Categories
Commentary Corruption Democrat Elections Leftist Virtue(!) Links from other news sources. Reprints from others. The Law

If this stands. 15 Democrats Arrested For Election Fraud.

If this stands. 15 Democrats Arrested For Election Fraud.

In rural South Texas, prosecutors have brought forward one of the most significant vote-harvesting cases in recent state history.

On May 1, 2025, a Frio County grand jury indicted six people, including multiple public officials, on felony election-fraud charges. The indictments, secured after a two-year investigation led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office, expose an organized ballot-harvesting operation that allegedly influenced multiple local races in a heavily Democrat region.

Among those charged were Frio County Judge Rochelle Camacho, who faces three counts of vote harvesting; former Frio County Elections Administrator Carlos Segura, charged with tampering with physical evidence; Pearsall City Council members Ramiro Trevino and Racheal Garza; Pearsall ISD Trustee Adriann Ramirez, who is Camacho’s sister; and Rosa Rodriguez, identified as an alleged ballot harvester.

State investigators say the scheme targeted elderly residents and those voting by mail, with ballots collected in violation of Texas election law. Under Texas’s 2021 election-integrity reforms, compensated ballot collection carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

The arrests did not occur in isolation. In August 2024, Paxton’s Criminal Investigations Division executed search warrants in Frio, Bexar, and Atascosa counties, seizing evidence connected to what the Attorney General’s office described as an “illegal ballot-harvesting ring.”

The warrants were the culmination of years of complaints from local residents who claimed political operatives were systematically collecting and manipulating mail-in ballots. Investigators believe the operation was linked to a political network that benefited multiple Democrat candidates in local races.

The investigation expanded in mid-2025. On June 30, 2025, a second grand jury returned indictments against nine additional individuals, bringing the total number of defendants to fifteen. Among the newly charged was former Texas House candidate Cecilia Castellano, a Democrat, as well as former Bexar County Democrat Party Chair Juan Manuel Medina.

Other defendants include current and former city officials, school board members, and county commissioners across Frio County. The charges range from vote harvesting to tampering with government records, all tied to the same alleged coordinated ballot-collection network.

Court filings reviewed in the case describe how vote harvesters allegedly approached voters, particularly the elderly, under the pretext of offering assistance, then took possession of ballots before they were mailed.

In some instances, investigators say, those involved exchanged cash or electronic payments via apps like Cash App to secure ballots or voter information. Under Texas law, offering or accepting compensation for ballot collection is a third-degree felony.

Despite the scale of the operation and the number of public officials implicated, national Democrats and prominent state-level Democrats have been almost entirely silent.

For years, Democrats have claimed that voter fraud in Texas is virtually nonexistent. Yet here, in a single rural county, a two-year probe has resulted in fifteen criminal indictments, including against a sitting county judge, multiple city council members, and school district officials.

Texas law treats chain-of-custody breaches, compensated ballot collection, and tampering with election records as serious offenses for a reason. Mail-in ballots are especially vulnerable to exploitation when voter identities, ballot custody, and submission procedures are not strictly protected.

The Frio County case demonstrates how easily those protections can be circumvented when officials themselves are involved in breaking the law.

Election integrity is not a partisan issue, but the refusal of Democrats to address this case underscores a broader double standard. When allegations involve Republicans, Democrats demand full investigations, resignations, and sweeping reforms. When the accused are Democrats—especially in regions critical to their electoral strategy—silence prevails.

This article originally appeared at The Gateway Pundit.

Share
Categories
Black Supremacy Commentary Democrat Links from other news sources. Opinion Poetic Justice Politics Progressive Racism The Courts The Law Trump White Progressive Supremacy

Sorry Virginia, what you call paybacks I call Justice being served.

Sorry Virginia, what you call paybacks I call Justice being served.

The fanatics on the left are crying about what’s happening in the courts and how the DOJ is being used. They claim paybacks. So if that’s the case, does that mean you acknowledge that you did wrong?

What did the left do? Let’s use James as an example. Targeted Prosecution, use a victimless crime, storming Mar-aLargo, Secret White House meetings with Biden lawyers, using a criminal trial for a civil court, Election interference, etc., etc.

Share
Categories
Commentary History Just my own thoughts New Kid on the block Opinion The Law

DEFINITIONS OF DEMOCRACY.

DEFINITIONS OF DEMOCRACY.

One way democracy can be defined is as the highest form of self determination. The latter concept could be defined as: 1) real control over one’s body 2) the right and the resources to satisfy one’s vital needs 3) the recognition of human interdependence & social rights & obligations.

Democracy can also be defined as a system of governing society in which laws, policies, and major political decisions are ostensibly determined by a numerical majority of the people in any given political jurisdiction.
However, we’ve seen where ‘the people’ can be defined as either an empowered numerical minority, legally classified as citizens, or a numerical majority socially-engineered by a ruling class.

In colonial America, e.g., and in the nation state which succeeded it, the slavocratic ruling class socially-engineered, over time, a numerical majority of the population classified-as-white, primarily through genocide and white supremacist immigration policies.

The U.S. is generally recognized as a ‘representative democracy’. Theoretically, laws are passed and policies and practices are implemented which, supposedly, express the will of the majority of people. In actuality they represent, more often than not, the will of the biggest benefactors, usually big corporations, wealthy families and individuals.

Major financial donors, not politicians, often write legislation in addition to threatening to cut off (and cutting off!) future campaign donations as retaliation for policies which go against their interests.

But the real antidemocratic elements of the U.S. electoral system are baked into the structure itself. . .

“. . .The hallowed 1787 parchment’s Electoral College system permits someone to ascend to the White House without winning a majority in the national popular presidential vote. Majority support is not required . . .The Electoral College significantly inflates the ‘democratic’ electoral voice of the nation’s most reactionary, white, racists, rural and ‘red’ (Republican) states.”
Paul Street

If we consider the malapportioned Senate, the undemocratically appointed Supreme Court, the gerrymandered U.S. House of Representatives, etc. and THE BIG MONEY in politics, the U.S. political system can not be accurately and honestly described as a democracy, in spite of honest and earnest efforts to make it one.

Share
Categories
Free Speech New Kid on the block Opinion Politics The Law

Lawlessness.

Lawlessness, it has become a big problem in this country. From the petty thing as driving too fast, to the shameless antisemitism that is sweeping the country, to the trafficking of youngsters and women, to drugs that can kill an entire city, to politicians who act on insider information to the detriment of honest citizens who have no conduit to such information, to the defiance of lawful orders from law enforcement officers, these are but a few instances of the lawlessness that infects our Republic.
In an earlier time in the western US, vigilante justice often served as the only viable law in a near lawless society. It may not have been pretty, but it was effective. Is that where we are headed?

Judges who feel they have the right to hand down sentences that do not reflect the will of the people and juries who defend actions the American public view as heinous. Is this not judicial lawlessness?

Lawless activities by elected officials defies the very idea of a lawful society. Solon, the ancient Greek philosopher wrote, “To make an empire durable, the magistrates must obey the laws and the people the magistrates”. (638 – 558 BC) Does this not speak to the problem at hand?

I have no magic wand that I can wave and make this go away, but I do think that for We the People to ignore such activity can only lead to more acts of lawlessness.

An old cowboy saying comes to mind, “Half assed measures yield half assed results”.

Not to put too sharp a point on it, but; lawless acts erode the freedom of all law-abiding citizens.
Former Federal Judge Learned Hand said in a 1944 speech, “liberty did not mean the freedom to do as one likes. That is the denial of liberty, and leads straight to its overthrow, A society in which men recognize no check upon their freedom soon becomes a society where freedom is the possession of only a savage few”.

I for one, have no desire to live in such a society.

Walt Mow 2025

Share
Categories
Links from other news sources. The Courts The Law

Another great win. Who cares what a traffic court judge says.

Another great win. Who cares what a traffic court judge says.

In a 6-3 decision, the US Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump Administration to resume deporting illegal aliens to ‘third-party’ countries. This means the Trump Administration’s effort to deport criminal aliens to South Sudan is back on.

The Supreme Court granted the Trump Administration’s emergency application and paused Judge Brian Murphy’s order blocking the third-country removals. Judge Murphy says he doesn’t care what the Supreme Court ruled. He wants the illegals back here so they can vote in the midterms.

On Monday evening, Judge Murphy ignored the US Supreme Court and said his previous order remains in effect.

“The Court’s May 21, 2025, Order on Remedy remains in full force and effect, notwithstanding today’s stay of the Preliminary Injunction,” Murphy said. Murphy said he only recognizes the dissent and not the majority opinion.

Share
Categories
January 6 Leftist Virtue(!) Links from other news sources. Opinion Politics The Law

Hey Virginia, guess who’s next to be fired? J6 faux prosecutors.

Hey Virginia, guess who’s next to be fired? J6 faux prosecutors.

There’s a group of J6 prosecutors who should have been fired. But the acting US attorney demoted this group giving them a second chance. So what do they do? Stab their boss in the back. Filed a phony complaint.

“John Crabb and Elizabeth Aloi, who prosecuted contempt of Congress cases that sent Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro to jail for four months apiece. They include Jason McCullough, who helped lead the team that sent top Proud Boys leaders Enrique Tarrio, Joe Biggs and Ethan Nordean to prison for their role in orchestrating the breach of the Capitol. And they include Kathryn Rakoczy, who was a lead prosecutor in the Jan. 6 cases of Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes and more than a dozen of his allies, for their involvement in the attack on the Capitol,” Politico reported.

Share
Categories
Links from other news sources. The Courts The Law Winning

A buffer against a Progressive Wisconsin Supreme Court. Voter ID added to state constitution.

A buffer against a Progressive Wisconsin Supreme Court. Voter ID added to state constitution.

In case the left won the special election, they did, A change to the Constitution was placed on the ballot.

Wisconsin voters have overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment to enshrine the state’s voter ID requirement.

The amendment passed with approximately 70% support, reflecting a broad consensus among Wisconsinites on the importance of safeguarding elections.

(3) Decision Desk HQ on X: “Decision Desk HQ projects Wisconsin Question 1 (adding voter ID requirement to the state’s constitution) has passed. . #DecisionMade: 9:18 PM EDT Results: https://t.co/l3fvgPUaqq https://t.co/8Y59GMzpgM” / X

Share
Categories
Commentary Links from other news sources. Opinion Politics The Law

Do you believe a real live lawyer or someone who did a law students homework for ten years?

Do you believe a real live lawyer or someone who did a law students homework for ten years.

There’s websites and lawyer wanna be’s who give baseless opinions on what they think the law is. Here’s Andrew McCarthy’s legal opinion on the Muslim terrorist who the government wants to deport.

McCarthy served as an assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. He led the terrorism prosecution against Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman and eleven others. The defendants were convicted of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and planning a series of attacks against New York City landmarks. He also contributed to the prosecutions of terrorists who bombed United States embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

If a person is credibly accused of crimes like extortion, there is no legal prohibition against using speech as evidence of those crimes. And if a person is credibly accused of conspiracy, there is no legal bar against presenting the conspirators’ association with each other as evidence that they were joint participants in a criminal agreement.

Keep that in mind. We’re already hearing twaddle about the First Amendment from apologists for Khalil, the Syria-born former Columbia University student. He claims Palestinian heritage and the Trump administration is seeking to deport him over his role in campus uprisings driven by his support for Hamas – which has been formally designated a terrorist organization under U.S. law for nearly 30 years.

In a nutshell, the defense goes like this. Khalil is a lawful permanent resident alien (LPR), a green-card holder. As a matter of law, that makes him a U.S. person whose rights approximate those of an American citizen. Ergo, he cannot lawfully be expelled from the United States for constitutionally protected conduct – his association with other pro-Hamas student agitators and his speech on their behalf as a “mediator” in interactions with Columbia’s administration.

Now, there are a number of legal flaws in this defense (I’ve outlined them in this National Review essay). While the rights of LPRs are similar to those of American citizens, they are not identical. LPRs are still aliens. Federal immigration law has long provided that aliens can be deported over criminal conduct, terrorist support, and national security concerns – something that cannot be done to U.S. citizens.

But I want to take issue with the basic premise that Khalil’s conduct was nothing more than constitutionally protected speech and association for which no American would face legal consequences.

Khalil is not subject to deportation because he is a Muslim or because he is deeply opposed to Israel’s existence as a Jewish state. His political speech and association with like-minded students (whether Muslims or non-Muslims) are not the point – even if he and his supporters would have you believe they’re the only point.

When he “mediated” on behalf of campus agitators – who had set up an illegal encampment blocking other students from tending to their studies and normal campus life, and who had illegally occupied and vandalized university buildings – he wasn’t engaged in political speech. He was pressuring the university to make concessions to the agitators’ pro-Hamas demands, with the understanding that if the administration did not capitulate, more and worse damage would be done on campus.

That’s not political speech. It’s extortion. American citizens who engaged in such behavior would not have a First Amendment defense. They’d likely face prosecution – and, in fact, dozens of the agitators were arrested in connection with these activities, and may still face other legal consequences.

Khalil does not present a profound constitutional controversy. His case is about the authority of the government, which is responsible for the security of its citizens, to deport aliens – even LPRs – who endanger us. That authority is etched in the Constitution, as well as the immigration and criminal laws of the United States.

The complete article can be found here.

Share
Categories
California. Columbian Justice. Corruption Democrat Government Overreach How sick is this? Leftist Virtue(!) Links from other news sources. Opinion The Law

What is justifiable force when your home is invaded by a burglar?

What is justifiable force when your home is invaded by a burglar? California has what’s called a Castle Doctrine.

  • Fear of Death or Great Bodily Harm: Lethal force only permitted when serious physical injury or fatality is reasonably feared.
  • Proportional Response Only: No more force than appears minimally necessary to end the threat in the moment.
  • Unlawful Invasions Only: Intruders must have illegally entered or be attempting entry to justify lethal reactions.
  • But a California state rep I guess is tired of losing Democrat voters so he has a new bill. Here are some of the changes to the law this person wishes to make.
  • Homicide is also justifiable when committed by any person in any all of the following cases:
    (1) When resisting any attempt to murder any person, or to commit a felony, person or to do some great bodily injury upon any person.
    (2) When committed in defense of habitation, property, or person, against one who manifestly intends or endeavors, by violence or surprise, to commit a felony, or against one who manifestly intends and endeavors, of a person, against one who manifestly intends or endeavors in a violent, riotous, or tumultuous manner, to enter the habitation of another for the purpose of offering violence to any person therein.
    (3) When committed in the lawful defense of such person, or of a spouse, parent, child, master, mistress, or servant of such person, when there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony or to do some great bodily injury, and imminent danger of such design being accomplished; but such person, or the person in whose behalf the defense was made, if he or she was the assailant or engaged in mutual combat, must really and in good faith have endeavored to decline any further struggle before the homicide was committed. to do some great bodily injury, and imminent danger of such design being accomplished.

    (4)When necessarily committed in attempting, by lawful ways and means, to apprehend any person for any felony committed, or in lawfully suppressing any riot, or in lawfully keeping and preserving the peace.

    California is currently a ‘stand your ground’ state, but that would change. The state rep shows his true colors.Kyle Rittenhouse syndrome.

  • https://x.com/AsmRickZbur/status/1894490284526113043?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1894490284526113043|twgr^ff0211895f5ac785cc8bb3120f2c952d04306640|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2025%2F03%2Fpeople-outraged-after-california-democrat-introduces-bill-criminalize%2F

Share
Categories
America's Heartland Commentary Corruption Crime Democrat Hate Leftist Virtue(!) Links from other news sources. Loser The Law

Shumer under investigation?

Shumer under investigation?

The Tampa Free Press is reporting that Interim D.C. U.S. Attorney Ed Martin has launched a preliminary investigation into Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) over threatening remarks he made toward Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch in 2020. Below from Microsoft AI.

Yes, the Department of Justice has launched an investigation into Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. The probe is led by interim D.C. U.S. Attorney Edward R. Martin, Jr., and it focuses on Schumer’s past comments directed at Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch.

Share