Categories
America's Heartland Immigration Links from other news sources. The Courts

Right to Due Process. How we solve this.

Right to Due Process. How we solve this.
Yes, the illegals have most of the same Constitional rights as American citizens. But due process is a slippery slope. Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. does allow this. Under the expedited removal process, immigrants who have been in the country illegally for less than two years and are apprehended within 100 miles of the border can be deported almost immediately without going through a court hearing.

The exception is asylum seekers, who must be granted a hearing. But you have many on the left are demamnding a full-blown trial for the millions of undocumented. Here’s how you fix that. Give it to them, but they must wait in their home country for that trial. Problem solved.

Categories
America's Heartland Commentary Corruption Links from other news sources. Opinion Politics The Courts Trump

DC Court Bitch slaps local Federal Judge. Again.

DC Court Bitch slaps local Federal Judge. Again.

As you know, there is a low level of federal judges who are no more than traffic court judges. Well since January they have been making decisions and claiming that they are to be observed nation wide. Well Saturday a decision was made that may put a stop to this nationwide.

The DC Court of Appeals entered a stay of Lamberth’s injunction and suspended the first-instance decision, blocking the order that allowed them to return to work. The DC Court of Appeals entered a stay of Lamberth’s injunction and suspended the first-instance decision, blocking the order that allowed them to return to work. “The Court of Appeals decision is based on fundamental issue of “jurisdiction.”

Judge Lamberth made another fundamental error, as the Court of Appeals pointed out: that the district court lacked jurisdiction to restore grants because Congress gave that authority to the Court of Claims. The Court of Appeals also stated how the SCOTUS decision compels that result, yet Lamberth ignored the SCOTUS.

Categories
Abortion rights? Links from other news sources. The Courts

Federal Judge Cancels Biden-era EEOC Rule.

Federal Judge Cancels Biden-era EEOC Rule.
A federal judge in North Dakota ruled this week that Catholic employers do not need to provide abortion accommodations as outlined in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA).

EEOC went full-throttle, claiming the law covered “current pregnancy, past pregnancy, potential pregnancy, lactation, use of birth control, menstruation, infertility treatments, endometriosis, miscarriage, stillbirth, or having or choosing not to have an abortion.”

Categories
Back Door Power Grab Court Overreach Just my own thoughts Leftist Virtue(!) Opinion Politics The Courts

Short and sweet. Since when did low level yokels have more power than Supreme Court Justices?

Short and sweet. Since when did low level yokels have more power than Supreme Court Justices?

We’re seeing small time judges in local federal courts making decisions that go way outside of their district. What’s the left always say? Unelected officials. With powers like that, why would any judge want to go any higher if they make these calls from their echo chambers?

Categories
Commentary Court overreach. Links from other news sources. The Courts

Short term win. A court has temporarily blocked a ruling from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan.

Short term win. A court has temporarily blocked a ruling from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan.

The D.C. Court of Appeals halted the judge’s Tuesday ruling that ordered Citibank to release billions of dollars in green bank grants as part of Biden’s 2022 climate, tax and health care bill.

The appeals court ruled that the affirmative action judge decision did not meet the standard required for such an injunction.

The D.C. Court of Appeals said a separate order setting deadlines for parties’ responses or statements of support of the emergency motion for stay pending appeal will be issued at a later time.

Categories
Commentary Corruption Crime Links from other news sources. Media Woke Opinion Politics Reprints from others. The Courts Uncategorized

NBC defamation settlement with Georgia doctor finalized in court following MSNBC’s ‘uterus collector’ coverage.

NBC defamation settlement with Georgia doctor finalized in court following MSNBC’s ‘uterus collector’ coverage.

By Joseph A. Wulfsohn , Brian Flood Fox News.

NBCUniversal, the parent company of NBC News and MSNBC (the latter is currently being spun off as a separate company), settled the $30 million lawsuit filed by Georgia gynecologist Dr. Mahendra Amin. Amin who was the subject of a report claiming he performed unnecessary hysterectomies at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) center.

Both parties struck the settlement in February, but the lawsuit was officially dismissed Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. The terms of the settlement were not publicly disclosed.

“We are pleased that Dr. Amin is able to move on from his years-long litigation against NBCUniversal,” Amin’s attorneys, Stacey Evans and Scott Grubman, told Fox News Digital. “It is unfortunate that he had to sue to get confirmation of what was known all along—that he did not perform mass hysterectomies on women detained at Irwin County Detention Center. We are glad that the judge found those statements false as a matter of law because, in fact, Dr. Amin performed only two hysterectomies, both of which were medically necessary and consented to by the patients.”

“Dr. Amin is a dedicated physician who has dedicated his entire career to serving underserved communities. The recklessness of NBCUniversal to try to paint him as an evil doctor was disgusting and we are glad they finally settled the case,” they added.

Representatives from NBCUniversal and MSNBC did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

Rachel Maddow and Jacob Soboroff were expected to be called as witnesses in a jury trial previously scheduled for April 22, 2025, in Waycross, Georgia. (MSNBC/Screen grab)

Amin was the subject of an NBC News article in September 2020, which cited a whistleblower’s claim that he was performing unneeded hysterectomies while providing medical care to women detained at the Irwin County Detention Center.

MSNBC quickly followed with a series of on-air reports on “Deadline: White House,” “All In with Chris Hayes” and “The Rachel Maddow Show,” all running with the “uterus collector” label for Amin.
placeholder

Amin filed a lawsuit against parent company NBCUniversal, alleging he was falsely portrayed as “an abusive, unethical, and dishonest physician who treated and operated on immigrant women in an abusive fashion, without consent, and motivated by profit instead of quality healthcare.”

Judge Lisa Godbey Wood of the Southern District of Georgia previously ruled that a jury could reasonably find actual malice and the trial was set to begin April 22, in Waycross, Georgia. In light of the settlement agreement, the court canceled the scheduled trial.

“NBC investigated the whistleblower letter’s accusations; that investigation did not corroborate the accusations and even undermined some; NBC republished the letter’s accusations anyway,” Judge Wood wrote last year in a 108-page summary.
MSNBC is heading to trial in a $30 million “uterus collector

Amin believed “false and defamatory” statements published with actual malice that caused him significant damage were said six times on “Deadline: White House,” seven times on “All in with Chris Hayes” and 10 times on “The Rachel Maddow Show.”

“We are pleased that Dr. Amin is able to move on from his years-long litigation against NBCUniversal,” Amin’s attorneys, Stacey Evans and Scott Grubman, told Fox News Digital. “It is unfortunate that he had to sue to get confirmation of what was known all along—that he did not perform mass hysterectomies on women detained at Irwin County Detention Center. We are glad that the judge found those statements false as a matter of law because, in fact, Dr. Amin performed only two hysterectomies, both of which were medically necessary and consented to by the patients.”

“Dr. Amin is a dedicated physician who has dedicated his entire career to serving underserved communities. The recklessness of NBCUniversal to try to paint him as an evil doctor was disgusting and we are glad they finally settled the case,” they added.

Representatives from NBCUniversal and MSNBC did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

Rachel Maddow and Jacob Soboroff were expected to be called as witnesses in a jury trial previously scheduled for April 22, 2025, in Waycross, Georgia. (MSNBC/Screen grab)

Amin was the subject of an NBC News article in September 2020, which cited a whistleblower’s claim that he was performing unneeded hysterectomies while providing medical care to women detained at the Irwin County Detention Center.

MSNBC quickly followed with a series of on-air reports on “Deadline: White House,” “All In with Chris Hayes” and “The Rachel Maddow Show,” all running with the “uterus collector” label for Amin.
placeholder

Amin filed a lawsuit against parent company NBCUniversal, alleging he was falsely portrayed as “an abusive, unethical, and dishonest physician who treated and operated on immigrant women in an abusive fashion, without consent, and motivated by profit instead of quality healthcare.”

Judge Lisa Godbey Wood of the Southern District of Georgia previously ruled that a jury could reasonably find actual malice and the trial was set to begin April 22, in Waycross, Georgia. In light of the settlement agreement, the court canceled the scheduled trial.

“NBC investigated the whistleblower letter’s accusations; that investigation did not corroborate the accusations and even undermined some; NBC republished the letter’s accusations anyway,” Judge Wood wrote last year in a 108-page summary.

Amin believed “false and defamatory” statements published with actual malice that caused him significant damage were said six times on “Deadline: White House,” seven times on “All in with Chris Hayes” and 10 times on “The Rachel Maddow Show.”

Categories
Commentary Daily Hits. Links from other news sources. Politics The Courts

House passes good bill, but will die in the Senate. Restrict rogue judges.

House passes good bill, but will die in the Senate. Restrict rogue judges.

Of course the Senate will kill this bill because seven Democrats must go along with 53 Republicans. And being that the Democrats are using judge shopping, no way do they support this. Below is the result.

The House on Wednesday passed legislation that will prevent federal district court judges from issuing nationwide injunctions in a move that seeks to halt rulings that have hampered President Donald Trump’s agenda.

The legislation, the No Rogue Rulings Act, passed by a 219-213 vote, with only one Republican, Rep. Scott Turner of Ohio, joining the Democrat minority. Article III of the Constitution gives Congress authority over how lower federal courts operate.

Categories
Links from other news sources. The Courts Trump

President Trump (Winning) Wins at the Supreme Court.

President Trump (Winning) Wins at the Supreme Court.

Our beloved President had several nice wins at the Supreme Court. US Supreme Court on Monday vacated Judge Boasberg’s orders barring the Trump Administration’s removals of Venezuelan gang members under the Alien Enemies Act.

Also Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts indefinitely blocked a court order requiring the return of alleged MS-13 gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia by midnight tonight.

“The Supreme Court has upheld the Rule of Law in our Nation by allowing a President, whoever that may be, to be able to secure our Borders, and protect our families and our Country, itself. A GREAT DAY FOR JUSTICE IN AMERICA!” Trump said on Truth Social on Monday evening.

Categories
Elections Links from other news sources. The Courts

Democrat’s 700-Vote Victory Now in Jeopardy as 65,000 Voters Ordered to Prove Eligibility or Be Removed from Count.

Democrat’s 700-Vote Victory Now in Jeopardy as 65,000 Voters Ordered to Prove Eligibility or Be Removed from Count.
In a stunning decision filed Thursday, the North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled that approximately 65,000 ballots—cast by voters with incomplete registration information, missing photo identification, or submitted by individuals who have never lived in North Carolina—may be invalid under state and federal election law.

So now the election board has to contact all 65,000 folks to see if they can offer proof of their being able to prove who they are. They have 15 days to show proof.

Categories
Commentary DEI Links from other news sources. The Courts

Supreme Court Allows Trump Admin to Terminate Teaching Grants That Violate DEI (Progressives N Word) Policy.

Supreme Court Allows Trump Admin to Terminate Teaching Grants That Violate DEI (Progressives N Word) Policy.

NBC News reported:

The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Trump administration to terminate Education Department grants for teacher training that official deemed to violate their new policy opposing diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.

The decision blocks a Massachusetts-based judge’s ruling that said the administration had failed to follow the correct legal process in terminating the grants. About $65 million in grant payments are outstanding.

The decision is the first win for President Donald Trump at the Supreme Court in his second term.