Categories
Commentary Corruption Democrat Elections Leftist Virtue(!) Links from other news sources. Reprints from others. The Law

If this stands. 15 Democrats Arrested For Election Fraud.

If this stands. 15 Democrats Arrested For Election Fraud.

In rural South Texas, prosecutors have brought forward one of the most significant vote-harvesting cases in recent state history.

On May 1, 2025, a Frio County grand jury indicted six people, including multiple public officials, on felony election-fraud charges. The indictments, secured after a two-year investigation led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office, expose an organized ballot-harvesting operation that allegedly influenced multiple local races in a heavily Democrat region.

Among those charged were Frio County Judge Rochelle Camacho, who faces three counts of vote harvesting; former Frio County Elections Administrator Carlos Segura, charged with tampering with physical evidence; Pearsall City Council members Ramiro Trevino and Racheal Garza; Pearsall ISD Trustee Adriann Ramirez, who is Camacho’s sister; and Rosa Rodriguez, identified as an alleged ballot harvester.

State investigators say the scheme targeted elderly residents and those voting by mail, with ballots collected in violation of Texas election law. Under Texas’s 2021 election-integrity reforms, compensated ballot collection carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

The arrests did not occur in isolation. In August 2024, Paxton’s Criminal Investigations Division executed search warrants in Frio, Bexar, and Atascosa counties, seizing evidence connected to what the Attorney General’s office described as an “illegal ballot-harvesting ring.”

The warrants were the culmination of years of complaints from local residents who claimed political operatives were systematically collecting and manipulating mail-in ballots. Investigators believe the operation was linked to a political network that benefited multiple Democrat candidates in local races.

The investigation expanded in mid-2025. On June 30, 2025, a second grand jury returned indictments against nine additional individuals, bringing the total number of defendants to fifteen. Among the newly charged was former Texas House candidate Cecilia Castellano, a Democrat, as well as former Bexar County Democrat Party Chair Juan Manuel Medina.

Other defendants include current and former city officials, school board members, and county commissioners across Frio County. The charges range from vote harvesting to tampering with government records, all tied to the same alleged coordinated ballot-collection network.

Court filings reviewed in the case describe how vote harvesters allegedly approached voters, particularly the elderly, under the pretext of offering assistance, then took possession of ballots before they were mailed.

In some instances, investigators say, those involved exchanged cash or electronic payments via apps like Cash App to secure ballots or voter information. Under Texas law, offering or accepting compensation for ballot collection is a third-degree felony.

Despite the scale of the operation and the number of public officials implicated, national Democrats and prominent state-level Democrats have been almost entirely silent.

For years, Democrats have claimed that voter fraud in Texas is virtually nonexistent. Yet here, in a single rural county, a two-year probe has resulted in fifteen criminal indictments, including against a sitting county judge, multiple city council members, and school district officials.

Texas law treats chain-of-custody breaches, compensated ballot collection, and tampering with election records as serious offenses for a reason. Mail-in ballots are especially vulnerable to exploitation when voter identities, ballot custody, and submission procedures are not strictly protected.

The Frio County case demonstrates how easily those protections can be circumvented when officials themselves are involved in breaking the law.

Election integrity is not a partisan issue, but the refusal of Democrats to address this case underscores a broader double standard. When allegations involve Republicans, Democrats demand full investigations, resignations, and sweeping reforms. When the accused are Democrats—especially in regions critical to their electoral strategy—silence prevails.

This article originally appeared at The Gateway Pundit.

Share
Categories
Uncategorized

Yes Virginia, you’re pond scum. Progressives ridiculing the drowning victims.

Yes Virginia, you’re pond scum. Progressives ridiculing the drowning victims.

We have a natural disaster (not climate change) where we may see over a hundred deaths, and the left has no compassion or care. Only want to make up stories about putting the blame on President Trump.

Many on obscure websites also joined in on ridiculing the heroes and lying about the actual facts. A few actual comments below.

“The people in Texas voted for government services controlled by Donald Trump and Greg Abbott. That is exactly what they getting,” “Texas deserves every flood god has spoken and it hates Texas,” another said. “Cry harder. Texas deserves it,”

Share
Categories
Abortion rights? Child Abuse Crime Drugs Links from other news sources. Medicine The Law

Texas sues New York Doctor. Why this is important.

Texas sues New York Doctor. Why this is important.

This is a one of a kind case. A few weeks back this was covered by much of the MSM. Here’s what they left out or glossed over.

Texas is suing a New York doctor for allegedly sending abortion pills to a woman in the state, which resulted in the death of an unborn child and serious complications for the mother.

The complaint alleges that in May 2024, a 20-year-old woman became pregnant but did not tell the father of the unborn baby. She had a healthy pregnancy but ultimately decided she wanted an abortion, so she allegedly ordered abortion pills online through Carpenter, the complaint states.

On July 16, she asked the father of the baby to take her to the hospital for “hemorrhage and severe bleeding,” the complaint continues. While at the hospital, the father of the child was notified that the woman had been nine weeks pregnant before ultimately losing the child, the complaint states.

Share
Categories
Biden Biden Cartel Commentary Crime Links from other news sources. The Courts The Law Un documented.

Supreme Court for now tells Texas to do the job the feds refuse to do. Arrest the undocumented.

Supreme Court for now tells Texas to do the job the feds refuse to do. Arrest the undocumented. Looks as if the Democrats will have to figure out another way to get the undocumented to vote.

Supreme Court lifts stay on Texas law that gives police broad powers to arrest migrants at border.
A 6-3 Supreme Court decision on Tuesday lifted a stay on a Texas law that gives police broad powers to arrest migrants suspected of crossing the border illegally while a legal battle over immigration authority plays out.

The law allows police in counties bordering Mexico to make arrests if they see someone crossing illegally.  It could also be enforced elsewhere in Texas if someone is arrested on suspicion of another violation and a fingerprint taken during jail booking links them to a suspected re-entry violation. It likely would not come into play during a routine traffic stop, he said.

Share
Categories
Elections

Opinion. Why the Supreme Court should hear the Texas Case.

Why the Supreme court should hear the Texas Case. MSM and most if not all on the left feel this is a waste of time. As do some on the right and many Independents. Let me explain why it’s not.

Now we are looking at Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. All four states had laws passed by the legislature. In all four states either the governor or the Secretary of state under the pretense of you’re gonna die ( Covid-19 ) if you don’t do this my way. Totally ignoring what the law was. Here’s where this effects the other 46.

Say Ohio or any other state has existing laws passed by the state legislature already in place. A new Governor or Secretary of State comes into power and says I think the elections should be done my way. Uses some type of catastrophic event as an excuse to do it their way. If that’s allowed, why have Senators and House reps to make laws? Just let the Governor or Another office holder decide what the law should be.

What say you?

Share