Where Millennials are and are not buying. More and more millennials are buying instead of renting. Just over 50 percent. I guess that tells you who has the money in most cases.
Judge allows Gaetz and Greene to go forward with their lawsuit against California cities. Three California venues that were slated to hold “Put America First” rallies in 2021 canceled their plans amid concerns over the divisiveness of the lawmakers. The event was originally planned to be held in Laguna Hills, then moved to Riverside and finally to Anaheim.
Well, known Progressive hate groups were added to the lawsuit. The NAACP and the League of Women Voters, along with others. This upset the judge who claimed those groups had first amendment rights.
FDA admits defeat. Boxes of the drug Ivermectin
Dimas Ardian/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Views: 20
Winning. FDA war on Ivermectin may be over. Back in 2022 a lawsuit was filed against the FDA for their derogatory comments on Ivermectin. Doctors were prescribing human doses but the FDA made it look as if the doses were the horse or cow doses. Even posted this on a phony website they created.
Well the FDA won the first round. But then this happened.
Fifth Circuit sides with ivermectin-prescribing doctors in their quarrel with the FDA
The Food and Drug Administration is not a physician, so it had no business cautioning people not to take ivermectin to ward off Covid-19 infections with social media posts stating, “You are not a horse,” the Fifth Circuit said.
So when it was sent back, the FDA gave in. Here’s what they agreed to.
The FDA agreed to delete the Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook posts from August 21, 2021 that read, “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.” (A screencap of the X/twitter one is above and still online here.)
It will also remove the Twitter post (below) from April 26, 2022 that reads, “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending.
Further, the FDA will delete all other social media posts on FDA accounts that link to its website called “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.”
It will “retire” this website (called a consumer update) originally posted on March 5, 2021 and revised on September 7, 2021. The FDA retains the right to post a revised update.
Four Medications the Government Tried to Restrict During COVID and How to Legally Get Them
The following content was sponsored by The Wellness Company on the original site, BREITBART.
Just a few years ago, it would have been unthinkable that our government would ever try to restrict access to certain drugs. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, opened our eyes to just how far our government would go to line the pockets of Big Pharma.
Here are four critical medications that might have been hard to get during the pandemic due to pressure from the government and big medicine:
1. IVERMECTIN
Nobel-prize winning medicine demonized as “horse medicine” by the mainstream media and the FDA, Ivermectin is on the World Health Organization’s list of essential medicines.
Depositphotos
2. HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE
An antiviral that has been used for 50 years for the treatment of various diseases, Hydroxychloroquine was smeared by the left and medical establishment after President Donald Trump advocated for it.
Depositphotos
3. GENERIC Z-PAK
One of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in history, Z-Pak is also a key component in early treatment protocols and thus came under fire by some in our crooked medical establishment.
Depositphotos
4. BUDESONIDE
Budesonide is an inhaled corticosteroid breathing treatment used to reduce inflammation in the airways and lungs.
Depositphotos
Access to all of these critical prescription medications were limited or restricted, making them difficult for suffering Americans to get.
2024 is the year to be prepared.
We know what the globalists did in 2020, and we know they will do whatever they can to maintain power, which makes 2024 a potentially very dangerous year for Americans.
Warning: The following is their advertisement if not interested, stop here.
Unlike 2020, you don’t have to be caught unprepared, and that’s where the Wellness Company comes in.
The Wellness Company and its great doctors – like Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Drew, Dr. Harvey Risch, and Dr. Jim Thorp – are regularly in the media fighting against the broken medical establishment.
Dr. Thorp, one of the nation’s leading critics of corrupt Big Pharma, believes that now – more than ever – people should be prepared for the next pandemic:
I’ve strongly recommended “stockpiling” critical medications including antibiotics since the turn of the century. This has been an incredible investment as many friends, family, and patients have benefited. Now, in the winter of 2024, this recommendation is even more crucial.
This kit is prescription-only – you can’t find it in any store or pharmacy. Simply fill out a short questionnaire after purchase and a trusted Wellness Company doctor will confirm your suitability and issue your prescription, Contagion Kit.
This is the perfect emergency kit at the perfect price. Every home should have this for peace of mind. – Rebecca B.
This is absolutely great! I encourage everyone to buy one of these for emergencies!! – Melody H.
Peace of mind. It is an amazing peace of mind to have this kit in case of emergencies and shortages. The Wellness Company did an excellent job of getting this to me in a timely manner and I and thankful to have it. – Phyllis T.
Don’t be caught unprepared for whatever 2024 sends your way!
So how long does the Biden Cartel think that they can run interference? And what happens if the courts agree that the tax attorneys need to testify? The DOJ has “thwarted” the House panel’s efforts to get testimony from the Tax Division officials, according to the lawsuit.
The House Judiciary Committee on Thursday filed a lawsuit against two attorneys from the Justice Department’s tax division over their refusal to comply with subpoenas issued by the Republican-led panel co-leading President Biden’s impeachment inquiry.
The complaint asks the US District Court in Washington, DC to issue a preliminary injunction compelling DOJ lawyers Mark Daly and Jack Morgan to sit for depositions before the panel investigating the 81-year-old president’s alleged involvement in his family’s business dealings.
Daly and Morgan have been involved in the DOJ’s five-year-long probe into Hunter Biden’s alleged criminal activity, which has thus far resulted in 12 charges against the 53-year-old first son related to tax and gun crimes.
“The Committee’s need for Daly’s and Morgan’s testimony is urgent,” the motion for the emergency order states. “Every day that they defy the Committee’s Subpoenas delays and hinders its investigation at a time when the Committee is seeking to conclude its fact gathering.”
The CIA blocked federal investigators from interviewing Hunter Biden’s “sugar brother” Kevin Morris during a five-year probe into the first son’s alleged tax crimes, according to a letter the agency’s director, William Burns.
AP
Views: 9
CIA blocked IRS and Justice Department from interviewing Kevin Morris during five-year tax probe. The NY Post is reporting that a whistle blower has come forward and gave damming information that House Oversight and Judiciary Committee chairmen say the whistleblower informed them the intelligence agency stopped IRS and Justice Department investigators from interviewing Morris in August 2021, a Hollywood lawyer and patron of the first son, according to a Thursday letter addressed to CIA Director William Burns.
Why would they do that? Under the pretense that it involved an ongoing investigation? The Biden Cartel are good at using that as an excuse. Usually the CIA is only involved with foreign issues.
The whistleblower informed Oversight chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) and Judiciary chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) that two DOJ officials were summoned to CIA headquarters in Langley, Va. — and told Morris “could not be a witness” for their investigation into Hunter Biden.
US District Judge James Wesley Hendrix ruled that the House violated the Constitution’s Quorum Clause when it did not have enough representatives physically present for a vote on the legislation and instead passed it by allowing lawmakers to vote by proxy, using a voting protocol that was put in place during the Covid-19 pandemic.
“The Court concludes that, by including members who were indisputably absent in the quorum count, the Act at issue passed in violation of the Constitution’s Quorum Clause,” wrote Hendrix.
Fleeing New York. Photo: Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images
Views: 10
California here we come. Not. New Yorkers fleeing the city. Recent poll. And no I don’t think they’re crazy enough to go to California. A city full of crime, undocumented, and high costs for housing, food, utilities, etc. Below are the results of a recent poll.
Fifty percent of New Yorkers say they plan to leave New York City over the next five years, according to a poll released Tuesday by the Citizens Budget Commission.
The poll, the first taken by the nonprofit since the COVID pandemic, also found:
Only 30% rate the quality of life in NYC as excellent or good, down from 50% in 2017 and 2008; 33% rate the quality of life as poor.
50% rate the neighborhood they live in as excellent or good.
Only 37% rate public safety in their neighborhood as excellent or good, down from 50% in 2017.
New Yorkers feel only marginally safer riding the subway during the day now as they felt on the subway at night in 2017.
Only 24% rate the quality of government services good or excellent, down from 44% in 2017.
Still, over 50% of New Yorkers rates particular services as excellent or good, including fire protection, household garbage pickup, 311, and bus services.
A firefighter works to protect homes surrounding residences engulfed in flames by the CZU Lightning Complex fire in Boulder Creek, Calif., on Friday, August 22, 2020. (Dylan Bouscher/Bay Area News Group)
The Illinois-based insurance giant, which accounts for a fifth of the California home insurance market and is the largest property and auto insurer in the U.S., cited rising costs, increasing catastrophe risk and outdated regulations in declaring it won’t renew California policies for 30,000 homes and 42,000 apartments.
“This decision was not made lightly and only after careful analysis of State Farm General’s financial health,” the company said in a March 20 statement. “State Farm General takes seriously our responsibility to maintain adequate claims-paying capacity for our customers and to comply with applicable financial solvency laws. It is necessary to take these actions now.”
“One of our roles as the insurance regulator is to hold insurance companies accountable for their words and deeds,” said Deputy Insurance Commissioner Michael Soller. “State Farm General’s decision today raises serious questions about its financial situation — questions the company must answer to regulators. … We need to be confident in State Farm’s strategy moving forward to live up to its obligations to its California customers.” But it was unclear whether the department would launch an investigation into State Farm’s move.
Harvey Rosenfield, the Consumer Watchdog founder who authored the state’s insurance regulation system approved by voters in 1988’s Proposition 103, said the company’s announcement comes just after the state Department of Insurance approved a 20% premium increase for the company. That approval was based on State Farm’s existing number of policy holders, and he said the state should take another look at the rate hike considering the new cancellations.
There’s a sad excuse for a person who supports the Arabs and their military wing Hamas. And yes those folks live in Gaza and the West Bank. Well a supporter of theirs is up for a judicial position.
Several Democrats (Mastro and Manchin) will not support the nomination since no Republicans will support this person. This person sat on the board of an organization (Center for Security, Race, and Rights at Rutgers) that “produced several extremist programs, featured speakers with ties to known terrorist organizations, and sponsored lectures brazenly touting antisemitic themes,” National Review said.
85
