The AP’s initial headline and social media post, which summarized his comments as, “JD Vance says school shootings are a ‘fact of life,’” was criticized for being misleading. AP later revised the headline to clarify Vance’s statement, stating he “laments” the shootings and called for better security.
AP fixed the headline and the article, but over 2.5 million folks saw the lie. Harris and her security blanket loon still ran with the lie as did MSNBC and an obscure website. The website did no damage because it only has about 25-30 viewers.
For those who follow the economy, the latest job report is not a pretty picture. I’m sure you saw last week where we were told that from last March to this March, the jobs report was off by eight hundred thousand jobs. Yes, eight hundred thousand less jobs than what was reported.
Yesterday’s report for August continued that bad news. Not only did the government miss August’s numbers by about 20,000, but the numbers for June and July were off by about one hundred thousand.
Finally, over four hundred thousand full time jobs were replaced last month with over five hundred thousand part time jobs.
You can’t make stuff like this up. Nicholas Biase, Chief of Public Affairs for the U.S. Department of Justice in the Southern District of New York (SDNY), admitting that the slew of criminal charges against Trump is part of a larger political maneuver designed to derail his presidential candidacy and to make him a ‘convicted felon.’
BREAKING: DOJ Chief of Public Affairs Admits Trump Indictments Are a Politically Motivated "Perversion of Justice"; Reveals Lawfare Involved in Making Former President a "Convicted Felon" Backfired on Democrats; Claims His Former Colleague Alvin Bragg's Case is "Nonsense" And… pic.twitter.com/IQhR0ax2pw
In the undercover footage, Biase describes the prosecution as a “perversion of justice,” attributing it to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s ambition to undermine Trump’s candidacy for the upcoming 2024 presidential election.
So who’s working those Jobs Harris and Biden talk about? Look no further than the CBO and the The Wall Street Journal.
Since the end of 2020, more than nine million people have migrated to the U.S., according to estimates and projections from the Congressional Budget Office.
Fewer than 30% of immigrants, 2.6 million are “lawful permanent residents,” green-card residents and those who came through legal channels.The other 6.5 million immigrant are “other foreign nationals,” mostly people crossing the southern border without authorization, according to the report.
Amazon insists that its Alexa voice-enabled assistant does not have any political opinions — and that Alexa’s responses explaining why someone should vote for VP Kamala Harris while refusing to answer the same question about Donald Trump was a mistake.
“If this is real, this is wild. Amazon’s Alexa is a politically biased hack,” conservative commentator Charlie Kirk wrote in response to a video of someone testing out their Alexa.
Critics took aim at Vice President Kamala Harris over her new "accent" at Monday's rally in Detroit, Michigan. (Emily Elconin/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Views: 20
Harris doing her best talking like a fool. Be it greens or her trying to talk black ghetto talk, she just doesn’t get it.
Kamala Harris just brought back the “Detroit speak”
All the above-mentioned Countries have banned X. So why add Harris-Biden to that list? Well so far the US hasn’t, but there are reports that the US has worked with Brazil covertly to ban X.
President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, along with Democrats haven’t formally denounced Brazil’s censorship of X because they “not only support the censorship but have also been directly funding it,” investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger claimed Sunday.
“The Biden administration and Democrats have played an influential role in instigating censorship in Brazil,” Shellenberger wrote in a piece for Public, which he shared on his X account. “The FBI went to Brazil and gave its Supreme Court justices advice on how to censor its population. The US government has been funding many of the NGOs in Brazil that have demanded censorship since the election of a populist president there in 2018.”
Liberal reporter Michael Shellenberger wrote this for Public.
Edmond North High School senior Caleb Horst said school officials told him he could not fly the US flag from his truck. (istock)
Views: 23
What it means when a school district bans patriotism because of how it looks.
Recently we have been seeing where schools are banning or disciplining students because they’re proud to be an American. The latest case being in Oklahoma involving the American flag.
Be it a flag or apparel, the excuses are the same. It may offend someone or it may cause violent reactions. What that tells me is that the school has students who are a threat to Democracy and they’re the ones who the schools should be going after.
In a significant victory for states’ rights and the protection of individual liberties, a U.S. District Court in Texas has issued a nationwide stay on key provisions of the Biden administration’s controversial Final Rule on Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton won a nationwide stay that blocks the Biden Administration from forcing federally-funded healthcare providers to conduct “gender transition” surgeries. Previously, Texas won a stay of agency action that blocked the rule from enforcement in the plaintiff States, Texas and Montana. Applying the same logic, Texas then argued for nationwide relief, and the court has expanded the relief to the entire country.
In May 2024, the Biden Administration promulgated a new rule under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act that would defund healthcare providers across the country who refuse to perform or pay for experimental, unproven, and potentially dangerous “gender transition” procedures.
Under the rule, any medical institution that refused to perform the procedures could be stripped of all federal healthcare funds, including federal Medicaid and Medicare dollars. The rule further claimed to preempt any state laws forbidding such procedures.
In June 2024, Texas and Montana sued the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), arguing that the rule was a plainly unconstitutional attempt to override state law. The rule also relied on a misapplication of the Affordable Care Act which never authorized HHS or any government agency to compel institutions to perform or pay for these procedures.
“When Biden and Harris sidestep the Constitution to force their unlawful, extremist agenda on the American public, we are fighting back and stopping them,” said Attorney General Paxton.
“By blocking this destructive policy, which would have forced taxpayer-funded hospitals to conduct unproven and dangerous ‘gender transition’ procedures, Texas has delivered a major victory for Americans across the country.”
So, for those states that see no issues with the mutilation of children, this has to be heartbreaking for them.
Harris is five foot three. Bash five foot. Harris is slumped over. Very poor optics. And the substance of the interview? Bash did ask some tough questions, but did no follow up. I’ll let you decide.
Dana Bash: But generally speaking, how should voters look at some of the changes that you’ve made, that you’ve explained some of here in your policy? Is it because you have more experience now and you’ve learned more about the information? Is it because you were running for President in a Democratic primary, and should they feel comfortable and confident that what you’re saying now is going to be your policy moving forward?
Kamala Harris: Dana, I think the most important and most significant aspect of my policy perspective and decisions is my values have not changed. You mentioned the Green New Deal. I have always believed, and I have worked on it, that the climate crisis is real, that it is an urgent matter to which we should apply metrics that include holding ourselves to deadlines around time. We did that with the Inflation Reduction Act. We have set goals for the United States of America, and by extension, the globe, around when we should meet certain standards for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as an example. That value has not changed.
40
