Categories
Links from other news sources. The Courts

Winning. Not in Florida. Federal appeals court backs Florida school district that blocked transgender student from using boys bathroom

Federal appeals court backs Florida school district that blocked transgender student from using boys bathroom. Yes the appeals court ruled in favor of normalcy.

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals announced its 7-4 decision on Friday, ruling that the St. Johns CountyĀ School BoardĀ did not discriminate against transgender students based on sex, or violate federal civil rights law by requiring transgender students to use gender-neutral bathrooms or bathrooms matching their biological sex.

Judge Barbara Lagoa wrote in the majority opinion that the school board policy advances the important governmental objective of protecting studentsā€™ privacy in school bathrooms. She said the districtā€™s policy does not violate the law because itā€™s based onĀ biological sex, not gender identity.

Categories
Corruption Crime Elections Politics The Courts The Law

AZ Election Challenge Trial Reveals Bombshell Confession

On top of the malfunctioning machines and 4-hour-long waiting lines in MaricopaĀ  County, we now have this startling confession:

Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer testified Wednesday during GOP gubernatorial candidate Kari Lakeā€™s election challenge trial that the individual polling locations did not tally the total number of votes cast in the midterm elections, a violation of Arizona state law.

One of the allegations in Lakeā€™s lawsuit is that the total number of ballots the county reported in the election increased by nearly 25,000 from Nov. 9, the day after the contest, to Nov. 11.

That number is significant because it exceeds Katie Hobbsā€™ approximately 17,000-vote margin of victory over Lake.

“Theyā€™re not counted at the individual loading locations.”

ā€œOn Election Day it wouldā€™ve been easy for you to figure out how many ballots you received,ā€ Blehm said to Richer.

He responded, ā€œWell, we had to get them all in and it was quite a process throughout the night.ā€

Blehm interjected, ā€œYou can look at the forms and add the numbers. Correct?ā€

ā€œTheyā€™re not counted at the individual loading locations,ā€ Richer said. ā€œThey are counted when they get back to MCTEC and then they are recounted at Runbeck.ā€

ā€œDoes anybody know when those ballots leave the voting centers how many are in the bins?ā€ Blehm asked.

ā€œWhen the early ballots leave the voting centers, no, they are not counted at the voting centers,ā€ Richer answered.

Blehm followed up, ā€œNobody knows how many [ballots] are in the bins when they arrive at MCTEC. Correct?ā€
ā€œCorrect,ā€ Richer said.

The 2019 Arizona elections procedures manual, which cites state law, requires an audit at each voting location of the total number of ballots cast. The results must be recorded in an official ballot report.

The audit even requires accounting for the total amount of ballot stock paper on-site. The ballots cast must then be placed in sealed boxes.

According to former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett, Maricopa County should have known the total number of ballots on Election Day or certainly by the day after.

Each voting center, he explained, should have reported the exact number of voters and the number of early ballots that were dropped off.

The county must be able to answer the question, ā€œHow many ballots are we responsible for?ā€ Bennett said.

ā€œAnd it should match up with the number of people who signed in on the voting list or envelopes of the people that mailed theirs in or ā€¦ dropped them off at voting centers on Election Day.ā€

 

Categories
COVID Crime Drugs How sick is this? Medicine The Courts

A ā€˜Cover-Up of Evidence of Mass Murderā€™: The CDC Removing VAERS Records ?

ā€œItā€™s not an accident they would do this.ā€

By: The Vigilant FoxĀ  (a citizen journalist with 12 years of healthcare experience, focused on The Great Reset, world protests, and COVID-19.) December 21, 2022

Video available on Rumble

Something strange is going on with the VAERS system. Reports that were present three months ago are now inexplicably missing. And fewer than 4% of adverse events recorded in V-SafeĀ have made their way toĀ VAERS. This is the CDCā€™s database; Rochelle Walensky is in charge of it. And their failure to properly manageĀ VAERS is suppressing the already-alarming safety signal of the Covid-19 shots.

Fifty deaths pulled the swine flu vaxx off the market. Covid-19 vaxxes caused FIFTY deaths by January 2021!

Now, what isĀ VAERS? VAERS stands for VaccineĀ AdverseĀ EventĀ ReportingĀ System. As mentioned earlier, VAERS is a database put in place in 1990 under the supervision of the CDC. Reports of suspected vaccine adverse events take about half an hour to fill out, andĀ 86%Ā of the time, this is done by a doctor, nurse, paramedic, coroner, or healthcare professional in which he or she believes the adverse event is related to a vaccine reaction. And because of its lengthy report process as well as the lack of awareness of the existence of VAERS, there is a general consensus of a severeĀ underreporting factorĀ for this database.

To get a better idea of whatā€™s going on with the CDCā€™s handling of the VAERS system, Dr. Naomi Wolf spoke with Dr. Henry Ealy, an expert on the database.

Dr. Henry Ealy is the Founder & Executive Community Director for the Energetic Health Institute. He holds a Doctorate in naturopathic medicine and has been at the tip of the spear on the Grand Jury front ā€” taking action to bring forth a Grand Jury investigation of the CDC for allegations of criminal data fraud and willful misconduct.

ā€œYou mentioned that V-Safe should be added to VAERS, but only 4% of V-Safe [adverse events have been] added. Can you explain what that means to people and why it matters?ā€ askedĀ Dr. Wolf.

Dr. Ealy explained, ā€œVAERS is designed specifically for medical professionals and people alike to report, ā€˜Hey, I got hurt.ā€™ And when enough people have gotten hurt for officials to look at it and say, ā€˜Hey, this product isnā€™t safe; itā€™s got to come off the market.ā€™Ā V-SafeĀ was created (by the CDC) to also do something similar to that ā€” and to make that process a little bit easier. You donā€™t need as much information to record a report inĀ V-Safe.ā€

By streamlining the process, the CDC got inundated with adverse event reports from the Covid-19 shot. Out of theĀ 10,108,273 individual users, 800,000 had an adverse event ā€” or aboutĀ 1 in 13. And of those 800,000 V-Safe reports, only 30,492 have been logged into VAERS.

Dr. Ealy continues, ā€œIn V-safe, there have been over 800,000 reports of injury. And the deal was that in V-Safe, every single report of injury was supposed to also then subsequently have a VAERS report associated with it. So that means all 800,000 should be in VAERS. But unfortunately, or by design ā€” however you want to look at it ā€” only just over 30,000 of those 800,000 have been recorded in VAERS. So what that means is that fewer than 4% of the records in V-Safe have actually been reported in VAERS as they were supposed to be done.ā€

ā€œWhat a sneaky way to basically sweep almost 800,000 adverse events under the rug,ā€ remarked Dr. Wolf.

ā€œAdverse events, hospitalizations, permanent injuries, deaths ā€” compromises [the] dataset,ā€ replied Dr. Ealy.

ā€œThatā€™s so disgusting!ā€ exclaimed Dr. Wolf.

To add insult to injury, not only are the bulk of V-Safe reports not making their way to VAERS, but Dr. Ealy suspects that VAERS reports are being removed.

What were 45,388 reports three months ago has now inexplicably dropped down to 12,544.

Specifically, he notes that between September 2022 and December 2022, the CDC has removed at least 32,844 records of injury related to the following conditions: myocarditis, pericarditis, and heart inflammation. What were 45,388 reports three months ago has now inexplicably dropped down to 12,544.

Note the different totals between first chart and this one

Dr. Ealy stresses heā€™s ā€œtriple-checked this,ā€ and he stands by the allegation that they are removing or obfuscating records.

Dr. Jessica RoseĀ has also reported similar issues with VAERS.Ā She wrote on November 19, ā€œThe foreign data set was gutted this week in VAERS, and the cancer signal was halved. The myocarditis dose three response signal was lost, and 994 spontaneous abortions/stillbirths were dropped.ā€

So, from two credible sources, it is appears that the CDC is removing records.

ā€œItā€™s not an accident they would do this,ā€ attested Dr. Ealy. ā€œWith Dr. Ladapo and Governor DeSantis coming out with thatĀ study about myocarditis and pericarditis, theyā€™re trying to do everything they can to delete records to thwart what Governor DeSantis and (Florida) Surgeon General Dr. Ladipo are doing.ā€

ā€œIā€™m stunned,ā€ expressed Dr. Wolf. ā€œThis is as big as the Pentagon Papers, easily, if indeed the CDC deleted those records. Iā€™ve seen the screenshots; it looks pretty bad. And so, youā€™re saying that Dr. Ladapo and Governor DeSantis calling for a Grand Jury investigation could be the reason that theyā€™re deleting these, basically, evidence of their crimes? Because Ladapo and DeSantis will be investigating that data? Is that what youā€™re saying?ā€

ā€œRight,ā€ confirmed Dr. Ealy. ā€œWhen you read through the Grand Jury petition that Governor DeSantis signed and submitted to the Florida Supreme Court, they are putting a lot of what their argument based upon their findings with myocarditis. So myocarditis and pericarditis ā€” and thatā€™s not without good reason.ā€

Dr. Ealy continues, ā€œSo the issue is ā€” if youā€™re the CDC now ā€” and you know youā€™ve been complicit in data fraud from day one, what do you start doing? Well, youā€™ve been deleting records for the last couple of years. Why not delete the records specific for myocarditis and pericarditis to try to thwart their attempts and try to discredit their analysis of what theyā€™re doing? Thatā€™s what it looks like to me right now.ā€

ā€œThatā€™s many felonies!ā€ exclaimedĀ Dr. Wolf. ā€œThatā€™s not just a felony in terms of data handling ā€” thatā€™s a felony in terms of the criminal process, right? Isnā€™t that covering up evidence of a crime?

ā€œWell, yeah. It would definitely [be],ā€ repliedĀ Dr. Ealy.

The problem with VAERS as a federal system is yes, maybe if there is an erroneous record here or there, you should have the ability to delete it. But when you started seeing the CDC deleting hundreds of thousands of records and removing, in this case, over 32,000 records, or at least removing the search term. Thatā€™s my suspicion here ā€” that they didnā€™t delete the record. What they deleted was that word ā€” ā€˜myocarditisā€™ or ā€˜pericarditis or ā€˜heart inflammationā€™ in the actual report. And so, thatā€™s modification of official records. And when you do that, thatā€™s now criminal fraud ā€” again. And, of course, it throws off our ability to really understand whatā€™s going on with this because we rely on systems like this to give us information for making decisions.ā€

Dr. Wolf argues the CDCā€™s actions appear to be a ā€œcover-up of evidence of mass murder.ā€

And she pleas Governor DeSantis and Surgeon General Ladapo to get in touch with Dr. Ealyā€™s team ā€œbecause what you all have uncovered is absolutely stunning.ā€ ā€œAnd this latest, which youā€™ve presented, should be on the cover of every newspaper and every magazine and every news site in the world. This is huge if, indeed, theyā€™re concealing myocarditis outcomes.ā€

 

Categories
The Courts The Law

Winning. Finally Ohio and North Carolina can draw redistricting maps.

Come January North Carolina and Ohio will have favourable State Supreme Courts. Now they can ignore what was ruled by the present court. We will see a fair map for both Ohio and North Carolina.

The courts ruled against the maps that were drawn up by the elected Legislatures. But both maps were thrown out. But now with conservatives in power we wll see the Republican drawn maps in place.

Categories
Elections The Courts The Law

Why this must never happen again. Hopefully Moore Vs. Harper will fix this.

Why this must never happen again. Hopefully Moore Vs. Harper will fix this. Back in 2020 four states, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin in which the state executive branch (that is, the governor or other executive official) and or the judicial branch (that is, the state supreme court) changed the rules of the election apart from the authority of the state legislature.

The Democrats claim this is illegal gerrymandering. But the Republicans use the Constitution as their reason it’s not. Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution tells us who makes the rules regarding national elections: ā€œThe Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof. . . .ā€ In other words, the Constitution gives the authority over national elections to the legislatures in each of the states.

With the 2024 elections less than two years away, Giving a Secretary of State or Governor dictorial powers was not what the founding fathers wanted. That’s why the state legislatures were given that power. A group of men and women elected by the people for the people.

 

 

 

Categories
Links from other news sources. Politics Reprints from others. The Courts

Winning again. Judge denies justice department plea to hold Trump in contempt over records

A top federal judge denied a request from the justice department to holdĀ Donald Trumpā€™sĀ office in contempt of court for failing to fully comply with a subpoena demanding the return of all documents bearing classified markings, according to sources familiar with proceedings.

The chief US judge for the District of Columbia Beryl Howell told the department during a closed-door hearing on Friday to resolve the matter with the Trump legal team itself because a contempt ruling would not hold, the sources said.

The precise details about the hearing were not clear with the case under seal. But the judgeā€™s move amounts to a victory for Trump as he contends with a criminal investigation intoĀ unauthorized retention of national security informationĀ at his Mar-a-Lago resort and obstruction of justice.

Federal prosecutors had sought to force Trump to name a custodian of records and certify under oath that all documents with classified markings had been returned to the government ā€“ as demanded by the grand jury subpoena issued in May ā€“ or otherwise find Trumpā€™s office in contempt.

The contempt action is understood to be focused on Trumpā€™s political office because the subpoena sought the return of all documents and writings ā€œin the custody of Donald J Trump and / or the Office of Donald J Trumpā€ bearing classification markings.

In response to the subpoena, Trumpā€™s lawyer Evan Corcoran turned over a folder of documents to the justice department and asked another Trump lawyer Christina Bobb to sign a certification that she heavily caveatedĀ because she had not done the search, the Guardian previously reported.

The letter ultimately said that Bobb was making the attestation ā€œbased on the information provided to meā€ and ā€œto the best of my knowledgeā€, a fact that she emphasized to the department around the time that prosecutors collected the folder and the certification letter, a person familiar with the matter said.

But after the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago on 8 August and found 103 documents marked classified ā€“ leading prosecutors to believe the subpoena had not been complied with ā€“ the department sought Trumpā€™s lawyers to again certify that no further materials remained.

The Trump legal team has resisted designating a custodian of records and providing a sworn statement, despite repeated requests. That deeply frustrated prosecutors who told the legal team that if they did not provide a second attestation, they would seek judicial enforcement.

Part of the Trump legal teamā€™s reluctance comes because neither they nor any other member of the former presidentā€™s office have had custody of all documents marked classified and do not think they could comprehensively answer every question about them, the sources said.

In a statement, a Trump spokesman said the former president and his lawyers would ā€œcontinue to be transparent and cooperative even in the face of the highly weaponized and corrupt witch-hunt from the Department of ā€˜Justiceā€™.ā€

The closed-door court battle between the justice department and Trumpā€™s lawyers comes after it emerged that a search of a storage unit in Florida holding boxes of material belonging to Trump turned up two more documents marked classified, in addition to the 103 found at Mar-a-Lago by the FBI.

It was not clear whether the department initiated the contempt proceeding before or after the two additional documents were found, though the Trump legal team is understood to have turned over the two new documents as soon as they were discovered, the sources said.

Categories
Links from other news sources. The Courts

Supreme Court to Hear Case Challenging Joe Bidenā€™s ā€˜Sanctuary Countryā€™ Orders

In all of his craziness Last year ( February 2021 ) Biden declared that ICE agents could not arrest or deportĀ  most of the illegal aliens in the U.S. unless they are considered a threat to public safety, a threat to national security, or arrived sometime after November 2020.

Well the Supreme Court has agreed to hear oral argumentsĀ  where states are seeking to block President Joe Bidenā€™s so-called ā€œsanctuary countryā€ orders from being implemented.

In August 2021, Judge Drew Tipton of the Southern District of TexasĀ issued a nationwide preliminary injunction, halting the implementation of the orders, after Texas and Louisiana sued the Biden administration. That injunction was put on hold by a three-judge panel in September 2021 but the full 17-judge Fifth CircuitĀ vacated that decision.

Tuesday, SCOTUS will hear arguments from the Biden administration where they attest that the orders have only ā€œincidental effectsā€ on states in terms of needing more public resources to deal with a growing illegal alien population that is largely exempt from arrest and deportation.

ā€œā€¦ a State may not sue the federal government based on such indirect, derivative effects,ā€ the Biden administration is set to argue:

Federal policies routinely have incidental effects on Statesā€™ expenditures, revenues, and other activities. Yet such effects have never been viewed as judicially cognizable injuries. As the recent explosion in state suits vividly illustrates, respondentsā€™ contrary view would allow any State to sue the federal government about virtually any policyā€”sharply undermining Article IIIā€™s requirements and the separation of powers principles they serve. [Emphasis added]

Meanwhile, the states will argue that the orders are unlawful for three reasons:

First, it is contrary to law because sections 1226(c) and 1231(a)(2) mandate detention, as this Court has repeatedly stated. DHS identifies no INA provision that prevents this Court from reaching that conclusion. Second, the Final Memorandum is arbitrary and capricious because it failed to consider important aspects of the problemsĀ criminal aliens create, including recidivism and Statesā€™ reliance interests. Third, the Final Memorandum is procedurally invalid because it was not adopted through notice-and-comment procedures, which are required where agency action substantively changes a regulatory regime. [Emphasis added]

 

 

Categories
Crime How sick is this? Leftist Virtue(!) Reprints from others. The Courts

ANDY NGO REPORTS: Five more Antifa members in San Diego plead guilty to violent attacks during riot

Their plea deals were made more than a month after trans Antifa member Erich Louis “Nikki” Yach, 38, made a plea deal in September. Yach was the first of 11 defendants to plead guilty, and pleaded guilty to three violent felonies, including conspiracy to riot, and was sentenced to four years and eight months in prison earlier this month. Yach has a prior violent criminal record that was a factor in the sentencing.

Prior convicted felon Erich Louis “Nikki” Yach was recently sentenced to nearly five years in prison.

In the five new plea deals, court paperwork reveals that Antifa members Christian Martinez, Bryan Rivera, Joseph Austin Gaskins, Samuel Howard Ogden, and Alexander Akridge-Jacobs all agreed to two years probation, a fourth amendment search waiver that includes electronic devices, and to not associate with any co-defendant. Any actual custody time will be determined by the judge at a sentencing hearing in three months. Until then, all five defendants will remain at liberty on their own recognizance.

Christian Martinez, 24, pleaded guilty to felony conspiracy to riot with his Antifa co-defendants, plus felony assault on victim 7, likely to produce great bodily injury. He also admitted to the special allegation that he was armed with a weapon, a full can of Twisted Tea. The prosecutor told the grand jury that he threw this beverage can so hard at the victim that the can actually broke open. Martinezā€™s maximum possible sentence is four years and eight months in state prison, plus 3 years parole. Martinez was arrested in December 2021 at his familyā€™s home in Los Angeles, and police found Antifa symbols in his bedroom, according to testimony before a grand jury.

In June, a secret grand jury indicted 11 alleged Antifa members accused of being part of a network of violent cells in southern California that planned and carried out brutal assaults during a riot in Pacific Beach, Calif. on Jan. 9, 2021. Video recorded at the riot showed the mob in black bloc assaulting multiple victims with weapons. Trump supporters, minors, a photojournalist, and a man and his dog walking on the beach were all hurt during the attacks. Multiple weapons and firearms were seized from suspects during executed search warrants. This shocking conspiracy case involving Antifa has largely been ignored by establishment media which furthers the false claim that Antifa “doesnā€™t exist.”

Sentencing for the five who pleaded guilty is scheduled for March 1, 2023, at the central courthouse in downtown San Diego before Honorable judge Daniel Goldstein.

The five remaining defendants out of 11 have pleaded not guilty to all charges. Faraz Martin Talab has a trial date of March 1, 2023. Jesse Cannon, Brian Cortez Lightfoot Jr., Jeremy Jonathan White, and Luis Francisco Mora have the same trial date of April 3, 2023.

Original article here:

Categories
Corruption COVID Drugs Reprints from others. The Courts

Fauci Can’t Recall Key Details During Deposition: Louisiana AG

Dr. Anthony Fauci said he could not recall key details about his actions during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to one of the officials who questioned him on Nov. 23.

Fauci, the directorĀ National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984 and President Joe Bidenā€™s chief medical adviser, was deposed by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry and Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, both Republicans.

ā€œIt was amazing, literally, that we spent seven hours with Dr. Fauciā€”this is a man who single-handedly wrecked the U.S. economy based upon ā€˜the science, follow the science.ā€™ā€”and over the course of seven hours, we discovered that he canā€™t recall practically anything dealing with his COVID response,ā€ Landry told The Epoch Times after leaving the deposition. ā€œHe just said, ā€˜I canā€™t recall, I havenā€™t seen that. And I think we need to put these documents into context,’ā€ Landry added.

ā€œIt was extremely troubling to realize that this is a man who advises presidents of the United States and yet couldnā€™t recall information he put out, information he discussed, press conferences he held dealing with the COVID-19 response,ā€ Landry added later.

Fauci and NIAID did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Landry declined to provide specific details about the deposition until it is made public, which will happen at a future date. But he said officials would be able to take some of what they learned to advance their case.

Landry and Schmitt sued the U.S. government in May, alleging it violated peopleā€™s First Amendment rights by pressuring big tech companies to censor speech. Documents produced by the government in response bolstered the claims.Ā U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty, the Trump appointee overseeing the case, recently ordered Fauci and seven other officials to testify under oath about their knowledge of the censorship.

Doughty concluded that plaintiffs showed Fauci ā€œhas personal knowledge about the issue concerning censorship across social media as it related to COVID-19 and ancillary issues of COVID-19.ā€

While Fauci qualified as a high-ranking official, the burden of him being deposed was outweighed by the courtā€™s need for information before ruling on a motion for a preliminary injunction, Doughty said.

Wednesday was the first time Fauci testified under oath about his interactions with big tech firms, including Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.

Before the deposition, Landry said in a statement,Ā ā€œWe all deserve to know how involved Dr. Fauci was in the censorship of the American people during the COVID pandemic; tomorrow, I hope to find out.ā€

ā€œWeā€™re going to follow the evidence everywhere it goes to get down to exactly what has happened, to get down to the fact that our government used private entities to suppress the speech of Americans,ā€ Landry told The Epoch Times.

Other Depositions

The government moved to block some of the depositions, but not Fauciā€™s. It just won an order blocking the depositions of Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Director Jen Easterly, and Rob Flaherty, a deputy assistant to Biden.

Similar efforts to block the depositions of former White House press secretary Jen Psaki and FBI official Elvis Chan have been unsuccessful.

Chan is scheduled to answer questions next week. Psaki is scheduled to be deposed on Dec. 8.

Chan was involved in communicating with Facebook, LinkedIn, and other big tech firms about content moderation, according to evidence developed in the case and public statements heā€™s made. Psaki publicly said while still in the White House that platforms should step up against alleged mis- and disinformation.

Plaintiffs have already deposed several officials including Daniel Kimmage, an official at the State Departmentā€™s Global Engagement Center.

That center worked with Easterlyā€™s agency to create a coalition of nonprofits called the Election Integrity Partnership, which pushed social media companies to censor speech.

Kimmage was also responsible for meetings during which censorship was discussed, with State Department official Samaruddin Stewart acting on his orders, according to documents produced by LinkedIn.

Motion to Dismiss

Earlier Wednesday, the government asked Doughty to throw out the case, asserting that plaintiffs have not shown the government engaged in coercion against the companies.

Even if government officials ā€œurgedĀ social media companies do more to contain misinformation, any content moderation decisions made by social media companies ultimately ā€˜rested withā€™ those companies,ā€ U.S. lawyers said.

ā€œEven emphatic requests or strongly worded urging,Ā see ā€¦Ā (President Biden saying failing to take action against misinformation results in ā€˜killing peopleā€™),Ā do not plausibly amount to coercion,ā€ the lawyers added.

Plaintiffs are crafting a response to the motion.

Both sides are also preparing briefs regarding the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuitā€™s decision that blocked the Murthy, Easterly, and Flaherty depositions.

The appeals court said Doughty had not adequately considered whether alternative means of obtaining the information sought exist, such as deposing lower-level officials or seeking written answers from higher-level officials.

Doughty ordered plaintiffs to file a brief by Nov. 29. The government has until Dec. 2 to respond. Plaintiffs may reply to that response by Dec. 5.


Funny how he can’t recall things that are already documented as happening.

Categories
Elections The Courts

Winning. PA Supreme Court rules that if Ballot is not dated or dated wrong, must be put aside.

PA Supreme Court rules that if Ballot is not dated or dated wrong, must be put aside. The court ruled Tuesday afternoon that they were in agreement with the US Supreme Court. All ballots must have the correct date.

The acting Secretary of State was going to ignore theĀ  court ruling. Now that will not happen. At least not legally. I can see this comming up in blue states where white progressives claim they need to direct their house brothers and sisters.