Categories
Uncategorized

Repeal The NFA, Sign the petition.

Repeal The NFA, Sign the petition.

If you have ever considered that we have too much government, you wouldn’t be wrong.

Repeal The NFA, Sign the petition
https://secure.gunrights.org/1976_potato-p

Patriot,

My name is Zack Clark.

I’m the Director of Social Media for the National Association for Gun Rights.

And this is real:

I successfully registered a potato as a suppressor with the ATF.

That’s not a euphemism for a poorly-made suppressor… it’s a literal potato.

I filled out the paperwork.

I submitted fingerprints and photographs.

I underwent a federal background check.

And the ATF approved it.

Don’t believe me? Watch the video of me shooting with it.

That potato now exists in the federal government’s national firearms registry — right alongside real suppressors and real firearms.

Was this my way of trolling the ATF? Sure.

But the real reason I did it was to expose just how absurd, antiquated, and unconstitutional the National Firearms Act really is.

The NFA was passed in 1934 — nearly a century ago — using vague, fear-driven language that gives bureaucrats enormous power over everyday Americans.

It’s definition of a “suppressor” is so broad that a potato qualifies.

Let that sink in.

Under federal law, the government now claims authority over a vegetable — simply because it could theoretically reduce sound for a single use.

That’s not public safety. That’s unchecked government power.

And yes, while this whole thing is objectively hilarious… the process I went through isn’t funny at all. In fact, it’s an atrocity.

In our opinion, the NFA is the single biggest piece of gun control ever to become law in the United States of America.

Under the NFA, law-abiding Americans must ask permission before exercising a constitutional right.

They must pay a special tax.

They must wait months.

They must surrender privacy.

And they must accept permanent inclusion in a federal database.

All without ever committing a crime.

Make a mistake on the paperwork — and you’re facing felony charges.

When a law is so expansive that it ensnares a potato, the problem isn’t gun owners.

The problem is the law.

The NFA survives only because most Americans don’t realize how ridiculous it has become — or how dangerous it is to allow government power this broad to remain unchecked.

That’s why I did this.

And that’s why I’m speaking to you directly.

We at the National Association for Gun Rights are demanding Congress repeal the National Firearms Act — completely.

No more registries.

No more taxes on rights.

No more permission slips.

SIGN YOUR PETITION TO REPEAL THE NFA BELOW ⤵️

If the government can regulate a potato as a suppressor, it can regulate anything.

And if we don’t draw the line here, they’ll keep pushing it further.

I’m asking you to stand with me — and with NAGR — and send a clear message to Washington.

This law has gone on long enough.

For Freedom,

Zack Clark

Director of Social Media

National Association for Gun Rights

By participating, you agree to the terms & privacy policy (https://tandcs.us/ngr/) for recurring autodialed donation messages from NAGR to the phone number you provide. No consent required to buy. Msg&data rates may apply.
Your information is secure.

By accessing this form you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
https://secure.gunrights.org/1976_potato-p

Nuke the NFA!

Petition to my U.S. Senators

WHEREAS: The National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA), a law that has long infringed upon the rights guaranteed to the American people under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution; and

WHEREAS: The NFA was enacted with very little regard for the individual liberties and Constitutional protections of law-abiding citizens. Over time, this law has led to the undue regulation, taxation, and criminalization of items such as short-barreled rifles and shotguns, suppressors (commonly referred to as “silencers”), and other firearms that are in common use and pose no inherent threat to public safety when possessed by responsible individuals; and

WHEREAS: The law imposes onerous registration requirements, burdensome taxes, and long wait times, all of which serve to chill the exercise of a Constitutionally protected right. Furthermore, the NFA does little to deter criminal misuse of firearms, as those with unlawful intent are unlikely to follow its provisions in the first place. The burden instead falls squarely on the shoulders of law-abiding Americans; and

WHEREAS: The NFA is outdated, overly broad, and inconsistent with both the text and the intent of the Second Amendment. Its continued enforcement creates a framework of selective and arbitrary enforcement, disproportionately affecting certain communities and placing law-abiding gun owners at legal risk for mere technicalities; and

WHEREAS: We believe in the responsible exercise of Constitutional freedoms, and we believe that true public safety is achieved through the education and empowerment of citizens — not through laws that erode rights and criminalize non-violent conduct.

THEREFORE: We respectfully urge you abolish the NFA and FULLY deregulate firearm suppressors from anti-gun state and federal laws.

Dear Fellow Patriot,

The National Firearms Act (NFA) is a blatantly unconstitutional, outdated, and tyrannical piece of legislation that has no place in a free society.

For over 90 years, the NFA has stood as a monument to federal overreach and the slow erosion of individual liberty.

The NFA’s absurd restrictions on short-barreled rifles, shotguns, and suppressors are not only arbitrary, they are actively harmful.

They criminalize non-violent conduct and subject Americans to outrageous taxes, bureaucratic red tape, and the constant threat of felony charges for mere technicalities.

It’s time. The NFA has got to go.

For Freedom,

Dudley Brown
President
National Association for Gun Rights

Share
Categories
Uncategorized

So, what state sits at the bottom of Literacy? California of course.

So, what state sits at the bottom of Literacy? California of course.

Why is California so bad? The bottom line.

California’s literacy challenges are real, but they’re driven by scale, diversity, poverty, and migration patterns. And how does my state of Ohio compare?

California ranks lower (i.e., worse) in literacy/illiteracy metrics than Ohio.

Ohio performs close to the national average, while California is a clear outlier on the low end.

Share
Categories
Uncategorized

What happens when you don’t research. Local police arrested church demonstrators.

What happens when you don’t research. Local police arrested church demonstrators. Not ICE.

We all know that a church service was disrupted by ICE protestors. Even the loony tune mayor said that wasn’t the way to protest. So, what happened? Local police made arrests. Now yesterday Indictments were handed down. But I repeat. ICE did not make the arrests in the church.

This from the AP.
Local police involvement
According to the Associated Press.

Protesters disrupted the service at Cities Church. This “prompted a local police response.” Local officers entered the church to remove the protesters and restore order.

Share
Categories
Uncategorized

I swear that Virginia is trying to top California.

I swear that Virginia is trying to top California.

California for years has ranked as the king of stupidity. Now Virginia is after that crown. On Monday, Virginia’s Democrat-controlled Senate Courts of Justice Committee passed legislation containing a ban targeting semiautomatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns.

The Virginia Mercury reported that the legislation, SB749, passed by a vote of 9-5. The bill uses the phrase “assault firearm” to describe any semiautomatic centerfire rifle with a detachable magazine that has any of the following features: “(i) a folding, telescoping, or collapsible stock; (ii) a thumbhole stock or pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the rifle; (iii) a second handgrip or a protruding grip that can be held by the non-trigger hand; (iv) a grenade launcher; or (v) a threaded barrel capable of accepting (a) a muzzle brake, (b) a muzzle compensator, (c) a sound suppressor, or (d) a flash suppressor.”

Share
Categories
Uncategorized

Take this seriously. If You Support Trump’s ‘Fascist’ Policies, You’ll Be Found Guilty of Treason When Leftists Take Over.

Take this seriously. If You Support Trump’s ‘Fascist’ Policies, You’ll Be Found Guilty of Treason When Leftists Take Over.

Sure, Molly is a has been actress who hasn’t had a hit movie in about 40-50 years, but her statement can ring true. Look what happened after J6. The FULL FORCE OF THE Federal GOVERNMENT was released.

Share
Categories
Uncategorized

Why are leftists distorting Amazon’s cuts announcement?

Why are leftists distorting Amazon’s cuts announcement?

Here’s what the obscure websites leave out because no research is done. Yes, Amazon said 16,000 employees would lose their jobs. The jobs they are presently in. In case you didn’t know Amazon owns Whole Foods. And many of those jobs will be at store closings. Stores that aren’t producing.

Amazon Go and Amazon Fresh locations are being closed. But They also announced that 500 Whole Foods stores are going to be opened. Average store has 182 employees. Multiply that times 500.

Nuff said.

Share
Categories
Uncategorized

What does 236 million buy in California? Shelter for 22 homeless.

What does 236 million buy in California? Shelter for 22 homeless.
I get it. 236 million doesn’t buy much these days. Especially in California. BUT THIS?

California Governor Gavin Newsom’s $236 million program to help those with severe mental illness who bounce between homelessness and jail has helped a measly 22 people since the its launch in 2022, a new report reveals.

Newsom’s CARE Court was billed as a “completely new paradigm” to get the mentally ill off the streets and into treatment, with up to 12,000 people expected to benefit, the Daily Mail reported.

But only 22 people have been sent to treatment over the past four years, after a state analysis found that up to 50,000 could be eligible for the program.

Share
Categories
Uncategorized

Short and sweet. Remember when Obama had balls?

Short and sweet. Remember when Obama had balls?

I’m sure you remember when Obama had a set of brass balls when it came to deporting the undocumented. Obama presided over the largest number of removals in U.S. history, driven heavily by Secure Communities and expanded ICE enforcement

“We’re going to keep focusing enforcement resources on actual threats to our security.” “Mass amnesty would be unfair”.

3.

Share
Categories
Uncategorized

Law 101. Jack Smith and the law.

Law 101. Jack Smith and the law.
Below is a summary of why Smith used a way to try and circumvent the law. Not really illegal, but not very ethical. When you read it you’ll see that he really had no case. This was all based on his claim of a conspiracy.

Jack Smith’s “Conspiracy” Theory — The Clean Breakdown

🟥 1. Smith charged Trump alone in a supposed multi‑person conspiracy
This is the core oddity.

In federal practice, a conspiracy charge almost always includes multiple defendants or at least one cooperating witness who has flipped. Smith did neither.

He listed six “co‑conspirators” but did not charge a single one of them. That is extremely unusual for a federal conspiracy case.

Former federal prosecutors across the spectrum — including Andrew Weissmann, who is no Trump ally — publicly noted how strange this structure is.

🟥 2. Standard conspiracy prosecutions start at the bottom, not the top
This is what the North Carolina congressman was referring to, and he was correct.

In normal DOJ practice:

You charge lower‑level actors first

You pressure them to flip

You build upward toward the alleged leader

You only indict the “boss” after securing cooperating witnesses

Smith did the opposite:

He charged only the alleged “boss”

He charged none of the alleged foot soldiers

He secured zero cooperating witnesses

He built no ladder to the top

That’s why many legal analysts said the indictment looked more like a narrative document than a traditional conspiracy case.

🟥 3. Why didn’t Smith charge the others? The four plausible explanations
These were the possibilities we walked through last time:

A. He didn’t have enough evidence to charge the others
If he lacked evidence against the six “co‑conspirators,” then the conspiracy theory collapses logically.
A conspiracy with only one person is not a conspiracy.

B. He wanted to avoid discovery battles
Charging multiple defendants triggers:

More motions

More discovery

More delays

More constitutional challenges

By charging only Trump, Smith kept the case streamlined and fast — which critics argue was the real goal.

C. He expected someone to flip, and nobody did
If Smith thought one of the six would cooperate and they refused, he would be stuck with a conspiracy case with no cooperating witnesses — a weak posture.

D. He wanted a political narrative, not a prosecutable conspiracy structure
This is the argument many conservative legal analysts make:
that the indictment was designed to tell a story, not to build a traditional conspiracy case.

🟥 4. The congressman’s point was legally accurate
He said:

“In a conspiracy, you start at the bottom to get to the top.”

That is exactly how federal conspiracy cases are normally built.

Smith’s structure inverted that model, which is why even neutral legal scholars called it “unorthodox,” “strategically odd,” and “procedurally thin.”

🟥 5. The bottom line
Smith’s indictment is unusual because:

It names six co‑conspirators

It charges none of them

It charges only the alleged leader

It has no cooperating witnesses

It skips the standard conspiracy‑building process

It reads more like a narrative than a traditional indictment

Whether someone supports or opposes Trump, the structure itself is objectively atypical in federal criminal practice.

Share
Categories
Uncategorized

A time and place for the EV. Just not now.

A time and place for the EV. Just not now.

General Motors has announced that production of the newly updated 2027 Chevrolet Bolt EV will end after approximately 18 months to make way for a gas-powered Buick crossover at its Kansas manufacturing facility.

The good news is that this Buick now made in China will be made here. Thank You President Trump.

Share