Categories
California. Leftist Virtue(!) Links from other news sources. Opinion Politics Reprints from others. Taxes

Tax everyone.

Tax everyone.

Article by Josh Koehn

Lawmakers and local officials want to unleash an avalanche of new taxes on Californians in 2026, slugging everyone from big and small business owners to everyday consumers.

The new tax push comes just as gasoline tax increases yet again this summer — with drivers receiving little notification beyond a sneaky mention on an obscure government webpage.

In Sacramento and San Francisco, lawmakers and unions are crafting new taxes to go after landlords with vacant properties and businesses, big and small.

The most controversial proposal is the billionaire’s tax, which has already seen an estimated trillion dollars in wealth fleeing the Golden State.

In Los Angeles, county supervisors seized on Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Legislature’s frequent waiving of a 2% cap on local sales tax to push another half-cent sales tax increase, meaning Angelenos face paying an eyewatering 10.25% every time they arrive at the cash register.

Meanwhile, California’s absurd gas taxes — the highest of any state in America — will be jacked up again in July because lawmakers and former Gov. Jerry Brown signed off on SB 1 in 2017, which locks in excise increases on gasoline and diesel based on the annual rate of inflation.

“The overall picture is one of high taxation and taxes that don’t exist in other states,” Jared Walczak, a senior fellow at the Tax Foundation.

A study by the Tax Foundation found the California ranked only behind Washington D.C. and New York for the highest combined state and local per capita tax at $10,319 per year.

But for California’s lefty lawmakers and the advocates, that’s not enough. They want to be number one.

And a sampling of new taxes on the menu includes the AB 1790, or the “water’s-edge” election, a corporate tax change putting more pressure on companies employing millions of Californians.

The proposal means a portion of any income they earn, anywhere in the world, would be subjected to Californian law.

Other proposals include creating new employer penalties tied to workforce metrics, such as how many employees rely on government health coverage, or pay-ratio triggers based on the gap between a CEO and rank-and-file workers.

Dave Kline, spokesperson for the California Taxpayers Association, said a wider variety of taxes are being introduced, particularly at the state level

“It’s not just proposals to increase the sales tax or income tax on everyone – it’s very targeted these days,” he said.

Dem lawmakers up and down the state have cast many of these new tax proposals as a response to cuts in state funding via President Trump and Republicans’ “Big Beautiful Bill.”

California is facing a budget deficit between $3 billion and $18 billion depending on whether one trusts Gov. Gavin Newsom’s math or his nonpartisan budget analysts.

But what is not pointed out, however, is California’s total budget has increased by $150 billion — to $348.9 billion — since Newsom took office in 2019.

“It would be tough for taxpayers to look around and think all of the services have improved to the same extent as spending has gone up,” Kline said.

State legislators introduced proposals for more than $16 billion in new taxes and fees, according to the California Taxpayer Foundation.

The question an increasing number of Californians seem to be asking about taxes is: what are we getting in return?

“Any skepticism voters have in regard to state and local government is justified,” said Jon Coupal, president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.

In Los Angeles, the county Board of Supervisors’ vote to increase the sales tax by another half-cent comes less than a year after the enactment of Measure A, which doubled the previous homelessness sales tax to a permanent half-cent.

Supervisors said they are pushing the sales tax effort to raise $1 billion a year to make up for funding gaps in healthcare, similar to an argument being used by the state’s SEIU-UHW organizers running the proposed billionaires’ tax.

The latter proposal’s passage would be unprecedented in American history – and it may not even be legal in trying to pin individuals’ California residency to the start of this year, Walczak said.

Kathryn Barger, the lone dissenting vote on the LA county board, noted her reluctance to pick up where state legislators have left off, as Los Angeles has suffered a series of scandals over mismanaged funds related to a sales tax increase for homelessness services.

“We are not, as a whole, credible when it comes to promises made, promises broken,” Barger told the Los Angeles Times.

But sales taxes and property taxes are only part of the equation. Some of the most significant increases barely register with the public.

“The tax burden affects California’s economy, and some of these new proposals could drive out more capital investment, jobs and economic opportunity,” Walczak said.

“When people move, they often don’t say they moved for taxes but for jobs. And what California has done with its tax policies is drive those jobs elsewhere.”

Share
Categories
Commentary Fake News Leftist Virtue(!) Lies Links from other news sources. Opinion Politics Reprints from others. Stupidity

What happens when you don’t do any research? You attack on air personalities.

What happens when you don’t do any research? You attack on air personalities. Tenet Media was a U.S.-based media company founded in January 2022 by political commentator Lauren Chen and her husband Liam Donovan.

Tenet Media shut down on September 5, 2024, after two Russian Nationals were charged. None of the on-air personalities knew where the money was coming from and none were charged. See below.

What the DOJ alleged
The Justice Department accused Russian state‑media employees of:

secretly funding Tenet Media

directing content strategy

using the company as a covert influence operation

But the indictment did not accuse the U.S. influencers of knowingly participating. Who was not charged?
No American influencers or Tenet Media on‑air personalities were charged.
The DOJ framed them as:
“Unwitting” participants
People who did not know the money came from Russian state media.

Why weren’t the Americans charged?
Based on the sources:
The indictment alleges the Russians concealed the funding.
The influencers were paid as if it were a normal media contract.
DOJ did not accuse them of knowingly participating in a foreign influence operation.

Bottom line
Yes — charges were filed.

Only the Russian operatives were indicted.

No Tenet Media hosts or U.S. influencers were charged.

Share
Categories
Fake News Links from other news sources. Opinion Politics Reprints from others.

Dershowitz to Newsmax: Maria Farmer’s Purported Vindication Is False.

Dershowitz to Newsmax: Maria Farmer’s Purported Vindication Is False.

Below is a article that first appeared on Newsmax.

By Jim Thomas

Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz forcefully rejected claims tied to Epstein accuser Maria Farmer during a Newsmax interview on Tuesday while urging full transparency as the Justice Department faces scrutiny over its redacted release of Epstein records.

Appearing on “The Record With Greta Van Susteren,” Dershowitz disputed assertions that Farmer was vindicated by newly released federal documents and challenged the credibility of allegations connected to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein.

Responding to a claim that Farmer had been vindicated, Dershowitz said, “You said that the woman in 1996 was vindicated; she wasn’t vindicated. “This is Maria Farmer – she is a complete and total nutcase,” he continued.

“She believes the Holocaust didn’t occur. She thinks Jews control the world. She thinks that all Jews are pedophiles,” Dershowitz said.

“Of course, the FBI didn’t believe her in 1996. Nobody would believe her. She’s a complete nutcase except to CNN. CNN has her on every day.”

Dershowitz said Farmer claimed to have seen him at Epstein’s residence before he had ever met Epstein, disputing the account and questioning why such claims would be credited.

“Understand, Maria Farmer said she saw me once in Jeffrey Epstein’s house before I ever met Jeffrey Epstein. I mean, she sees ghosts. This is a completely non-credible nutcase that nobody should believe. Just because it’s in the files doesn’t make it true,” he said.

He added that the FBI would have evaluated such allegations at the time and rejected them, citing Farmer’s past statements.

“I’m sure the FBI looked into it and said, ‘Oh my God, this woman making a claim — what she said about Jews, what she said about people — of course we’re not going to believe her,'” Dershowitz said, characterizing the situation as “pure McCarthyism.”

Pressed on why the public cannot see unredacted files, Dershowitz argued that partial disclosures distort the record.

“A lot of these women who call themselves survivors, who call themselves victims — a lot of them were perpetrators, perjurers, liars. Lawyers got rich over this,” he said, while also stating that Epstein committed serious crimes and that “there are real victims.”

Dershowitz cited examples of allegations he said were fabricated, referencing claims later retracted, and warned that selective transparency harms legitimate victims.

“Partial transparency — that’s what Joseph McCarthy did,” he said, arguing that accusers and the accused should be subject to the same scrutiny.

He said he has studied the case for years and renewed the calls for prosecutions where warranted.

“Look, I know more about this case, probably, than any person around. I’ve been investigating this case since I became Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer in 2006 or something like that,” Dershowitz said.

“Many of these women — 20-year-olds, 21-year-olds, 23-year-olds — were making $250 a shot for bringing 14-year-olds to Jeffrey Epstein for sex. Let’s prosecute them. They’re within the statute of limitations.”

The remarks came after the Justice Department recently released redacted Epstein-related files.

According to CNN, the release was described as a breakthrough by Farmer and her sister Annie, who say Maria filed one of the earliest complaints against Epstein in the 1990s.

Share
Categories
America's Heartland Commentary History Links from other news sources. Reprints from others.

Blast from the past. Student Designed US Flag & Received a B- For It.

Blast from the past. Student Designed US Flag & Received a B- For It.

In 1958, a 17-year-old Bob Heft set out to complete an open-ended assignment for his American History class in Lancaster, Ohio. “Like a science fair” project, he would later explain, students could make whatever they wanted.

To hear him speak about it, it’s clear Heft has told this tale countless times.

Inspired by the Betsy Ross story — legend has it, the seamstress was called upon by George Washington himself to design the flag during the Revolutionary War — Heft set about ambitiously making his own. At the time, there were only 48 states in the union. But, working off a hunch that Alaska and Hawaii would soon join, Heft added an extra couple stars. The teacher was unimpressed.

“He said, ‘Why you got too many stars? You don’t even know how many states we have,’” Heft recalled. (Harsh, teach.)

He earned a B- for his efforts — which involved dissecting a 48-star flag his parents had received as a wedding gift and sewing it back together himself with the knowledge he’d gleaned by watching his mother. The whole process had taken over 12 hours, he later told The Houston Chronicle. He’d even asked his grandmother to help, but she’d refused, upset that he’d ruined a perfectly good flag.

“Now, a B-minus ain’t that bad of a grade,” Heft admitted. “However, a friend of mine, Jim, he’d picked up five leaves off the ground — he’s taping these leaves down to the notebook and labeling them elm, hickory, maple — and the teacher gave him the grade of an A. I was really — I was upset.”

An A for leaves taped to paper, and a B- for a hand-sewn emblem of our great nation. The teacher — who, at this point, may have simply had it out for young Bob Heft — said he’d bump up the grade if the U.S. government officially adopted his design. The sheer indignity of it all gave Heft the momentum he needed.

In August 1959, 21 letters and 18 phone calls later — not to his parents’ great pleasure upon seeing their phone bill — Heft got a call from then President Dwight D. Eisenhower, inviting Heft to see his creation hoisted up the flagpole. But Heft was working and didn’t know if his boss would let him take a quick vacation. So, to his boss’ horror, he put the president on hold. (It all worked out, of course.)

On July 4, 1960, the 50-star flag was officially raised over Fort McHenry in Maryland, with Heft standing proudly by. True to his word, Heft’s teacher gave him that hard-sought A.

Bob Heft later become a teacher himself. He kept a brisk schedule of motivational speaking engagements — over 200 in his last year — and died in December 2009. At the time of his death, his school project was safely tucked away in storage.

Credits: huffingtonpost.com

Share
Categories
Commentary Reprints from others. Uncategorized World Stage

A blast from the past. The Raid on Taranto

A blast from the past. The Raid on Taranto

An article Walter did back in 2020.

At approximately 20:40 (8:40 PM) local time, November 11, 1940, the first flight of 12 Fairey Swordfish lifted off the deck of HMS Illustrious (followed by a second flight some 90 minutes later) in the final action of a multi tasked operation dubbed, “MB8”.

The planning for MB8 began in the aftermath of the Munich Agreement September 30, 1938. Appeasement to Hitler’s Germany would lead many in the Admiralty to begin the long range planning for British Naval Supremacy in the Mediterranean.

The planning for MB8 came to the fore as Italy declared war in June 1940 and followed up with an invasion of Egypt in September. The conflict for control of the Mediterranean had begun.
With an Italian Army in Libya, a British Army in Egypt, convoys accompanied by war ships crossing and re-crossing one another’s course, factor in Italy’s alliance with Germany and conflict was considered a real possibility. Commander in Chief of the Mediterranean Fleet, Admiral Sir Arthur Cunningham was responsible for the orderly and safe operation of the convoys that supplied the British Army.
The Italian Navy followed a “Fleet in being” theory that sortied against the British convoys from their base at Taranto consisting of 5 operational battleships, 7 heavy Cruisers, 2 light cruisers and 8 destroyers. To that end Admiral Cunningham was responsible to see that Operation MB8 denigrate the effectiveness of the Italian Navy in interdicting supply convoys to the population of Malta and the British Army in Egypt.
The British were concerned should the Italian navy be successful, supply convoys to the British Army in Egypt be forced to round the African continent’s Cape of Good Hope and leave the badly needed British outpost of Malta with no reliable avenue of re-supply.

Planning sessions made the case for the Italian Navy’s “Regia Marina” based at Taranto to be the prime target. The planning sessions also made the case for an obsolete biplane to be the prime asset to perform the attack. Designed in 1930s as a dive and torpedo bomber with night capabilities made the Swordfish the operational choice.
The Italian navy kept tabs on British movements principally by aerial reconnaissance; this made collecting the necessary assets for the attack on Taranto without alerting the Italians of prime concern. Regular British aerial surveillance of the base at Taranto by British medium bombers (Martin XA-22, named the Maryland by the British) kept tabs on the Italian Navy.

In a seemingly discordant series of mixed convoys, “Operation MB8” began November 4, concluding November 11 with the full on attack (Operation Judgement) of the base at Taranto consisted of 5 convoy elements (Operation Coat, Convoy MW3, ME3, Convoy AN6, Operation Crack) that would allow the assets necessary for the raid to be assembled near the Greek Island of Cephalonia (located approx. 170 miles South-East of The base at Taranto) without unduly raising concerns of the Italian Navy.
“Operation Judgement” was originally scheduled for October 21st (Trafalgar Day) but delayed by a fire aboard Illustrious that destroyed two of the Swordfish. A second British aircraft carrier, HMS Eagle was to join Illustrious but a fuel system failure eliminated her participation. In order that Illustrious be able to launch the attack alone, she took aboard five Swordfish from HMS Eagle bringing the number of Swordfish available for the attack to 21.

Several incidents contributed to the British success; first the complexity of Operation MB8 confused the Italians into thinking that it consisted of supply convoys not an offensive. Secondly the Italians had placed a number of barrage balloons to protect against low-flying aircraft, but a wind storm on November 6th had reduced the number of balloons to 27. Lastly but of greater importance was the lack of proper anti-torpedo nets for fully one third of the capital ships in harbor.

The first wave of aircraft consisted of six Swordfish armed with torpedoes, two with a combination of bombs and flares and the remaining four armed with bombs made up the first wave. This was inadvertently split into two sections as 4 aircraft strayed from the group while flying through some scattered clouds.
Eight aircraft approached the harbor at 22:58, one dropped flares, joined by another plane, the two attacked and set fire to a series of oil tanks. Three aircraft led by Lt. Commander Williamson attacked the battleship “Conte di Cavour” with a torpedo that tore a huge hole just below her water line; Williamson’s craft was shot down by the ship’s anti-aircraft batteries. The two remaining aircraft, dodging barrage balloons unsuccessfully attacked the battleship “Andrea Doria”. Three planes attacking from a northerly direction launched torpedoes at the battleships Littoria (hitting it with two torpedoes) while missing the battleship Vittorio Veneto.
The bomber force, led by Marine Captain Patch, although having difficulty identifying targets successfully bombed and scored hits on two cruisers and straddled a group of four destroyers.

Nine Swordfish made up the second wave, but a ship board collision damaged two Swordfish forcing one to abort and the final Swordfish to launch some 20 minutes behind the rest of the flight.
Lt. Commander Hale and his flight approached from a northerly direction with torpedoes, bombs and flares. The battleship Littoria was attacked by planes dropping torpedoes again, one torpedo striking her. One of the flight, despite taking heavy anti-aircraft aimed its torpedo at the battleship Vittorio Veneto but missed. Another craft would torpedo the battleship Caio Duillo, leaving a huge hole in her hull and her forward magazines flooded. Lt. Bayly was shot down by anti-aircraft fire from the Italian heavy cruiser Gorizia after successfully attacking the battleship Littorio; the only craft downed in the second wave. The late launch by the last of the attacking Swordfish arrived some 15 minutes made a dive bomb attack on one of the Italian heavy cruisers but was unsuccessful.

Out of the 20 Swordfish that participated in the attack, only two airplanes were lost. Lt. Commander Williamson and his crewman were taken prisoner, Lt. Hale and his crewman would die in the crash of their craft. The rest of the attacking aircraft returned safely to the Illustrious, the final plane landing on her deck at 02:39, November 12, 1940.

British Admirals Cunningham and Lyster wanted to strike the base again the next night, but bad weather intervened.
With the loss of half its capital ships, the Italian navy moved its base of operations to Naples. Contrary to British hopes, five days after the raid, the Italians returned to actively sortie against British supply convoys but were constrained by the added steaming times to interdict the British convoys.

The damaged battleships would undergo substantial repairs. The Conte di Cavour was so severely damaged that she never returned to service. The Caio Duillo was run aground in order to save her and seven months later was returned to service. The Littorio required four months of repair before she too was returned to service.
A modified drop of the torpedoes allowed the British to successfully use torpedoes in the shallow waters of Taranto harbor. A drum with a roll of wire attached to the nose of the aircraft kept the torpedo from nose diving into the water, keeping the torpedo in a flat trajectory as it entered the water.

Lt. Commander Takeshi Naito of the Imperial Japanese Navy was flown to Taranto to investigate the successful attack; this inspection confirmed for the Japanese that they could successfully attack the American base at Pearl Harbor in spite of the harbor’s shallow depth.

This raid on Taranto confirmed for the British the aircraft carrier was of greater value than the battleship due to its ability to attack from ranges that even the big bore guns of the battleship could not reach.

Walt Mow 2020

Share
Categories
Commentary Drugs Headline News Links from other news sources. Medicade Reprints from others.

Admin Announces New Medicaid Drug-Pricing Program. Let’s see if this works.

Admin Announces New Medicaid Drug-Pricing Program. Let’s see if this works.

If the drug companies go along, this would be awesome. Let’s see.

The U.S. government on Thursday announced a new program aimed at lowering prescription drug costs for Medicaid patients by linking prices to those paid in other countries.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said the program, called the GENEROUS Model, will allow states to buy certain medications at prices similar to those in select other countries. The program is set to begin in 2026.

“Drug prices in the U.S. remain far too high,” said Abe Sutton, director of the CMS Innovation Center. The program aims to ensure Medicaid pays prices on par with other developed nations, he said.

This article first was reported by Newsmax.

Share
Categories
Back Door Power Grab Biden Biden Cartel Government Overreach Opinion Politics Reprints from others.

1,565 Clemency Actions in One Day — But Who Signed Them?

1,565 Clemency Actions in One Day — But Who Signed Them?

THE CONCERN
Was President Biden mentally competent when 39 pardons were issued on Dec 22, 2024? Reports suggest aides may have used the autopen — without his direct approval.

THE LAW
Only the President can grant pardons. Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution gives this power exclusively to the President. It cannot be delegated — not even to a Chief of Staff or Cabinet Secretary.

AUTOPEN ≠ INTENT
The autopen is legal only if the President gives contemporaneous, knowing approval. If that didn’t happen? Those pardons are constitutionally void.

THE SCALE
1,565 clemency actions in one day. That’s more than any President in modern history — and it happened during a period of reported cognitive decl

THE INVESTIGATION
The House Oversight Committee is probing:

Unauthorized autopen use

Lack of documentation

Concealment of Biden’s condition

WHY IT MATTERS
If aides issued pardons without Biden’s approval, it’s not just a scandal — It’s a constitutional cris

CALL TO ACTION
The world deserves answers. Demand a full review of every December 2024 pardon. The rule of law depends on it.

Share
Categories
Court Overreach Links from other news sources. Opinion Politics Reprints from others. The Courts

Trump Wins Again: 9th Circuit Says He Can Send National Guard to Portland.

Trump Wins Again: 9th Circuit Says He Can Send National Guard to Portland.

This article first appeared on Breitbart.

By Joel B. Pollak

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled Monday that President Donald Trump has the authority to deploy the National Guard to Portland, Oregon, reversing a decision by a district judge earlier this month.

It was the second time the Ninth Circuit — despite its reputation as a liberal bastion — overruled lower courts and allowed Trump to exercise his constitutional powers as commander-in-chief; the first case was California.

National Public Radio reported:

A divided federal appeals court for the 9th Circuit today overturned a temporary restraining order put in place by a federal judge in Portland – removing the legal impediment that was preventing the Trump Administration from sending National Guard troops to Portland.

“After considering the record at this preliminary stage, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3), which authorizes the federalization of the National Guard when ‘the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States,’” the majority wrote in their decision.

On Oct. 16, a federal appeals court upheld an earlier district court ruling in Illinois, temporarily blocking the president’s federalization and deployment of the National Guard deployment there. The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to intervene.

Much had been made, earlier, of the decision of U.S. District Court Judge Karin Immergut, a first-term Trump appointee, to block the deployment. Liberal commentators relished in her grandiose declaration: “This is a nation of constitutional law, not martial law.” The Ninth Circuit has since decided: it is, indeed, a nation of constitutional law, but not of rule by judges against law and order, or over the Constitution itself.

Share
Categories
Links from other news sources. Reprints from others.

“Spain Shouldn’t Apologize for Conquering America, But for Leaving It”: Alfonso Borrego Challenges the Black Legend.

“Spain Shouldn’t Apologize for Conquering America, But for Leaving It”: Alfonso Borrego Challenges the Black Legend.

In a powerful statement at Foro La Región in Spain, Alfonso Borrego—a direct descendant of the legendary Apache leader Geronimo—sparked international debate by declaring that “Spain should not apologize for conquering America, but for leaving it.”

Borrego’s comments aim to dismantle the long-standing Black Legend , a historical narrative that unfairly portrays Spain’s role in the Americas as purely oppressive and violent.

During his presentation, Borrego emphasized that the Spanish conquest was not an act of barbarism but a complex cultural process that brought with it education, religion, architecture, and a shared language that still unites the Hispanic world today.

He argued that the Black Legend—a term coined to describe anti-Spanish propaganda spread mainly by English and Dutch rivals—has distorted centuries of history to favor Anglo-American dominance .

Borrego also highlighted that many Indigenous nations collaborated with Spain during the conquest, and that the true tragedy came not from the arrival of the Spaniards, but from their eventual withdrawal.

Spain should not apologize for conquering America, but for having left. Alfonso Borrego, a descendant of the Apache Geronimo, challenges the black legend at the La Región Forum, highlighting Spain’s positive influence on education and health. Find out more here:
According to him, Spain’s exit left much of Latin America vulnerable to foreign exploitation and ideological manipulation, erasing centuries of shared cultural development.

His remarks come amid a growing global movement to reassess Spain’s colonial legacy, with scholars and historians urging a more balanced understanding of the era.

Rather than being defined by conquest alone, Borrego said, the Hispanic legacy should be seen as a civilizational bridge that connected Europe and the Americas in faith, language, and culture.

The indoctrination against Spain in the schools of the United States… By Alfonso Borrego, Hispanist, and descendant of the Apache leader Gerónimo.#ImperioEspañol, #Hispanic .
Alfonso Borrego’s words echo deeply in today’s polarized debates over history, identity, and colonialism. His message goes beyond politics—it’s a call to reclaim the truth about the Hispanic world’s shared roots.

Spain should not apologize for bringing civilization, education, and culture to the Americas. It should, however, reflect on why it allowed its legacy to be replaced by historical distortion and cultural amnesia.

Recognizing the truth about the Hispanic past is not about pride or guilt—it’s about understanding who we are and defending the legacy that unites millions across both sides of the Atlantic.

Share
Categories
Commentary COVID Links from other news sources. Medicine Reprints from others. Science Uncategorized

What the COVID Vaccine did to children.

What the COVID Vaccine did to children.


Henry Ford Health System, Detroit MI
Department of Public Health Sciences1
Division of Infectious Diseases2
Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit MI3

Corresponding Author:
Lois Lamerato, PhD
Senior Scientist
Public Health Sciences

Henry Ford Health System
1 Ford Place
Detroit, MI 48202

Financial Disclosure: This study had no external funding.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the short and long-term health outcomes, within a captured payer environment, of
children exposed to one or more vaccines to those unexposed.
Design: Birth cohort study
Setting: Integrated healthcare system in Michigan.
Participants: 18,468 children born between 2000 and 2016 enrolled in the health system insurance plan.
Main Outcome Measures: Development of a chronic health condition over time.

Results: A total of 18,468 consecutive subjects met eligibility criteria for the study, of which 1,957 had no
exposure to vaccination and 16,511 had received at least one vaccine during their enrollment in the plan
with various levels of exposure. After multivariate adjustment, Cox proportional hazards modeling
demonstrated that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an increased risk of
developing a chronic health condition (HR 2.53, CI 2.16-2.96). Of the chronic health conditions, exposure
to vaccination was independently associated with an increased risk of asthma (HR 4.25, CI 3.23-5.59),
autoimmune disease (HR 4.79, CI 1.36-16.94), atopic disease (HR 3.03, CI 2.01-4.57), eczema (HR 1.31,
CI 1.13-1.52), and neurodevelopmental disorder (HR 5.53, CI 2.91-10.51). There were no chronic health
conditions associated with an increased risk in the unexposed group. The overall probability of being free
of a chronic health condition at 10-years of follow up was 43% in the group exposed to vaccination and
83% in the unexposed group.

Conclusion: This study found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall
2.5-fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition, when compared to children
unexposed to vaccination. This association was primarily driven by asthma, atopic disease, eczema,
autoimmune disease and neurodevelopmental disorders. This suggests that in certain children, exposure
to vaccination may increase the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition, particularly for one of
these conditions.

What another study showed.

Dr. Thomas studied 3,324 children and found unvaccinated kids had fewer doctor visits and better health outcomes.

Here’s what his data showed:

• Fever – 9.1× higher in vaccinated

• Ear Pain – 3.4× higher

• Otitis Media (Ear Infections) – 2.9× higher

• Conjunctivitis – 2.4× higher

• Eye Disorders (Other) – 1.8× higher

• Asthma – 5.2× higher

• Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever) – 6.9× higher

• Sinusitis – 4.3× higher

• Breathing Issues – 2.9× higher

• Anemia – 5.5× higher

• Eczema – 4.5× higher

• Urticaria (Hives) – 2.1× higher

• Dermatitis – 1.4× higher

• Behavioral Issues – 4.1× higher

• Gastroenteritis – 4.7× higher

• Weight/Eating Disorders – 2.5× higher

• ADHD – 0 cases in the unvaccinated group

(Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition)

Share