No Virginia, you can’t eliminate all Republican districts in California, Illinois, and Colorado.
I saw on one of those obscure websites where a loon posted that California, Illinois, and Colorado could eliminate all Republican districts. Here’s what leftist AI has to say about that.
Short answer: No — even after the Louisiana ruling, California, Illinois, and Colorado cannot legally eliminate all Republican districts. The ruling restricts race‑based mapmaking, not partisan gerrymandering, and each of these states faces structural, legal, and geographic constraints that prevent a total wipeout of GOP representation.
The Supreme Court’s 6–3 decision in Louisiana v. Callais struck down Louisiana’s map because it used race as the predominant factor in drawing a second majority‑Black district. The ruling weakens Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, making it harder to justify maps drawn with explicit racial considerations.
Important:
This means blue states can still draw partisan‑leaning maps — but they cannot use race as the primary tool to do so.
No. Even with Prop 50 giving Democrats power to redraw maps mid‑decade, analysts show California can at most eliminate 3–5 Republican seats, not all seven.
Even Rep. Terri Sewell’s political call to “eliminate all GOP districts” in CA was aspirational rhetoric, not something legally or mathematically feasible.
No. Illinois already has one of the most aggressively pro‑Democratic maps in the country.
No — and even less so than CA or IL. Colorado uses an independent redistricting commission, not legislative control.
Across all three states, three constraints prevent a full partisan wipeout:
Even though partisan gerrymandering is allowed, maps still must satisfy:
Republican voters are not evenly spread; some areas are too strongly Republican to be cracked without creating bizarre, indefensible districts.
The Louisiana ruling makes race‑based gerrymanders harder, but it does NOT empower blue states to eliminate all Republican districts. Political rhetoric aside, the math, geography, and legal frameworks make such a total partisan wipeout impossible in California, Illinois, or Colorado.
Blue AG’s and voter fraud.
For some reason we have these Blue AG’s swearing up and down about how fair their elections are, but they refuse to allow the federal government access to federal election results. Latest is in Michigan. Why?
On April 17, Michigan’s lawless Attorney General, Dana Nessel, responded to Asst. AG Dhillon’s demand, in a letter, in which she arrogantly claimed that the state would not comply with the DOJ’s request, which, according to Harmeet Dhillon, they are entitled to gain access to under several federal statutes, including a specific transparency statute from the 1960 Civil Rights Act.
You make the call. Did Spanberger lie to voters during the campaign about how she would not pursue this gerrymandered redistricting?
What she said when she was running.
In 2019, Spanberger publicly criticized gerrymandering and positioned herself as a supporter of fair, non‑partisan redistricting.
According to reporting, she said that:
Gerrymandering is “detrimental to our democracy.”
Opposing it should be a “bipartisan priority.”
She supported Virginia’s independent redistricting commission, which voters approved in 2020.
These comments aligned her with a reform‑oriented, anti‑gerrymandering position.
And today.
Supporting a Democratic‑led redistricting amendment
Backing a plan that critics say would create a 10–1 Democratic congressional map
Arguing that the change is a temporary.
What’s he afraid of? Reopen the Fang Fang love affair.
The Democrat is currently running for governor of California, and Breitbart News reported in January that his “dealings with Chinese communists may be coming back to haunt him” during the campaign.
The Hill on Saturday cited reports from the New York Times and the Washington Post, the news coming after Breitbart News in 2021 confirmed the U.S. Intelligence Community had a classified report that included “intricate and intimate” details about the relationship between Swalwell and the spy.
Yes, a Republican could be California’s next governor. And a recall would begin immediately.
My friends we have seen how the left cries to the courts or goes the recall way when they lose. Now in California they haven’t lost yet but are already talking recall in the governor’s race. A columnist for the Los Angeles Times is promising that if a Republican wins the race for governor in California, that an effort to recall that person may begin immediately.
Not to worry. The left will rig the elections, and a Republican won’t be in first or second.
You can’t read, write, or speak English but you can drive a truck and vote?
Don’t you just love this country? Drive a semi, vote in all elections, maybe be President of the United States. All for the person who can’t read, write, or speak English. Wait that’s illegal in the United States. But, in some states all of that openly happens. OK so the illegals can’t be President. Lookout if a Democrat wins the WH, and both houses of Congress in 2028. Next President in 2032?
What countries went Conservative or are leaning Conservative. Since 2020.
The Biden administration has been a God send worldwide. We have seen a power surge to the right. Argentina – Javier Milei (conservative libertarian) won the presidency in 2023.
Netherlands – Geert Wilders’ conservative party won the 2023 election.
Portugal, Indonesia, others – Conservative parties performed strongly in 2024 elections. And elsewhere? Other examples.
Poland, Hungary, El Salvador, Italy, Austria, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Paraguay, etc. Thanks Joe Biden.
Elections & Responsibilities.
Walter Mow.
I am issuing a challenge to young adults age 14 – 22. You about to enter adulthood where you will have responsibilities that you and you alone can address.
Voting is not only a duty, but a responsibility that you are to take seriously if you want to see your nation maintain its standing in the world. If you fail to vote after you have become eligible to vote, you have no tight to complain about the direction of the country.
The issues that are to be voted on and the candidates for public office are your responsibility to know both the issues and the position of the candidates. Yes, we have seen time and again that a candidate who during the campaign espouse certain things only to refute the statements after being elected. That is something that no one can be sure of without doing hard and often deep diligence into the candidates past statements and actions, and even then, we can be lead astray.
The ballot box is our voice against these kinds of nefarious acts by voting them out of office in the ensuing election season. Labeling them TRAITORS and LIARS to their constituents is justified if such actions can be proven, otherwise you can be sued for LIABLE. Therefor we all must take care to see to it that we are correct when we call these cretins out.
My biggest concern is whether or not the young have the courage to accept such a challenge. Politics isn’t for momma’s boys and girls who are more concerned with their hairdo than their country. Do you have the courage??? Or are you willing to throw up your hands in supplication???
How the undocumented effect state and national elections.
Below is a study that looked at how the past two elections would have been changed if true.
10% to 27% of non-citizen adults in the U.S. are now illegally registered to vote. Also, I used AI for answers.
Seven states would have had less Democrats in the House and Senate.
Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.
And if this were applied to state house and senate races?
Between 12 and 18 states
would likely have had at least one state House or Senate race where the numbers would have made a difference. A closer look.
Between 6 and 10 states
would likely have had multiple races affected.
Between 3 and 5 states
would likely have had chamber control potentially influenced, because some chambers flip on margins of 1–3 seats.
