No Virginia, Abortion, MSM, and Elitists aren’t a winning combination. Harris thought that going out and getting support from the MSM, Hollywood, Entertainers, Elitists, and women who supported killing babies was a winning combination.
The American people wanted answers on fixing Inflation and securing the border. They didn’t care to learn about how you kill babies or mutilate children.
One law, one page. No state law will be stricter than Federal Law. Part 18.
Where there is a State law that’s similar to Federal law, the state law cannot be stricter than the federal law. Example. If the Federal EPA says gas milage for all cars is 25mpg., no state can have a higher mpg.
There are no exceptions. States like California need to be reigned in. This extends the Supremacy Clause.
The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the “supreme Law of the Land”, and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.[1] It provides that state courts are bound by, and state constitutions subordinate to, the supreme law.
Get over it Virginia, California is seeing the light.
So we saw that ten counties that voted for Biden in 2020 would have nothing to do with toxic spill Harris. Trump turned those ten to the pretties shade of red.
Those counties include Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Inyo, Fresno, Merced, Butte, Nevada, San Joaquin, and Stanislaus counties.
Sorry Virginia, but this is funny. They’re going crazy in the land of the zombies. Harris deniers are demanding a recount or some kind of audit. They have been all over twitter. And the tweets are getting millions of views. I’m sorry, but that’s hilarious.
To my lurkers on the left. The election of 2024 was “the most secure in American history.”
Why Harris lost. Culture.
There were numerous reasons why Trump was elected President. But one that sticks out are the Culture wars that Harris embraced. Ann Coulter says it best. Here is how you wage a culture war:
You ban teachers from telling parents that their child has “changed” his gender. You require everyone around that child to adhere to the child’s new counterfactual “pronouns.” You pass regulations making opposition to male athletes competing against female athletes in female sports a civil rights offense. You assign graphic novels depicting sex, in this case, gay sex, to school children. You make celebrations of sexual identity, in this case, “queer” and every other type of “non-heteronormative” sexual identity, a routine part of the school curriculum and calendar. You make race and sex, that is, non-white race and non-male sex, a qualification for scientific hiring and research grants. Opposing those radical changes is not waging a war; it is belatedly trying to play defense.)”
Before the election, the New York Times newsroom had brought in popcorn and cotton candy machines, fake sparklers, and goodie bags in anticipation of the coronation of “Madame President.” On November 6, the popcorn machine stood unceremoniously in a corner behind yellow police tape and an orange rubber traffic cone.
DOJ to monitor 86 voting jurisdictions Tuesday.
I got all excited, thinking maybe I COULD SEND THEM A LIST OF WHAT LOCATIONS IN THE 11 BLUE STATES.
But then I saw that they’re focusing on 27 states. My heart sank. So they’re going to look at states that don’t have issues or juristictions where Democrats and HARRIS NEED HELP.
Texas will have the most counties being monitored with eight. That includes Democratic-leaning Harris County, one of the nation’s largest that has been the target of Republican state officials during elections.
In battleground states, the Justice Department said federal monitors will be on hand in Maricopa County, Ariz.; Fulton County, Ga.; Clark County, Nev.; Mecklenburg County, N.C.; and Philadelphia County, Pa.
In Michigan, the cities of Detroit and Ann Arbor will be monitored along with the city of Milwaukee in Wisconsin.
No Virginia, Trump didn’t say he would put Cheney before a firing squad. I’m sure you know by now, MSM, plus Harris, Walz, and Liz Cheney put out the lie that Trump was going to put Cheney before a firing squad.
Trump made the statement that Cheney had no problem with putting our troops in harm’s way, but it would be different if she was out there in the front lines. Below is the actual comment.
“Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, OK. Let’s see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face,” Trump said. “You know, they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘oh, gee, we’ll, let’s send — let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.’”
Some have taken back their comments, but some like the affirmative action TV comedian Lester Holt have not. Let’s see if Harris apologizes for her personal attack. Probably not.
Let the crybabies leave. WaPo opinion editor tells angry staff they could resign over Bezos’ endorsement decision.
I’m sure you’ve heard by now that the WP owner said that there would be no endorsement for President. Folks there started resigning and almost 300,000 fanatics cancelled their subscriptions. Great.
Bezos told us that people no longer trust the Post and other MSM. He was tryingto get that point across to the staff. They didn’t care. So his only choice was to tell them that they can leave if they disagree. Plain English. Don’t let the dor hit you in the ass.
Why White Trump Supporters lie about who they will vote for, and poor Black and Latino Supporters don’t. Let’s be honest, whites know that the Progressives will dox and threaten to physically harm whites if they come out and say who they support other than Harris.
Poor Blacks and Latinos know that those same lily whites are fearful of coming to the ghettos. Also, the white’s stereo type all minorities as gang bangers and rapists.
MSNBC’S Wagner asked the group about Trump’s comments about migrants coming to take “Black jobs.”
“Well, first of all, they are,” Armstrong said. “They are illegal aliens. They are taking jobs that belong to the citizens of this country. It is just the fact that Trump is saying it out loud. That is why the fact that we rally around, behind Trump, because at the end of the day, this is the stuff we have been shouting out as a community.”
Leftists in panic: SCOTUS Lets Virginia Resume “Purge” of Voter Rolls of Non-citizens Before Election.
WASHINGTON − The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed Virginia to reinstate a purge of suspected noncitizens from voter rolls.
Over the objections of the three liberal justices, the court accepted an emergency request from state officials to intervene after lower courts stopped a state program that had removed more than 1,600 names since Aug. 7.
The majority did not give a reason for their decision, which is common in emergency orders.
Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, a Republican, called the order a “victory for commonsense and election fairness.”
Danielle Lang, senior director for voting rights at the Campaign Legal Center, which represented advocacy groups in the lawsuit, called it “outrageous” to allow “a last-minute purge that includes many known eligible citizens.”
Sign-up for Your Vote: Text with the USA TODAY elections team.
“But the voters will decide this election, not the courts,” Lang said. “Eligible Virginia voters should know that regardless of this purge they can register to vote on Election Day & cast their ballots.”
Voting rights groups fought the state policy because it removed naturalized citizens from the rolls if they had previously declared themselves noncitizens on motor vehicle forms. Youngkin’s program had notified suspected noncitizens they would be removed if they didn’t affirm their citizenship within 14 days.
But because years might have passed since the motor vehicle declarations, advocacy groups and the Justice Department challenged the program in court, arguing naturalized citizens were being removed from the voter rolls.
The advocacy groups quoted Prince William County Registrar Eric Olsen, who said at an election board meeting Sept. 30 that his office reviewed 162 people listed as noncitizens in the state’s computer system and found 43 had voted previously. But his office checked and found all 43 had verified their citizenship − some as many as five times − but were still dropped from voter rolls.
A Trump supporter who was purged from the rolls told Cardinal News he suspects he forgot to mark his citizenship status on the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles form when he renewed his driver’s license.
Another voter, who showed NPR her passport, said she doesn’t know why the DMV incorrectly recorded her as a noncitizen.
In addition to blocking further purges, U.S. District Judge Patricia Giles ordered the state to restore the registrations of those canceled since Aug. 7 because federal law prohibits voter purges within 90 days of an election when voters may not have enough time to fix errors. A federal appeals court upheld that decision.
But Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares told the Supreme Court the federal “quiet period” provision doesn’t apply to removing noncitizens from the voter rolls because they never should have been on the rolls.
Even if a citizen is mistakenly purged from the rolls, Miyares said, that person can re-register to vote and cast a provisional ballot.
The Justice Department argued that Virginia could still investigate specific individuals – including any of the 1,600 – it suspects are noncitizens but can’t use a broad-based removal method this close to an election.
“Everyone agrees that States can and should remove ineligible voters, including noncitizens, from their voter rolls,” Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar told the Supreme Court. “The only question in this case is when and how they may do so.”
Studies have found a negligible number of suspected noncitizens vote, presumably because of the threat of criminal charges and deportation if caught. Studies by the Brennan Center for Justice and the libertarian Cato Institute have found noncitizen voting is essentially nonexistent.
But Republicans have made removal of suspected noncitizens a focus of their voter integrity lawsuits this year.
So, leftist studies show non-citizens aren’t on the voter rolls? Really? Despite proof that they are? How — uhm — LEFTIST of them.
