related to the following conditions: myocarditis, pericarditis, and heart inflammation. What were 45,388 reports three months ago has now inexplicably dropped down to 12,544.

      Note the different totals between first chart and this one

      Dr. Ealy stresses he’s “triple-checked this,” and he stands by the allegation that they are removing or obfuscating records.

      Dr. Jessica Rose has also reported similar issues with VAERS. She wrote on November 19, “The foreign data set was gutted this week in VAERS, and the cancer signal was halved. The myocarditis dose three response signal was lost, and 994 spontaneous abortions/stillbirths were dropped.”

      So, from two credible sources, it is appears that the CDC is removing records.

      “It’s not an accident they would do this,” attested Dr. Ealy. “With Dr. Ladapo and Governor DeSantis coming out with that study about myocarditis and pericarditis, they’re trying to do everything they can to delete records to thwart what Governor DeSantis and (Florida) Surgeon General Dr. Ladipo are doing.”

      “I’m stunned,” expressed Dr. Wolf. “This is as big as the Pentagon Papers, easily, if indeed the CDC deleted those records. I’ve seen the screenshots; it looks pretty bad. And so, you’re saying that Dr. Ladapo and Governor DeSantis calling for a Grand Jury investigation could be the reason that they’re deleting these, basically, evidence of their crimes? Because Ladapo and DeSantis will be investigating that data? Is that what you’re saying?”

      “Right,” confirmed Dr. Ealy. “When you read through the Grand Jury petition that Governor DeSantis signed and submitted to the Florida Supreme Court, they are putting a lot of what their argument based upon their findings with myocarditis. So myocarditis and pericarditis — and that’s not without good reason.”

      Dr. Ealy continues, “So the issue is — if you’re the CDC now — and you know you’ve been complicit in data fraud from day one, what do you start doing? Well, you’ve been deleting records for the last couple of years. Why not delete the records specific for myocarditis and pericarditis to try to thwart their attempts and try to discredit their analysis of what they’re doing? That’s what it looks like to me right now.”

      “That’s many felonies!” exclaimed Dr. Wolf. “That’s not just a felony in terms of data handling — that’s a felony in terms of the criminal process, right? Isn’t that covering up evidence of a crime?

      “Well, yeah. It would definitely [be],” replied Dr. Ealy.

      The problem with VAERS as a federal system is yes, maybe if there is an erroneous record here or there, you should have the ability to delete it. But when you started seeing the CDC deleting hundreds of thousands of records and removing, in this case, over 32,000 records, or at least removing the search term. That’s my suspicion here — that they didn’t delete the record. What they deleted was that word — ‘myocarditis’ or ‘pericarditis or ‘heart inflammation’ in the actual report. And so, that’s modification of official records. And when you do that, that’s now criminal fraud — again. And, of course, it throws off our ability to really understand what’s going on with this because we rely on systems like this to give us information for making decisions.”

      Dr. Wolf argues the CDC’s actions appear to be a “cover-up of evidence of mass murder.”

      And she pleas Governor DeSantis and Surgeon General Ladapo to get in touch with Dr. Ealy’s team “because what you all have uncovered is absolutely stunning.” “And this latest, which you’ve presented, should be on the cover of every newspaper and every magazine and every news site in the world. This is huge if, indeed, they’re concealing myocarditis outcomes.”

       

      92

      Share this:

      • Twitter
      • Facebook
      Like Loading...
      13k
      SHARES
      ShareTweet

      Categories
      Biden Pandemic COVID Medicine Opinion Reprints from others. Science

      New Autopsy Report Reveals Those Who Died Suddenly Were Likely Killed by the COVID Vaccine

      • Post author By Phoenix
      • Post date December 14, 2022
      • No Comments on New Autopsy Report Reveals Those Who Died Suddenly Were Likely Killed by the COVID Vaccine

      Hits: 43

      (Anatta_Tan/Shutterstock)
      December 8, 2022 Updated: December 14, 2022

      A major new autopsy report has found that three people who died unexpectedly at home with no pre-existing disease shortly after COVID vaccination were likely killed by the vaccine.

      A further two deaths were found to be possibly due to the vaccine.

      The report, published in Clinical Research in Cardiology, the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, detailed autopsies carried out at Heidelberg University Hospital in 2021. Led by Thomas Longerich and Peter Schirmacher, it found that in five deaths that occurred within a week of the first or second dose of vaccination with Pfizer or Moderna, inflammation of the heart tissue due to an autoimmune response triggered by the vaccine had likely or possibly caused the death.

      Epoch Times Photo
      Case characteristic of five deaths likely or possibly caused by the COVID vaccines.
      Epoch Times Photo
      Lymphocyte immune cells (white blood cells) are shown in blue and brown among the heart tissue, causing localised inflammation that proved fatal.

      In total the report looked at 35 autopsies carried out at the University of Heidelberg in people who died within 20 days of COVID vaccination, of which 10 were deemed on examination to be due to a pre-existing illness and not the vaccine. For the remaining 20, the report did not rule out the vaccine as a cause of death, which Dr. Schirmacher has confirmed to me is intentional as the autopsy results were inconclusive. Almost all of the remaining cases were of a cardiovascular cause, as indicated in the table below from the supplementary materials, where 21 of the 30 deaths are attributed to a cardiovascular cause. One of these is attributed to blood clots (VITT) from AstraZeneca vaccination (the report was looking specifically at post-vaccine myocarditis deaths), leaving 20 from other cardiovascular causes.

      Epoch Times Photo

      For the five deaths in the main report attributed as likely or possibly due to the vaccines, the authors state:

      “All cases lacked significant coronary heart disease, acute or chronic manifestations of ischaemic heart disease, manifestations of cardiomyopathy or other signs of a pre-existing, clinically relevant heart disease.”

      This indicates that the authors limited themselves to deaths where there was no “pre-existing, clinically relevant heart disease,” making the report very conservative in which deaths it was willing to pin on the vaccines.

      Dr. Schirmacher told me:

      “We included only cases, in which the constellation was unequivocally clear and no other cause of death was demonstrable despite all efforts. We cannot rule out vaccine effects in the other cases, but here we had an alternative potential cause of death (e.g., myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism). If there is severe ischemic cardiomyopathy it is almost impossible to rule out myocarditis effects or definitively rule in inflammatory alterations as due to vaccination. These cases were not included.

      “We did not aim to include or find every case but the characteristics of definitive, unequivocal cases beyond any doubt. Only by this way you can establish the typical characteristics; otherwise less strict criteria may lead to ‘contamination’ of the collective; it is absolutely plausible that by these criteria we may have missed further cases but the intention of our study was never quantitative or extrapolation and there are numerous positive and negative bias. But we wanted to establish the fact not the size.”

      It is of course very possible that the vaccines also cause death where there is an underlying cardiovascular condition, and indeed, that it is more likely to do so. Thus these five deaths are the minimum from these autopsy cases in which the vaccines are involved—those in which there is no other plausible explanation.

      It is worth noting here that initially in 2021, when the autopsies were first carried out, Dr. Schirmacher stated that his team had concluded 30–40 percent of the deaths were due to the vaccines. These earlier estimates may give us a better indication of how many of the deaths the authors really think are attributable to the vaccines, when they are unconstrained by highly conservative assumptions (and looking at causes besides myocarditis). Note that these percentages are based on a selection of deaths that occurred shortly after vaccination, not a random sample of all deaths, so the authors rightly warn that no estimation of individual risk can be made from them.

      Did the autopsies find spike protein from the vaccines present in the heart tissue? The samples from the five vaccine-attributed deaths were tested for infectious agents including SARS-CoV-2 (in one instance revealing “low viral copy numbers” of a herpes virus, which the authors deemed insufficient to explain the inflammation). However, no tests were done specifically for the virus spike protein or nucleocapsid protein, such as have been used successfully in other autopsies to aid attribution to the vaccine, so unfortunately this evidence was unavailable for these autopsies.

      The autopsies in the report also only cover doses 1 and 2, not any booster doses, and only deaths within 20 days of vaccination, so the report doesn’t address directly the question of what’s been causing the elevated heart deaths since the booster rollouts from autumn 2021 or whether the vaccines can trigger cardiovascular death weeks or months later. (Other autopsies have confirmed that the spike protein can persist in the body for weeks or months after vaccination and trigger a fatal autoimmune attack on the heart.)

      What the report does do, however, is establish that people who die suddenly in the days immediately following vaccination may well have died from a vaccine-related autoimmune attack on the heart. It also confirms how deadly even mild vaccine-induced myocarditis can be—and thus why studies like the one from Thailand, found cardiovascular adverse effects in around a third of teenagers (29.2 percent) following Pfizer vaccination and subclinical heart inflammation in one in 43 (2.3 percent), and the study from Switzerland finding at least 2.8 percent with subclinical myocarditis and elevated troponin levels (indicating heart injury) across all vaccinated people, are so worrying.

      The authors of the new study diplomatically write that the “reported incidence” of myocarditis after vaccination is “low” and the risks of hospitalization and death associated with COVID-19 are “stated to be greater than the recorded risk associated with COVID-19 vaccination”—notably declining to commit themselves to the official propositions that they dutifully repeat.

      The fact that those who die suddenly after vaccination may have died from the hidden effects of the COVID vaccine on their heart is thus now firmly established in the medical literature. The big remaining question is how often it occurs.

      Stop Press: Dr. John Campbell has produced a helpful overview of the report’s findings in his latest video.

      video
      play-sharp-fill
      Link

      We’ve suspected this for some time, now we have proof,
      125

      Share this:

      • Twitter
      • Facebook
      Like Loading...
      15.1k
      SHARES
      ShareTweet

      Categories
      COVID Links from other news sources. Medicine Reprints from others. Science

      A Review of Criticisms of a ProPublica-Vanity Fair Story on a COVID Origins Report

      • Post author By MC
      • Post date December 8, 2022
      • No Comments on A Review of Criticisms of a ProPublica-Vanity Fair Story on a COVID Origins Report
      Researcher Toy Reid sits before a timeline chronicling the lead-up to the pandemic at the Hart Senate Office Building in Washington. Credit: Mark Peterson/Redux for Vanity Fair

      Hits: 21

      ProPublica and Vanity Fair are left wing, but this ProPublica article states something that most folks didn’t even know existed. the origins of COVID-19 released by the Republican oversight staff of a Senate committee. Here’s another shocker. Our examination affirms that the story, and the totality of reporting it marshals, is sound. So please read the complete article. I’ll give my assessment in the comments section.

      by Stephen Engelberg Nov. 30, 11 a.m. EST

      On Oct. 28, ProPublica and Vanity Fair published a story about an interim report on the origins of COVID-19 released by the Republican oversight staff of a Senate committee. The interim report was the product of a far-reaching investigation into the question of how the pandemic began, and we wanted to give readers an inside view of the team’s work and share independent experts’ views of its findings.

      The debate over COVID-19’s origins has been contentious from the start, and the report’s conclusion that the pandemic was “more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident” triggered criticism. Scientists, China observers and others questioned the Senate team’s findings and our reporting about them.

      Over the past several weeks, reporters and editors at both publications have taken a hard look at those criticisms.

      Our examination affirms that the story, and the totality of reporting it marshals, is sound.

      We re-interviewed some of our original sources and reached out to other specialists to address questions that were raised about the work we did to put in context the evidence cited by the interim report. In particular, we took a close look at how Toy Reid, a State Department political officer on loan to the committee, translated a Chinese Communist Party branch dispatch that was cited in both the interim report and in our story as evidence that staff at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) may have been responding to a biosafety hazard or breach.

      We commissioned three Chinese language experts with impeccable credentials who were not involved in the original story to review Reid’s translation. They all agreed that his version was a plausible way to represent the passage, though two also said they would have translated the words to refer to the dangers of day-to-day lab operations. The third produced a translation that was in line with Reid’s. All agreed the passage was ambiguous. We have updated the story to underscore the complexity of interpreting that dispatch.

      We have added additional context to the story. We have also identified two factual errors inconsequential to the premise of the story. They have been corrected.

      It remains clear that in 2019, the WIV was addressing serious safety issues while scientists there faced pressure to perform. Risky coronavirus research took place in laboratories that lacked the maximum biocontainment safeguards, according to the interim report.

      A series of WIV patents and procurement notices “suggest that the WIV experienced persistent biosafety problems relevant to the containment of an aerosolized respiratory virus like SARS-CoV-2,” the interim report says. On Nov. 19, 2019, the same day a senior government safety official arrived at the WIV to discuss what a meeting summary described as a “complex and grave situation currently facing [bio]security work,” the WIV sought to procure a costly air incinerator. One expert told us such equipment could be used as a “quick fix” if the HEPA air filtration system had failed in some way. A few weeks after that procurement notice, the WIV filed a patent application for an improved device to contain hazardous gases inside a biological chamber, like ones used to transport infected animals.

      The interim report described the WIV’s struggles to find disinfectants that were effective enough to kill dangerous pathogens without corroding metal. In November 2020, with the pandemic well under way, the WIV filed a patent application for a new disinfectant. The patent said existing disinfectants corrode metals in ways that could allow pathogens to escape, “resulting in loss of life and property and serious social problems.”

      The director of the WIV’s highest-level biosecurity lab acknowledged in September 2019 that some Chinese facilities researching dangerous viruses had “insufficient operational funds for routine yet vital processes.” Dr. Gerald Parker, a biosecurity health expert and adviser to the interim report, said he found such revelations “a recipe for disaster.” He added: “You further couple that with an authoritarian regime where you could be penalized for reporting safety issues. You are in a doom loop of pressure to produce, and if something goes wrong you may not be incentivized to report.”

      We continue to see our story as a measured exploration of the array of questions raised about the WIV’s laboratories. The possibility that a biosecurity breach at the WIV occurred, and sparked the pandemic, remains plausible.

      We plan to keep reporting on this issue and expect new evidence to emerge. It is our view that both the natural-spillover and laboratory-accident hypotheses for the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic merit continued investigation. Given the human toll, which continues to mount, it is imperative that we continue this work.

      For those who want to know more details about our exploration of issues raised, our reporting methodologies and conclusions, we are providing more information below on:

      • Translations and interpretations.
      • The corrections and added context.
      • Our thoughts on exploring the lab leak theory.

       

      More on the Translations and Interpretations

      After the Vanity Fair-ProPublica story appeared online, questions began to emerge on social media about Reid’s translation of a key passage of a Chinese Communist Party branch dispatch dated Nov. 12, 2019, on the WIV website. According to Reid’s translation, it begins by pointing out that the lab works with dangerous pathogens and that once the test tubes are opened, “it is just as if having opened Pandora’s Box.” While the lab had “various preventive and protective measures,” it was nonetheless important to “avoid operational errors that give rise to dangers.”

      The next phrase was the focus of the criticism. It appeared in bold letters in the interim report:

      “Every time this has happened, the members of the Zhengdian Lab [BSL4] Party Branch have always run to the frontline, and they have taken real action to mobilize and motivate other research personnel.”

      Our story shared Reid’s thought process. We wrote:

      “Reid studied the words intently. Was this a reference to past accidents? An admission of an ongoing crisis? A general recognition of hazardous practices? Or all of the above?”

      Reid recognized that there was an ambiguity in the phrase he translated as “Every time this has happened.” Did the word “this” refer to the daily dangers of doing experiments in a lab that handles deadly pathogens? Or did it point to the “operational errors that give rise to dangers”?

      Before we published our story, Reid told us he found the passage to have a defensive tone. In the story, we quote Reid as concluding, “They are almost saying they know Beijing is about to come down and scream at them.”

      Seven days later, on Nov. 19, a senior Chinese official arrived from Beijing to the WIV for a small, high-level safety training. A meeting summary said that the official had come bearing important oral remarks and written instructions from China’s senior leaders, including General Secretary Xi Jinping, related to “the complex and grave situation currently facing [bio]security work.”

      To Reid, the mention of instructions from party leaders and reference to a “complex and grave situation” reinforced that the Nov. 12 dispatch was an attempt by the party branch to deflect criticism for something that had gone awry, as he explained.

      We interviewed three experts on Chinese Communist Party communications before publication and shared with them the dispatches as they appeared in Chinese on the WIV website. We conducted the interviews on background to get their candid input. They expressed concerns regarding personal safety, given the sensitivity of the subject matter. All agreed with Reid’s interpretation that the safety training on Nov. 19, 2019, as described in the meeting summary, appeared to be urgent, nonroutine and related to some sort of biosafety emergency.

      To assess the criticisms of Reid’s work that were raised after the story was published, we commissioned three Chinese translators, each with more than a decade of experience. One has translated for officials at the highest levels of the American and Chinese governments. We wanted their objective view of what the passage said, so we asked them to translate it and did not mention the interim report. After they had done that, we went back and asked them to review Reid’s translation from the report.

      All three of their translations were different from one another’s and different from Reid’s. Yet, each agreed that Reid’s translation was one plausible way to translate the passage into English. Our translators looked at the Chinese characters that Reid had translated to read “Every time this has happened” and instead said they read them to mean “on such occasions” or “at every such an occasion.”

      Before one of the translators was told what Reid had written, she said she thought the word “occasions” referred to when lab workers make mistakes that lead to hazards — an interpretation that mirrored Reid’s. The two others said they thought “occasions” referred to something more routine: opening test tubes for experiments. The language in Chinese, all three agreed, was ambiguous and could be read either way.

      Some readers noted that the Nov. 12, 2019, passage actually appeared in August 2019 in a party publication. The existence of the earlier reference, they argued, proved that its repetition in November meant that it could not refer to a biosecurity emergency at that time.

      We took a close look at the August 2019 post and asked our translators and the experts we consulted to do so as well. While the posts were very similar, the version uploaded on the WIV website in November 2019 was slightly different. It included additional language after the sentence that compared opening test tubes of viruses in the lab to opening Pandora’s box. The translator we commissioned who had the most experience rendered the additional language as follows: “These viruses are untraceable both coming and going, and although there are various protective measures, it is still necessary for lab workers to operate very carefully in order to avoid creating dangers through mishandling.” The translator was puzzled by the August post because without the language added in November, “it sounds as if they are leading the charge to open Pandora’s box,” she said. “If I were reading it, I’d be scratching my head.” That additional sentence, she said, “means that they go to the front lines to show everybody to be careful and not to cause errors that would be dangerous.”

      One of the experts we consulted before and after publication, a former senior U.S. intelligence official, said the language added in November 2019 gave the post a defensive posture and was consistent with Reid’s analysis that party members were responding to some type of incident. The Chinese idiom that Reid translated as “come without a shadow and leave without a trace,” he said, “is a nice phrase to describe something that sneaked up on you and there was no way to defend against it. They’re basically saying to whoever this is being delivered to: ‘We didn’t see it coming. We did the best that we could to deal with the problem.’”

      More on the Corrections and Added Context

      There are two sentences in the story that have been corrected.

      We reported that a Chinese military vaccinologist who had in the past collaborated with the WIV, Zhou Yusen, was the first to apply for a patent for a vaccine against COVID-19. The interim report stated that Zhou “was the first to patent a COVID-19 vaccine on February 24, 2020.” In fact, other researchers around the world sought patents before Zhou’s Feb. 24, 2020, filing.

      However, it was the timing and nature of Zhou’s patent application and subsequent research papers that raised questions for interim report researchers.

      In our review of early SARS-CoV-2 vaccine patent filings, the U.S. patent applications we found that predated Zhou’s were provisional applications, a number of which forecast experiments they planned to do in the future. Many of these applications were for vaccine candidates proposing to use a technology like mRNA. Such applications could be filed with the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence in hand and minimal experiment data.

      By contrast, Zhou filed a full patent application for a different kind of vaccine that required more upfront work before its submission. Our story says, “In his patent application and in subsequently published papers, Zhou documented a robust research and development process that included both adapting the virus to wild-type mice and infecting genetically modified ones with humanized lungs.” We have updated the story to make clear why Zhou’s work stood out to the interim report researchers.

      In our article, we quoted two independent experts and one adviser to the interim report about when they thought Zhou’s research was likely to have begun. After reviewing the patent and the papers, two said that they thought Zhou would have had to have started this work no later than November 2019. Jesse Bloom, a virologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, said he believed Zhou’s timetable was feasible since his team had substantial expertise and ongoing work developing similar SARS-related coronavirus vaccines, but only if “everything went right.”

      We have also corrected the sentence stating that Gabriel Gras was the last French expert at the WIV. We have learned that at least one other French scientist came to the WIV after Gras left.

      Elsewhere, we’ve clarified language. Our story said that party officials at the WIV’s top biosafety lab “repeatedly lamented” the problem of “the three ‘nos’: no equipment and technology standards, no design and construction teams, and no experience operating or maintaining [a lab of this caliber].” We found two references to this concept in party branch dispatches on the WIV website in 2019. These Chinese Communist Party dispatches, we reported, “are often couched in a narrative of heroism — a focus on problems overcome and challenges met, against daunting odds.” We have updated the story to clarify that authors of those posts referred to the “three ‘nos’” as a recounting of problems from early in the lab’s construction that they said had been overcome, rather than a reference to ongoing struggles.

      However, one of the experts on party communications we consulted saw the inclusion of the “three ‘nos’” in WIV dispatches as a telling sign that these serious problems from the beginning were “part of the DNA of this lab.”

      On Whether the Lab Leak Is a Question Worthy of Exploration

      Our story and the interim report pointed to a pair of oft-cited scientific analyses of COVID-19’s origins, one of which concludes that the pandemic was likely the result of multiple zoonotic events in which “two distinct viral lineages” of SARS-CoV-2 that had been circulating among animals at a Wuhan market infected people there.

      Michael Worobey, an author on both papers, undoubtedly speaks for many when he says that natural spillover is “the only plausible scenario for the origin of the pandemic.” We repeatedly heard the perspective that the scientific case on the origins of COVID-19 is closed and that exploring the possibility that the coronavirus could have leaked from a Chinese laboratory is something no news organization or government official should take seriously.

      We believe the opposite, that it remains an essential avenue for exploration to prevent future pandemics. And as interviews with other scientists before and after publication have made clear, the question is far from resolved. In their view, there is not enough evidence to establish how the virus first reached the now-infamous Wuhan market or to assert that zoonotic spillover is the sole possible explanation for the pandemic’s origin.

      COVID-19 Origins: Investigating a “Complex and Grave Situation” Inside a Wuhan Lab

      Bloom, the virologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, is among those scientists. “I’ve never seen anything as controversial as this in my field,” he said. “The amount of toxicity is out of control. Each side feels uniquely wronged. To me, it remains an open question.”

      The story noted that the interim report also left this question open: “The authors of the interim report do not claim to have definitively solved the mystery of COVID-19’s origin.” And the story also said the interim report is “no likelier” than studies of a zoonotic origin to “close the book on the origins debate, nor does it attempt to.”

      Bloom believes the findings of the interim report and the story reinforce a need to continue to explore all possible causes of the pandemic. At the same time, he recognizes that the reactions to these investigations underscore the difficulty of having a dispassionate conversation about these questions. “Right now, this whole topic is so politically fraught, it’s hard for people to give objective assessments,” he said. “We may need an independent commission to get to the bottom of this.”

      Stephen Engelberg

      Stephen Engelberg is ProPublica’s editor-in-chief and served as founding managing editor from 2008–2012.

      87

      Share this:

      • Twitter
      • Facebook
      Like Loading...
      14k
      SHARES
      ShareTweet
      • Tags Truth about COVID

      Categories
      Medicine

      No Virginia, not a rinky dink hospital. Cleveland Clinic again rated number 1 heart hospital.

      • Post author By MC
      • Post date November 13, 2022
      • No Comments on No Virginia, not a rinky dink hospital. Cleveland Clinic again rated number 1 heart hospital.
      www.cleveland.com Photo

      Hits: 33

      As some of you may know, several years ago I had a aortic aneurysm and a leaky valve. My open heart surgery was done at the Cleveland Clinic. Several of the lurkers made fun  and wished for my demise. One even called the Cleveland Clinic a rinky dink hospital.

      For the 28th consecutive year, Cleveland Clinic is America’s No. 1 hospital for cardiology and heart surgery in U.S. News & World Report’s 2022-23 Best Hospitals rankings, while earning a Top 5 overall ranking for the 24th year in a row.

      Cleveland Clinic’s main campus hospital ranks No. 4 in the nation, placed nationally in 13 specialties – including nine in the Top 10 and six in the Top 5 – and is the No. 1-ranked hospital in Ohio

      Well 5 years later I’m still going strong. Sorry that they were disappointed  that the surgery went well.

      107

      Share this:

      • Twitter
      • Facebook
      Like Loading...
      15k
      SHARES
      ShareTweet
      • Tags Cleveland Clinic, Heart, Number 1

      Categories
      Daily Hits. Links from other news sources. Medicine MSM Reprints from others.

      News from MSM Medical page. This writer disagrees with some of the links.

      • Post author By MC
      • Post date November 2, 2022
      • No Comments on News from MSM Medical page. This writer disagrees with some of the links.
      Medpagetoday Photo

      Hits: 8

      I thought I would put this out there. Some good and some does have me scratching my head. These are the views of those who at times try to stop the rest of the story. The article is from MedPage Today.

      Note that some links may require subscriptions.

      The Supreme Court let a ruling stand which allows the Transportation Security Administration to mandate mask-wearing on planes, trains and other forms of transportation. (The Hill)

      CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, MD, MPH, developed COVID rebound after being treated with Paxlovid, the agency announced.

      The FDA said that clinicians providing abortion pills to patients before they are pregnant — a prescribing method known as advance provision — are acting without the agency’s authorization, and that they could be putting patients at risk. (Politico)

      A judge in North Dakota stopped the state’s abortion ban from going into effect, saying it’s likely the law will face constitutional challenges once it’s implemented. (AP)

      Missouri’s health department is investigating whether a hospital violated federal law by denying a woman an abortion in a medical emergency. (ABC News)

      Ob/gyn residency programs in states that restrict abortion face a difficult choice when it comes to educating their trainees on abortion: risk prosecution or losing their accreditation. (New York Times)

      Pfizer said its respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine for pregnant women was 81.8% effective in preventing severe infection in infants, stating it will submit an application for approval to the FDA by the end of this year.

      Scientists are exploring therapies that target human proteins for the treatment of COVID-19. (Washington Post)

      Shanghai Disneyland closed indefinitely yesterday due to the COVID pandemic. (NPR)

      A record number of cholera outbreaks has been reported across the globe, forcing health agencies to ration their limited supply of vaccines. (New York Times)

      The FDA warned of a shortage of tracheostomy tubes, urging providers to reuse tubes or use appropriate alternatives.

      Abiomed announced that the FDA granted pre-market approval to its Impella RP Flex with SmartAssist, an implanted device to treat acute heart failure for up to 2 weeks.

      The CDC issued a Health Alert Network advisory emphasizing the importance of cleaning and monitoring dental waterlines, following multiple nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) infections in children who were exposed to water with high levels of bacteria at pediatric dental clinics.

      Voters in Arkansas, Maryland, Missouri, North Dakota, and South Dakota — four of which are among the most conservative states in the nation — will decide whether or not to legalize recreational marijuana in the upcoming election. (NPR)

      A man accused of intentionally setting fire to a Tennessee Planned Parenthood clinic died in August, officials said. (AP)

      Experts explain why the latest wellness trend — parasite cleanses — is “modern snake oil.” (Washington Post)

      An Iowa egg farm home to 1.1 million chickens has been infected with bird flu. (ABC News)

      • Amanda D’Ambrosio is a reporter on MedPage Today’s enterprise & investigative team. She covers obstetrics-gynecology and other clinical news, and writes features about the U.S. healthcare system.

       

       

       

      77

      Share this:

      • Twitter
      • Facebook
      Like Loading...
      13k
      SHARES
      ShareTweet

      Categories
      Back Door Power Grab Biden Pandemic Corruption COVID Medicine Politics

      Winning. Judge Tosses NYC Vaccine Mandate – Reinstates all Fired City Workers, Orders Back pay

      • Post author By Phoenix
      • Post date October 26, 2022
      • No Comments on Winning. Judge Tosses NYC Vaccine Mandate – Reinstates all Fired City Workers, Orders Back pay

      Hits: 16

      New York – In Richmond County Supreme Court, Judge Ralph Porzio, has ruled that the vaccine mandates issued by the New York City Health Commissioner are unconstitutional and violate the separation of powers.

      The ruling permits city employees to return to work effective immediately and orders back pay.

      According to attorney Chad Laveglia, the judge ruled “the commissioner’s order mandating private and public employees get vaccinated was arbitrary and capricious.”

      “Being vaccinated does not prevent an individual from contracting or transmitting Covid-19,” the judge stated.

      NY State Supreme Court reinstates all fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay, says the state violated rights, acted arbitrary & capricious, notes:“Being vaccinated does not prevent an individual from contracting or transmitting Covid-19.”https://t.co/nvOsWfa56S pic.twitter.com/WhH4wje2bQ

      — Marina Medvin 🇺🇸 (@MarinaMedvin) October 25, 2022

      [Due to Rumble and the FV player we use here not speaking to each other, we cannot supply the accompanying video, but you can see it here: Judge strikes down nyc vaccine mandate for city workers ]

      While Laveglia was representing members of the Dept. of Sanitation in New York (DSNY), this ruling will impact the FDNY, NYPD, Dept. of Corrections and all other city employees who were shut down and forced to resign for refusing to cave in to an experimental emergency use vaccine.  The Gateway Pundit has previously reported on closures of firehouses in New York City that couldn’t remain open due to personnel shortages.  The Gateway Pundit also reported on a mass exodus of NYPD officers; although this was not exclusively related to the vaccine, it does pose a serious problem when the department’s numbers were already impacted greatly by the forced resignations earlier on.

      The vaccination mandate for City employees was not just about safety and public health; it was about compliance.

      The vaccination mandate for City employees was not just about safety and public health; it was about compliance.

      The defendants, of course, filed a Notice of Appeal.  In New York, there are 62 courts, one for each county, representing the Supreme Court.  Despite the name, the Supreme Court in New York is not the highest court.  That position reigns with the New York Court of Appeals.  It appears as though there is still the possibility of one last battle for the DSNY employees and Mr. Laveglia.

      The City of New York is represented by the New York City Law Department.  This means that the tax-payers of New York City are funding the fight to take away their own rights to work despite their personal decisions not to take an experimental vaccine that has numerous documented health implications in comparison to all other vaccines since the VAERS system began tracking adverse events.

      The tax-payer funded New York City Law Department writes in their appeal:

      “Did Supreme Court err in granting the petition, granting declaratory relief, and denying respondents’ cross-motion to dismiss, where, among other things, the petition is time-barred and the underlying employee vaccination requirements are entirely lawful and rational, as multiple courts have held”

      In the decision from the Richmond Supreme Court, Judge Porizio writes:

      “An administrative agency usurps the authority of the legislative branch when it promulgates a rule that the legislature did not delegate it the authority to make in the first
      instance“

      As you read the following, specifically the bold print, remember that the New York City Law Department is expending tax payer dollars to appeal this decision while costing the DSNY employees exorbitant legal fees to fight the appeal.  New York is no longer under a state of emergency, Joe Biden declared the pandemic over, and CDC guidelines for vaxxed vs unvaxxed are the same.

      “The punishment is the process.”

      Judge Porizio continues in his Conclusion:

      “It is clear that the Health Commissioner has the authority to issue public health mandates. No one is refuting that authority.

      However, the Health Commissioner cannot create a new condition of employment for City employees. The Health Commissioner cannot prohibit an employee from reporting to work. The Health Commissioner cannot terminate employees. The Mayor cannot exempt certain employees from these orders. Executive Order No. 62 renders all of these vaccine mandates arbitrary and capricious. Being vaccinated does not prevent an individual from contracting or transmitting Covid19.

      As of the day of this Decision, CDC guidelines regarding quarantine and isolation are the same for vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.  The Petitioners should not have been terminated for choosing not to protect themselves. We have learned through the course of the pandemic that the vaccine against Covid-19 is not absolute. Breakthrough cases occur, even for those who have been vaccinated and boosted. President Joseph Biden has said that the pandemic is over.  The State of New York ended the Covid-19 state of emergency over a month ago. 

      As this Court stated in its decision in the Rivicci matter, this is not a commentary on the efficacy of vaccination, but about how we are treating our first responders, the ones who worked day-to-day through the height of the pandemic.  They worked without protective gear. They were infected with Covid-19, creating natural immunity. They continued working full duty while their exemption requests were pending. They were terminated and are willing to come back to work for the City that cast them aside.

      The vaccination mandate for City employees was not just about safety and public health; it was about compliance. If it was about safety and public health, unvaccinated workers would have been placed on leave the moment the order was issued. If it was about safety and public health, the Health Commissioner would have issued city-wide mandates for vaccination for all residents. In a City with a nearly 80% vaccination rate, we shouldn’t be penalizing the people who showed up to work, at great risk to themselves and their families, while we were locked down.

       

      89

      Share this:

      • Twitter
      • Facebook
      Like Loading...
      15k
      SHARES
      ShareTweet

      Categories
      Biden Pandemic COVID Links from other news sources. Medicine Reprints from others. Stupid things people say or do.

      The Vaccine Spreaders of Misinformation: Bill Gates, Fauci & Company Deserve to Be Laughed At

      • Post author By MC
      • Post date October 24, 2022
      • No Comments on The Vaccine Spreaders of Misinformation: Bill Gates, Fauci & Company Deserve to Be Laughed At
      Lies supposedly educated folks tell. Image Credit: The Free Thought Project

      Hits: 22

       

      The way to prevent the next pandemic is to stop listening to these dingbats.

      The Vigilant Fox
      17 hr ago

      In light of Pfizer’s stunning admission — never testing for transmission for they “had to really move at the speed of science,” let’s take a trip down memory lane on how the “experts” got it all wrong.

      Dr. Fauci

      May 17, 2021

      When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected.

      Oh, Tony. How many times have you been infected with COVID, and how many boosters did you take? We can feel safe that nothing you say is true.

      Joe Biden

      July 21, 2021

      You’re okay. You’re not gonna — you’re not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations.

      From the guy who always seems to be lost. No surprise he got it wrong here.

      CDC Director Rochelle Walensky

      March 29, 2021

      Our data from the CDC today suggests, you know, that vaccinated people do not carry the virus — don’t get sick. And that it’s not just in the clinical trials but it’s also in real-world data.

      This one is extra funny because Rochelle just came down with COVID (10/22/22) after her fifth shot! And what data? The data that she’s been withholding from us this whole time?

      Rachel Maddow

      March 29, 2021

      If you get vaccinated, that vaccine will basically prevent you from getting sick with COVID. It will prevent you from having to go to the hospital with COVID symptoms. It will prevent you from dying from COVID. Great. Good for you.

      Not good for you — because Rachel struck out, 0 for 3! All these claims are untrue.

      What this means is that we can get there with vaccines. Instead of the virus being able to hop from person to person to person, potentially mutating and becoming more virulent and drug-resistant along the way — now, we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus STOPS with every vaccinated person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus; the virus does not infect them; the virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people.

      This is probably the most long-winded stretch of continuous falsehoods in TV history. Who gave a political pundit so much authority to spread medical misinformation?! Irresponsible, MSNBC! And where were the fact-checkers on this one?

      Bill Gates

      January 28, 2021

      Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves but reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal.

      Ah, Bill Gates, a guy with literal manboobs and no medical degree pretending to be a professional in public health. And what’s up with him always tucking his hands in his armpits? He must do it when he lies. And his hands are up in his armpits all the time.

      Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla

      Early to Mid 2021

      We have a lot of indicators right now that are telling us that there is a protection against transmission of the disease.

      Did any of those indicators include tests? It turns out — nope!

      May 4, 2021

      There is no variant that we can identify that escapes the protection of our vaccine.

      Why did the media give this guy so much airtime? He’s the CEO of Pfizer — of course, he’s going to only speak well about his product! And no surprise he got it wrong, too.

      Let’s give our so-called experts a few rounds of tomatoes and pies in the face.

      Image Credit: The Free Thought Project

      Because they’re still out there giving terrible public health advice. So, if you ever want some REAL information to stay healthy, listen to them, do the opposite, and you’ll probably be fine.

      This piece was inspired by this image by The Free Thought Project.

      Thanks for reading

      113

      Share this:

      • Twitter
      • Facebook
      Like Loading...
      15.1k
      SHARES
      ShareTweet
      • Tags Fauci & Company Deserve to Be Laughed At, Lies, The Vaccine Spreaders of Misinformation: Bill Gates

      Posts navigation

      ← Newer Posts1 2 3 Older Posts →

      Recent Posts

      • UN Pushing Govts to ‘Fully Comply’ with LGBT Agenda, Target Religious Whose Faith Contradict It February 6, 2023
      • Trump, top national security officials refute claim that Chinese spy balloons transited US under last admin. Let’s hope Hunter wasn’t sitting on the board of the company that made the balloon. February 5, 2023
      • Newly Republican State Supreme Court To Rehear Voter ID, Redistricting Cases – Could Result In 4 New GOP Congressmen Next Election. February 5, 2023
      • Thanks Joe Biden, three oil companies made over 125 Billion last year. And it wasn’t from increased production. February 5, 2023
      • She was a true American sports hero. Played to win, not protest February 4, 2023

      Categories

      • Abortion rights?
      • Back Door Power Grab
      • Biden Pandemic
      • Child Abuse
      • Corruption
      • COVID
      • Crime
      • Daily Hits.
      • Drugs
      • Economy
      • Education
      • Elections
      • Emotional abuse
      • Faked news
      • Food
      • History
      • How funny is this?
      • How sick is this?
      • Human Traficking
      • Immigration
      • Judical Watch
      • Just my own thoughts
      • Leftist Virtue(!)
      • Life
      • Links from other news sources.
      • Media Woke
      • Medicine
      • MSM
      • Music
      • Opinion
      • Parler
      • Politics
      • Polls
      • Privacy
      • Progressive Racism
      • Project Veritas
      • Public Service Announcement
      • Racism
      • Racism.
      • Reprints from others.
      • Satire
      • Science
      • Sexual Abuse
      • Social Venues-Twitter
      • Social Venues-Twitter
      • Sports
      • Sports-Entertainment
      • Stupid things people say or do.
      • The Border
      • The Courts
      • The Law
      • Un documented.
      • Uncategorized
      • Work Place

      • 0
      • 49

      adds

      Archives

      • February 2023 (11)
      • January 2023 (57)
      • December 2022 (53)
      • November 2022 (51)
      • October 2022 (47)
      • September 2022 (48)
      • August 2022 (39)
      • July 2022 (43)
      • June 2022 (30)
      • May 2022 (42)
      • April 2022 (28)
      • March 2022 (42)
      • February 2022 (41)
      • January 2022 (7)
      • December 2021 (20)
      • November 2021 (22)
      • October 2021 (43)
      • September 2021 (23)
      • August 2021 (21)
      • July 2021 (20)
      • June 2021 (16)
      • May 2021 (30)
      • April 2021 (33)
      • March 2021 (46)
      • February 2021 (45)
      • January 2021 (42)
      • December 2020 (47)
      • November 2020 (27)
      • October 2020 (29)
      • September 2020 (18)
      • August 2020 (5)

      Categories

      • Abortion rights?
      • Back Door Power Grab
      • Biden Pandemic
      • Child Abuse
      • Corruption
      • COVID
      • Crime
      • Daily Hits.
      • Drugs
      • Economy
      • Education
      • Elections
      • Emotional abuse
      • Faked news
      • Food
      • History
      • How funny is this?
      • How sick is this?
      • Human Traficking
      • Immigration
      • Judical Watch
      • Just my own thoughts
      • Leftist Virtue(!)
      • Life
      • Links from other news sources.
      • Media Woke
      • Medicine
      • MSM
      • Music
      • Opinion
      • Parler
      • Politics
      • Polls
      • Privacy
      • Progressive Racism
      • Project Veritas
      • Public Service Announcement
      • Racism
      • Racism.
      • Reprints from others.
      • Satire
      • Science
      • Sexual Abuse
      • Social Venues-Twitter
      • Social Venues-Twitter
      • Sports
      • Sports-Entertainment
      • Stupid things people say or do.
      • The Border
      • The Courts
      • The Law
      • Un documented.
      • Uncategorized
      • Work Place

      meta

      adds

      add text.

      google.com, pub-1153197987467784, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

      CC

      Creative Commons License
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

      Warning

      Any threats especially to law enforcement or politicians will get you banned

      share

      © 2023 Looking at today's world

      Powered by WordPress

      To the top ↑ Up ↑
      Any threat especially against law enforcement or politicians will get you banned.
      %d bloggers like this:
        Verified by MonsterInsights