O’Keefe Media Group on Monday released its first undercover video in its NIH Tapes series.
In OMG’s first video release, Raja Cholan, Chief of Health Data Standards Branch US National Library of Medicine, said the Covid health initiatives were completely made up.
“I probably shouldn’t be saying this out loud. They might have funded a lab in Wuhan, China and Pfizer and Moderna are getting a bunch of money from all of these vaccine mandates,” Raja Cholan said to the OMG undercover journalist.
“I don’t even know if these vaccines stop you from getting COVID. They don’t,” Raja Cholan said, adding, “We’re all going to learn [about the dangers of the Covid vaccine] when it’s too late.”
Raja Cholan said the ‘six feet of social distancing’ rule “wasn’t based on any real evidence that it did anything – it was completely made up.”
The NIH Chief told OMG that Trump’s victory is “worse for the NIH.”
“It would be better for a Democrat to be in office,” he said.
“We fly under the radar of really being scrutinized…I don’t think I have too much to worry about. That’s not recording, right?” he said to the undercover journalist.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) earlier this year finally admitted to funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the ground zero for the COVID-19 pandemic.
This admission directly contradicts previous statements made under oath by Dr. Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).
Fauci has consistently denied these allegations under oath.
In a 2021 Senate hearing, Fauci clashed with Senator Rand Paul over Fauci’s involvement in funding the Wuhan lab’s gain-of-function research that led to COVID-19.
Fauci and others at the NIH received huge kickbacks from Big Pharma from Covid vaccines.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s nominee for Health and Human Services Secretary, recently left Dr. Phil stunned by the amount of kickbacks Dr. Fauci and other high-level deputies at the National Institute for Health received from Moderna and other major pharmaceuticals.
President Trump put a call out to all. Whites, Blacks, Latinos, Women, and Evangelicals. Evangelicals said not interested. We’ll sit on the sidelines and complain. See below few of the controversials.
I’m good with Dr. Janette Nesheiwat. The ones who still think Tony the Fauch was right worries me. Gateway Pundit and other Conservative sites seem to express doubts about Dr. Nesheiwat as Surgeon General.
Critics highlight Nesheiwat’s comments during the pandemic, where she strongly endorsed COVID-19 vaccines, masking protocols, and even praised social media censorship of vaccine skeptics.
Dr. Nesheiwat’s nomination puts Trump in a delicate position as he seeks to maintain the support of his base while promoting candidates he deems fit for office. Many conservatives are calling for someone who stood firm against “COVID tyranny” from the start.
I feel that she recanted and has made up for her past mistakes. To her credit, Dr. Nesheiwat has since adjusted her stance as more data became available. She criticized the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for its handling of the vaccine’s rollout and mandates, particularly its impact on children.
This study was publicly available, but publications such as The Lancet made repeated attempts to censor it. After far too long, it has finally been published.
Coincidentally, as the Trump administration and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. work on a transition plan, these types of stories have entered back into the zeitgeist.
Dr. Peter McCullough, a well-known COVID-19 vaccine combatant, has been active on X recently, speaking of the dangers of the vaccine and advocating for its removal.
Last week, The Gateway Pundit reported on another study -by two of the same authors – citing evidence that the current bird flu strain was leaked from laboratories performing gain of function research.
While there has long been evidence that the COVID-19 vaccine has been harmful because of the spike protein, this study made even broader claims.
“The findings of these researchers present an illustrative case of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche’s thesis that mass vaccination with nonsterilizing vaccines can result in the emergence of a new, more virulent viral strain.”
As the incoming Trump Administration looms over the swamp of Washington, the timing of such studies appears ominous for an unaccountable health bureaucracy.
The mounting evidence show a poorly constructed vaccine strategy for combating the pandemic. With this study having been previously censored by medical journals such as The Lancet, it begs the question as to why it has suddenly been accepted.
As one of the authors of the study, Nicolas Hulscher, observes, the CDC has remained silent.
The study’s findings are remarkable. The researchers studied autopsies from “…all published autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination through May 18th, 2023.”
Out of 240 deaths 73.9% can be attributed to the Covid-19 vaccination. The study breaks down the different adverse effects on the immune system and demonstrates why the “Spike Protein” can create unintended consequences as a mechanism for ‘immunological response.’
Curiously, the story of the deaths and the adverse events associated with the COVID-19 vaccine have stayed out of the mainstream pharmaceutical company-funded outlets.
As of today, according to VAERS, deaths and adverse events related to the Covid-19 Vaccine are sky high. These numbers far exceed not only the vaccines on the current schedule but all other vaccines combined in the history of the system.
Source: VAERS
It should be noted that these events can be reported by anyone and that VAERS should be a signal for safety. It does not, in any way, infer causation.
However, as more studies show threats to safety from the COVID-19 vaccine, the VAERS data can be a point of reference for future analysis.
The vaccines included in the study appear to cover the major platforms available in the marketplace. According to the study, Pfizer-BioNTech, Astrazeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Sinovac-CoronaVac, and Novavax are part of the analysis. This may or may not be relevant.
However, if further investigation continues to uncover similar problems with the vaccine across all platforms, the technology itself may begin to fall under further scrutiny.
As many previous analyses have indicated, the cardiovascular system has been found to be disproportionately affected by the vaccine. This analysis also indicates similar findings.
These studies are possible safety signals that should be flagged. At the very least, further analysis is needed.
See the graph of cases affected by organ system below:
Another observation regarded the three physicians who adjudicated the study. Out of the 240 deaths it was determined that 73.9% were caused by the vaccine.
The study also notes, “Among adjudicators, there was complete independent agreement (all three physicians) of COVID-19 vaccination contributing to death in 203 cases (62.5%).”
In the context of numbers, this should be recognized as Americans were bombarded with statistics during the pandemic.
Many of those statistics have since been proven to be inaccurate as counting in real-time can be difficult. However, for three physicians independently assert that 203 cases were directly caused by the vaccine, our government should be paying attention. These are real world medical practitioners observing patient events.
In summary, the study shows the following:
“…325 autopsy cases and 1 organ-restricted autopsy case (heart). The mean age of death was 70.4 years and there were 139 females (42.6%). Most received a Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine (41%), followed by Sinovac (37%), AstraZeneca (13%), Moderna (7%), Johnson & Johnson (1%), and Sinopharm (1%).”
Lastly, it’s important to point out a phrase oft excluded from mainstream attacks on studies such as this.
One key sentence in the conclusion of this study is the following: “Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.”
The frustration of whistleblowers such as Dr. Peter McCullough likely stem from the lack of inquiry by the regulatory bodies. Perhaps a new administration will be more likely to investigate such alarming signals further.
A federal court has denied a motion by anti-Trump pundit Andrew Weissmann to dismiss a defamation suit by former White House lawyer Stefan Passantino over false claims that he had coached a January 6 Committee witness to lie.
This case tells us that we need to get another Congressional hearing on those who testified on January 6. Also get the folks who the Democrats refused to call for what evidence they had.
In September, U.S. District Court Judge Loren AliKhan denied a motion from MSNBC legal analyst and attorney Andrew Weissmann to dismiss a complaint filed by Stefan Passantino, who represented former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson before she became the Jan. 6 Committee’s star witness.
…
“This is an insidious lie,” Passantino’s lawsuit reads. “Ms. Hutchinson even testified, under penalty of law: ‘I want to make this clear to you: Stefan [Passantino] never told me to lie. … He told me not to lie.”
Comcast officially announced on Wednesday it would spin off several NBCUniversal cable networks, including MSNBC, in a move that will dramatically shake up the landscape of legacy media as the liberal cable outlet will no longer be affiliated with NBC News.
MSNBC’s primetime lineup including the shows hosted by Joy Reid, Alex Wagner, Chris Hayes and Lawrence O’Donnell have taken hit in viewership since the election . Getty Images
Ratings have tanked and it seems as if Comcast will no longer continue to use their billions to keep this sinking ship.
The assets set to make up SpinCo generated roughly $7 billion in revenue over the last 12 months (But what was the profit margin, if any?) and Comcast hopes to complete the spinoff project in a year. The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that Comcast is guessing NBCUniversal’s other assets in broadcast TV, sports, movies and theme parks would have higher growth potential going forward.
The other day in a Congressional hearing this Black Progressive Supremacist (Congresswoman Crockett) was repeating the same old sad sack story about how she was oppressed. Why? Because Democrats brought Blacks here from Africa. Of course she doesn’t give examples of her own oppression.
The only folks oppressed are the weak White (and Black) men who refuse to stand up when Supremacists like Crockett carry on and tell lie after lie. She gets away with it because most Progressive White and Black go along with the lies. I guess they’re afraid of not getting the twice a year blow jobs.
Sanctuaries Kept 22K Criminal Illegals from ICE since 2021. For some reason the Sanctuary cities and states think they’ll get away with committing felonies.
Since January 2021, sanctuary jurisdictions have released more than 22,000 jailed criminal aliens that ICE was seeking to take into custody for removal, according to ICE records on declined detainers provided to Congress.
The number has grown each year, and represents 6 to 7 percent of ICE detainers issued in those years. Each declined detainer represents a deportable criminal alien who was released back into the community and given the opportunity to prey on more victims. The number reported by ICE include detainers declined by the law enforcement agency with custody of the alien, cases in which the local law enforcement agency provided insufficient notice to ICE to arrive before the alien’s release, and early releases of aliens despite a detainer.
For a complete list of sanctuaries across the United States, including those ICE has identified as non-cooperative on detainers, see the Center’s report.
Number of ICE Detainers Declined by Local Jurisdictions: Jan. 20, 2021 – July 15, 2024
Year
Number
2021*
2,512
2022
5,723
2023
7,934
2024*
5,871
Total
22,040
Note: * Denotes partial year. The 2021 figure covers January 20, 2021 – September 30, 2021. The 2024 figure covers October 1, 2023 – July 15, 2024. Source:ICE Records.
